Lol, I just realized that it would have the same initials as the GW2 expansion.
Yeah no I doubt that.
Are you implying that human being are inherently prone to bias themselves in favor of finding patterns and order? I thought Blizzard just released expansions according to very specific patterns! You're implying that it's nonsensical to try to find patterns in how this company operates based on extremely circumstantial evidence that could easily be chalked up to coincidence?
Nothing so obvious, of course. It was written across a whole bunch of different coasters that i had to arrange in precisely the right way so the topmost letter of each spelled out the message. Some people claimed i was just fudging things to say what i wanted them to, but i bet they're with THEM.
I also don't think "Empire of Dragons" really sounds like a very good name. Every other expansion name save "Legion" and "Cataclysm" unquestionably linked to something in the lore, and even the former of those two was very relevant in the context of WoW. I don't see a name like "Empire of Dragons" being used since it strikes me as so generic.
We normally have a bunch of fake logos too
The connection to the title can be by the same stretch as the naaru shapes
The sides are dragon horns on top
Dragon flame on the bottom
The bigger crack in the globe is a throw back to Cata while also referencing the splintered alliance and the scouring
Are we thinking of the same Shadowlands Logo leak? I'm referring to this one, which appears exactly as it does in HD today. (just in lower res wouldn't ya know it.)
and then for the Cinematic, it was 3D rendered, though once again this was not the graphic used on the promotional material.
If I wasn't clear enough, my mistake, however the hand-Painted aspect of the Shadowlands logo I tried to acknowledge as my basis for why I feel the Empire of Dragons logo is fake.
The quality of the Paint-Job doesn't match the SL logo, leaked or otherwise.
and then to circle around to my point about BfA's official logo, the leaked SL logo is far more polished than BfA's photoshopperoo. Why would the style and quality of the handpainted method decline in one expansions time so drastically?
When say, the 9.2 patch frame is pretty well polished. https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/wo...20211111183656
Even including new runes, First Ones Cyphers, in place of the classic Titan/Elvish/Demonic classic general runes we've had, and that EoD once again features.
Not certain they'd put that on the official expack logo, but it shows that they're interested in/have played with that concept going forward.
Last edited by Archmage Xaxxas; 2022-01-22 at 11:34 PM.
DRAGONMIRE BINGO2024 - 11.0 - The 10th Expansion - The 20th Anniversary of World of WarcraftFor Azeroth!
The above post should never be taken seriously in any shape or form. Failure to do so might result in laughing matters.
Not really. The "Lich King" is a pretty specific concept. It refers to something in particular unique to Warcraft. "Empire of Dragons" not only could be the name of anything, but sounds more like a sort of generic stock parody you'd see on TV. I couldn't imagine anything being called Empire of Dragons, really, simply because it's a rather nonsensical and boring name without any quality of uniqueness to it.
You never know when the quality of something specific in WoW will take a sudden nosedive for no good reason.
Legion for instance went the entire expansion without ever getting a "proper" loading screen featuring the Broken Isles map+some character, instead using the promotional image like what we usually see in the beta or in one-off areas like the Heart Chamber in BfA.
The world revamp dream will never die!
I suppose, but then again, Cataclysm is also wildly generic, and Legion is extremely vague if you don't already know WoW lore with the Burning Legion. Something referring to the Aspects would definitely be more specific to WoW, but I don't think Empire of Dragons is that bad as far as WoW expansion names go.
The world revamp dream will never die!