It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
The IRS doesn't swoop when it comes to Trump his tax fraud case has been going on since before he was president. I don't think a lot of people have a grasp of how untouchable people like Trump are, if he was a normal citizen he would have been in jail decades ago.
- - - Updated - - -
That would be up to the banks the penalty would be a fine because frankly they knew he was a bad investment when they gave him the money.
From what I remember, the issue is that he told investors/loaners one value, taxes another, and insurers possibly a third. They can't both be correct. The civil case is one thing, Trump will have to decide which amouint of money is lower and basically admit he lied to them. (Or, fight in court, probably lose, and then NYState gets to decide...or it's both) Criminal charges could easily follow, based purely on the fact that a company doesn't commit bank fraud without a person in the company committing bank fraud. NY is running parallel investigations that share info. It's a serious threat to what's left of his money and time on this earth.
- - - Updated - - -
Which is why I believe, in the loans, there's some very interesting language along the lines of "if you cheat us, we get everything". Trump had already gone bankrupt six times. Nobody was giving him the benefit of the doubt, they had a figurative gun to his figurative head.
He might. But NYState has no requirement to slow down. Neither does Georgia. And neither does Deutsche Bank, although as pointed out earlier they have a vested interest in owning Trump if Trump has any real power.
Of course, I'd like to see Trump get halfway into the 2022 elections then get bitchslapped with a subpoena, asset claim or handcuffs during a rally. Won't happen, but dare to dream.
Thing is that the IRS doesn't need permission to forcefully withdrawal funds from a person's bank accounts for back taxes if the person refuses to pay said taxes. They can also freeze accounts so that the person cannot access them or use the funds themselves until the IRS gets their money. The only thing the IRS needs is proof someone is purposefully trying to evade taxes. That is where these cases will come in handy.
Let that sink in. The IRS, if they have proof of tax evasion, can demand a bank to transfer money to them and a bank cannot refuse. So yes, they can easily go after Trump.
The pool of reputable lawyers that will deal with his shit is dwindling fast, if any are left.
He's gonna get someone with little experience from Bumblefuck who's trying to make a name for themselves. They'll make newbie mistakes from their first high stress/high pressure case. They won't just be out of their league, but in a whole different sport. Probably Calvinball, given Don's tenuous handle on things like "Facts" and "Reality".
No that's not the way it works because he still has the right to his day in court, if the IRS could do this they would not be disputing a tax fraud case with Trump for so long. The IRS is speedy because most normal people cannot afford the lawyers nor have the connection to put up a defense rich people do.
- - - Updated - - -
Thanks to his SPAC Trump does have money now so maybe he has no problems paying although he legally shouldn't be able to take money out that doesn't stop him to take out loans using his shares.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Are you talking about the lawyer he might literally have seen looking out his window?
https://time.com/6141548/congress-vo...supreme-court/
McCarthy and Republicans lose, the SCOTUS has told them that the Judiciary has zero authority to issue rulings on House rules that are not legislation, and consequently remote voting in the House can continue uninterrupted.
Since we're using this as a Republican venting thread, and because this skirts just close enough to forbidden topics that I don't want to nuke a whole new thread with it:
In addition to Florida's Anti-CRT Laws making it impossible for Speakers to talk about the Civil Rights Era, they've just now passed a fonderful new bill colloquially called The Don't Say Gay bill.
Originally Posted by The Hill