So, we have a bipartisan majority to preserve the filibuster, 52-48
https://twitter.com/grace_panetta/st...05799408111626
McConnell on the floor, reminding everyone that the last president who wanted to kill the filibuster to get what he wanted: "We had a one word answer: no"
So the push, backed by Biden, to pass voting legislation without the filibuster fails. There apparently will be a vote tomorrow on the actual bill. Vulnerable Democrats will be made to register their vote on the matter, like Mark Kelly (D) - Arizona.
Also, Biden had a long presser today. He's well below all five of his predecessors in taking the podium, having only done six on his own a year into his presidency. But eh he's willling to do a longer one to make it up to the press. And what's he saying?
* The 2022 election will easily be illegitimate unless his party gets their legislation passed. Conditional legitimacy. Talk about sowing doubt about the legitimacy of democratic elections ahead of time. I hope Trump is taking notes on how the pros do it.
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1483928652307996677 Next time, demand they pass your legislation or the election results will not be legitimate. And let me clarify, I'm grateful he didn't also call for major protester/riot/pressure action at the Capitol in case the legislation fails and an illegitimate election result follows.
* A 'minor incursion' will prompt disunity within NATO, and very different than an actual invasion
CNN. Prompts Ukrainian officials to wonder why Biden's distinguishing between the two and possible responses. I see online that his administration has now cleaned up the interview response with released statements after the fact.
* "I don't believe the polls." Pretty Trumpian vibes there.
* A very messy response on his opposition-to-filibuster-reform-in-Senate=you're-with-George-Wallace-and-Bull-Connor.
https://twitter.com/tomselliott/stat...29828755660802
https://twitter.com/EliLake/status/1483928515103936516
I would like to congratulate Philip Wegmann on having been yelled at by two sequential presidents. ("That is an interesting reading in English. I assume you got into journalism because you like to write.") Sorry, if you're boosting your party's legislation and ask "At consequential moments in history, they present a choice. Do you want to be the side of Dr. King or George Wallace? Do you want to be on the side of John Lewis or Bull Connor? Do you want to be on the side of Abraham Lincoln or Jefferson Davis?" then reporters are going to come back at you and ask you to reconcile comparing legislative opponents to confederates and segregationists with calls for civility in politics. If you gotta attack reporters over it, you just look like Trump's second term press conference strategy.
Altogether, this is likely to erode a bit more of Biden's favorability. His major legislative agenda is done, but he may still get some victories on the margins if he breaks up the big BBB bill into just the portions that have bipartisan support.