1. #12361
    Quote Originally Posted by Ivanstone View Post
    Or they don't care about the context because they don't care to appreciate more cartoony art.
    Which is entirely up to them. Not everyone likes "cartoony" art. Not everyone likes more "realistic" art.

    Art is subjective. That still doesn't excuse people from learning to appreciate different things. I used to a big fan of most of the OG Image guys but their limitations started to become more apparent when they didn't have an actual comic writer helping them a long.
    Yes, it does actually. You don't have to like everything. I'm sure there are plenty of things you never learned to appreciate.

    For example, there are Nickleback fans and Nickleback haters. Then there are people who heard 10s of a Nickleback song and then decided they suck. The latter group should probably listen to a few song suggestions from a fan or acknowledge they don't have the time and profess their ignorance.
    And there are people that just don't like Nickelback. They've heard more than enough Nickelback to last a lifetime. Maybe they even once liked Nickelback...or liked that one song they did that one time... but now they've been overexposed to it...and they just can't listen to that shit anymore.

    Its the same for comics. I understand not having the time or money to read all you like but there's nothing wrong with trying stuff outside your comfort zone.
    Nothing wrong with it at all. I've never said "No one should ever step outside their comfort zone". But there's also nothing wrong with looking at something and deciding "no, that's not for me". I'm sure you don't go watch every single movie that gets released...because you know what you like and what you don't like.

    Maybe if the person read Squirrel Girl he would learn to appreciate that style of art. Maybe not. Doesn't change the fact that his initial reaction upon seeing it was that he did not like it. And there's nothing wrong with that.
    Last edited by Evil Midnight Bomber; 2022-03-21 at 02:13 AM.
    “The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.

  2. #12362
    I Don't Work Here Endus's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    79,181
    Quote Originally Posted by Evil Midnight Bomber View Post
    Which is entirely up to them. Not everyone likes "cartoony" art. Not everyone likes more "realistic" art.

    Yes, it does actually. You don't have to like everything. I'm sure there are plenty of things you never learned to appreciate.
    And this is where we get into the difference between saying "this isn't to my taste" and "this is actually bad".

    The latter's not a purely subjective framing. It's stating a categorical, not a subjective preference.

    It's the same difference between "No guac for me, I don't like avocado" and "how can you eat that shit? There's avocado in there and that shit's terrible."

    Or, to re-use your Nickelback example, the difference between "I don't like this band" and "You shouldn't like this band, because they're bad".


  3. #12363
    Quote Originally Posted by Ivanstone View Post
    Unbeatable Squirrel Girl #4. Art by Erica Henderson.

    Explain why it’s bad.
    The level of skill exhibited is around a 4th grade level. It really isn't that hard to draw a proper nose for example. The proportions are also terrifyingly off. Legit Liefeld work might be better than this at least that has detail.

  4. #12364
    Quote Originally Posted by Endus View Post
    And this is where we get into the difference between saying "this isn't to my taste" and "this is actually bad".

    The latter's not a purely subjective framing. It's stating a categorical, not a subjective preference.

    It's the same difference between "No guac for me, I don't like avocado" and "how can you eat that shit? There's avocado in there and that shit's terrible."

    Or, to re-use your Nickelback example, the difference between "I don't like this band" and "You shouldn't like this band, because they're bad".


    Than the reverse applies as well. The difference between saying "This art is to my taste" and "this is actually good".

    Or, sticking with Nickelback "I like this band" and "You should like this band... because they're rad."

    Neither side is using subjective framing.

    And that's been my point. Both are entitled to their subjective opinion about the quality of the art.
    “The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.

  5. #12365
    Quote Originally Posted by Evil Midnight Bomber View Post
    Maybe if the person read Squirrel Girl he would learn to appreciate that style of art. Maybe not. Doesn't change the fact that his initial reaction upon seeing it was that he did not like it. And there's nothing wrong with that.
    And then we end up right where I expected to be in the first place:

    Quote Originally Posted by Xath View Post
    The level of skill exhibited is around a 4th grade level. It really isn't that hard to draw a proper nose for example. The proportions are also terrifyingly off. Legit Liefeld work might be better than this at least that has detail.
    Erica Henderson is a graduate of the Rhode Island School of Design.
    There's a face. It has two eyes, a mouth and a nose! Because its a face.
    So are Donald Duck's proportions. What's your point?
    Liefeld often tries to be detailed and sometimes fails. He's also very lazy because we've seen him do decent work at times. He has shown a very limited ability to do comedy although I think X-men #244 is still funny.

  6. #12366
    Quote Originally Posted by Ivanstone View Post
    And then we end up right where I expected to be in the first place:



    Erica Henderson is a graduate of the Rhode Island School of Design.
    There's a face. It has two eyes, a mouth and a nose! Because its a face.
    So are Donald Duck's proportions. What's your point?
    Liefeld often tries to be detailed and sometimes fails. He's also very lazy because we've seen him do decent work at times. He has shown a very limited ability to do comedy although I think X-men #244 is still funny.
    Donald Duck is much better drawn than that monstrosity. Just because someone is a design school graduate doesn't make all their work good.
    Last edited by Xath; 2022-03-21 at 03:04 PM.

  7. #12367
    The Unstoppable Force Lorgar Aurelian's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Land of moose and goose.
    Posts
    24,782
    Quote Originally Posted by Xath View Post
    The level of skill exhibited is around a 4th grade level. It really isn't that hard to draw a proper nose for example. The proportions are also terrifyingly off. Legit Liefeld work might be better than this at least that has detail.
    Galactus has a perfectly fine nose and squirrel girls proportions seem right on the money other then her fat head/face and feet being a bit small.

    But With Galactus‘s fine head and squirrel girls less then fine one it seems like it comes down to a questionable sense of style and not lack of ability.
    All I ever wanted was the truth. Remember those words as you read the ones that follow. I never set out to topple my father's kingdom of lies from a sense of misplaced pride. I never wanted to bleed the species to its marrow, reaving half the galaxy clean of human life in this bitter crusade. I never desired any of this, though I know the reasons for which it must be done. But all I ever wanted was the truth.

  8. #12368
    Quote Originally Posted by Xath View Post
    The level of skill exhibited is around a 4th grade level.
    I've seen 4th grader artwork that puts that garbage to shame.

  9. #12369
    Quote Originally Posted by Ivanstone View Post
    And then we end up right where I expected to be in the first place:
    Which doesn't actually change anything. We're still exactly where we started. You like the art. They don't. You're not going to change their mind just by repeating "No, it's really good" and they aren't going to change yours by repeating "Actually, it's really bad."

    You just don't agree on a piece of comic book art. There are worse things in life to disagree over.
    “The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.

  10. #12370
    Quote Originally Posted by Evil Midnight Bomber View Post
    Which doesn't actually change anything. We're still exactly where we started. You like the art. They don't. You're not going to change their mind just by repeating "No, it's really good" and they aren't going to change yours by repeating "Actually, it's really bad."

    You just don't agree on a piece of comic book art. There are worse things in life to disagree over.
    That’s not at all what happened.

    I questioned why it was bad. His answer was predictable: “She’s so bad, a child could do better.” Seriously, the only thing I didn’t predict was what grade he was going to go with. Some people like to use the 6th grade. Some prefer kindergarten. He went with 4th grade.

    It’s almost like I regularly have to deal with people who have weird arbitrary opinions on comic art.

  11. #12371
    Quote Originally Posted by Ivanstone View Post
    That’s not at all what happened.

    I questioned why it was bad. His answer was predictable: “She’s so bad, a child could do better.” Seriously, the only thing I didn’t predict was what grade he was going to go with. Some people like to use the 6th grade. Some prefer kindergarten. He went with 4th grade.

    It’s almost like I regularly have to deal with people who have weird arbitrary opinions on comic art.
    Again, it doesn't matter why he thinks it's bad.

    His opinion is not "weird" (there are many many people that feel the same way about that art). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
    “The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.

  12. #12372
    Quote Originally Posted by Xath View Post
    Please tell me this isn't official artwork it's terrifyingly bad.
    Yup...
    Quote Originally Posted by Al Gorefiend View Post
    Squirrel Girl inevitably coming to the MCU excites me, especially if she isn't a pure comic relief character despite being silly - Like Rocket was, and they made him great.
    Last I heard that was Milana Vayntrub's role. And that was as part of the "New Warriors."

  13. #12373
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadowferal View Post
    Yup... Last I heard that was Milana Vayntrub's role. And that was as part of the "New Warriors."
    I really need to go back and re-read New Mutants. Back in the day I felt Bill Sienkiewicz ruined the book. I wonder if I’ll have a better appreciation of it now.

  14. #12374
    Quote Originally Posted by SavoirFaire View Post
    I really need to go back and re-read New Mutants. Back in the day I felt Bill Sienkiewicz ruined the book. I wonder if I’ll have a better appreciation of it now.
    When I first read New Mutants Bob McLeod did the artwork. I was in love with the series.


    I share your opinion on Sienkiewicz.

  15. #12375
    Quote Originally Posted by Ivanstone View Post
    That’s not at all what happened.

    I questioned why it was bad. His answer was predictable: “She’s so bad, a child could do better.” Seriously, the only thing I didn’t predict was what grade he was going to go with. Some people like to use the 6th grade. Some prefer kindergarten. He went with 4th grade.

    It’s almost like I regularly have to deal with people who have weird arbitrary opinions on comic art.
    I didn't say she was bad I said this specific "art" was horrendous. I assume this isn't anywhere near the skill she actually has.

  16. #12376
    Quote Originally Posted by Evil Midnight Bomber View Post
    Only true if you don't count Disney+.

    - - - Updated - - -



    Art Appreciation is subjective.

    And while the art shown is contextually appropriate for a Squirrel Girl Comic... that particular style wouldn't work for a lot of other titles.
    There wasn't anything between far from home and WandaVision that I can remember, what are you referring to with disney+?

  17. #12377
    Quote Originally Posted by Al Gorefiend View Post
    There wasn't anything between far from home and WandaVision that I can remember, what are you referring to with disney+?

    I was referring tot his bit:

    We have had a disproportionately less amount of Marvel after 2019 than we usually do... Looks back to normal now.
    We had a dry spell in 2020 sure...but the Disney+ content more than makes up for that. Each D+ series is equivalent to about 2-3 films in regards to viewing time.
    “The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.

  18. #12378
    The Insane Syegfryed's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Darkshore, Killing Living and Dead elves
    Posts
    19,549


    Actor of the halo series said he talked to marvel about being wolverine, what you guys think?


    Also supposed credit scenes of Morbius leaked as well, they don't seem to be very exciting.

  19. #12379
    Quote Originally Posted by Syegfryed View Post


    Actor of the halo series said he talked to marvel about being wolverine, what you guys think?
    Sure, if they want another 6 foot plus actor playing a character that's supposed to be 5'3... Pablo can probably pull it off.
    “The biggest communication problem is we do not listen to understand. We listen to reply,” Stephen Covey.

  20. #12380
    Quote Originally Posted by Evil Midnight Bomber View Post
    Sure, if they want another 6 foot plus actor playing a character that's supposed to be 5'3... Pablo can probably pull it off.
    From Pornstache to Pornsideburns. I guess I can live with that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •