I'd bet that druids are the last class to be universalized, if even. The extra work for race-specific druid forms is immense. It wouldn't surprise me if they decide on a cop-out, give us 1-3 extra races and just go "guys the other ones just don't make sense" for the rest because it's too expensive to create that many new assets.
Orc pala sounds wierd but tbh why not? I wish to see undead paladin or druid like rotten bear or smth :P Pandaren druid, Nightborne druid as well. I like the druid but tired of tauren and dont like trolls :P
Last edited by czarek; 2022-05-11 at 11:49 AM.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
So basically they just plan to make taurens, orc and dranei have more class options?
1. All alliance races can be Priests
2. All but HM and OG Orc can be Priests on Horde
1. All alliance races can be rogues except Draenei
2. All horde races can be rogue except HM and OG Tauren
1. All alliance AND horde races can be Mages except HM and OG Tauren
So really we're just making Tauren more accessible - approved
This is basically stupid, because Daelin was written as an exemplary family man.
Yes, only Demon Hunters have NEVER officially joined the Alliance or Horde.
Then why do you think that they will accept warlocks, which, unlike the DK, deliberately chose this path
Have you finally begun to understand what gameplay reasons are?
Just like Evokers? Death Knights? Pandaren?
Because fighting against a Burning Legion threat doesn't require you to divide.
He was? Because many cases of good husbands and fathers turn out to be cheaters.
Weird... then, all faction restrictions become meanignless.Yes, only Demon Hunters have NEVER officially joined the Alliance or Horde.
Why did anyone accept them? They are tolerated but not truly accepted into society as they are a valuable but dangerous asset.Then why do you think that they will accept warlocks, which, unlike the DK, deliberately chose this path
I know what gameplay reasons are. It doesn't make sense lore-wise.Have you finally begun to understand what gameplay reasons are?
During the war with the Legion, mainly class halls participated. And they didn't have to officially join the Alliance and the Horde. The Death Knights and Pandaren have officially joined the factions, and the Ewokers will do the same. I've told you this 5 times already, you really don't understand?
Condolences if you think so
It's called gameplay reasons
Yeah, and DK didn't choose to be that way and can't just stop being that way. Warlocks are much worse and the Draenei have a much worse history with Fel than with Death or even the Void.
Like so many other things
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
This, by the way, looks very stupid after the Legion, where we were the leaders of our factions. For example, for the Lord of Death or the leader of the paladins, it makes no sense to follow the orders of Sylvanas or Anduin in Bfa, because in fact he is equal to them in rank, since he is the leader of his faction, not to mention the fact that this faction is neutral and it makes no sense for the leader of this faction to kill DK or paladins from the Alliance or Horde simply because Anduin or Sylvanas ordered him to
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
My opinion is, if you as a player want any race to be any class, you forfeit any right to throw a tantrum over the lore they have to make up to explain why race A can be class B.
So if Blizzard really want any race to be any class they should just enable it, since there is no way they can win, if they allow it some players will throw a tantrum, if they dont allow it some other players will throw a tantrum, so they should just do what they want to do, and let those that want to have a tantrum, have it.
They could have fought as neutral NPCs if they're still part of the Illidari and not the factions.
Reality check, dude. Take one.Condolences if you think so
Again, they could have remained neutral NPCs. They didn't even need to add the Demon Hunter class if that was the case.It's called gameplay reasons
So do Nightborne? Orcs?Yeah, and DK didn't choose to be that way and can't just stop being that way. Warlocks are much worse and the Draenei have a much worse history with Fel than with Death or even the Void.
Then, by all means, let them leave us. But, that wouldn't happen, would it?Like so many other things
Like Pandaren until they turn level 10?
Different Death magic.
Drust aren't about rot and decay, they are about spooky ghost stuff and witchcraft.
Who are they? No Demon Hunter in the game other than your character is part of the Alliance or Horde
Yes, yes, as you say
How can players be allowed to play as DH without adding DH? And how could a DH player be a neutral NPC?
I highly doubt their history is worse, and I've already pointed out that draenei culture doesn't approve of that. They are too devoted to the Light.
What?
Pandarens are limited solely by their location until they choose faction, this will not work with demon hunters
If {all races => all classes} then {racials => removed}
Otherwise you're basically going to see Orc dominance in all aspects of PvP an no other class would ever be taken ever.
Vast majority of wow playerbase does not care nor engage in pvp. Why do you think they made War Mode and took away PvP only servers?
They're not making class availability decisions based on PvP. They're doing it because class + race restriction in this day and age is super outdated and confining instead of something "meaningful".
- - - Updated - - -
There's a certain sect of WoW players (probably most likely they're long time players who 'miss the good ol' days) that hate/dislike any changes done to modernize the game for today's world. I'm glad the WoW team is finally realizing it (or maybe it took such a hit of players leaving whichever) and not taking into stock really those tantrums.
It's just like when they opened up customizations for all the races, majority absolutely loved it, same thing for creating transmog, vast majority enjoys it (despite even the creator hating it because 'it makes armor looks meaningless'). Vast majority of playerbase obviously enjoy being able to customize their own character(s) in as many ways as possible. Who could've guessed this?
There's so much dumb stuff in WoW that was kept that way 'because of tradition' when it really didn't matter much at all the greater playerbase. It's nice to see them finally doing things for the majority of the playerbase rather than whoever these sects of static game state players are.