Yo, which rich celebrity are we supposed to be stanning for, and will that rich celebrity notice us for stanning for them?
yes, please do continue to deny the context and facts that do not suit the narrative that you prefer. go on.
- - - Updated - - -
honestly to me its not about specific celebrities, but rather establishing a legal precedent that WILL affect regular people down the road.
also to be clear. I don't think Depp is completely blameless. I do think that she brought out the absolute worst in him and then tried to shift the blame entirely on him while denying any responsibility on her part. judging by the testimony of their doctor.
Last edited by Witchblade77; 2022-04-27 at 08:04 PM.
not really. because there is a line between being violent with furniture and being violent with a person. she accused him of rape and physical assaults. and she has been showed to have lied repeatedly already. she painted herself as a victim, while in reality being a perpetrator. so yeah... there are grounds to it.
I dunno ...
People that didn't live through the 2016 election will be confused why the narrative is skewed in favor of; a rich guy with hundreds of millions, 40 years of name brand recognition, powerful dude who married a woman 20+ years younger, files multiple lawsuits to protect his image.
So you've never seen a court case?
- - - Updated - - -
Make entertainment. You say that like being entertained by something is a bag thing.
People have always been interested in court cases. This isn't the first or last case. Nothing wrong with being entertained by it. You mean 'make light of'? Havent seen anyone do that.
Resident Cosplay Progressive