You apply to the arrow instead of the Hunter.
How does it apply to the Hunter?
Affliction Warlocks definitely use Necromancy, just check their spells out.
That's the thing about necromancy, it repairs Undead.
You want more healing spells? Check out the Blood specialization.
They need to be defined. Not just a broad Hunter, but a certain spec. Which, you cannot really pinpoint to me. A few, weapon-related abilities do not make a Dark Ranger. Nathanos, as i've said, is not your typical Dark Ranger. He doesn't even belong to the Darkfallen.
So, we can give up on the class and say the Dracthyr represents it already?
Why are you using your
current knowledge to dismiss Dark Ranger introduction when you couldn't have done it for the Dracthyr Evoker?
So are Darkfallen. You see how they come up with new material that you haven't thought about before.
The Evoker is just a modified Dragonsworn. So, what makes you think they wouldn't create an original way of introducing Dark Rangers?
Well, we could have said the same for the Evoker, which was expected to be a covenant-styled feature instead of a class.
Mages have an entire spec dedicated to fire magic. Do Hunters have one for dark magic? Do Paladins or Priests have one for lunar?
Why are you expecting it to be right now? We just got Evokers. Did you expect a Demon Hunter when all things pointed out to Warlocks filling their place?
Because i've started speculating way after the last class was added, in 2019. That doesn't leave much room for successes or mistakes.
I'm not trying anything of that sort. I'm trying to illustrate how blind we are years before the fact. And, actually, have plenty of material to work with. They're one of the most ability-rich concepts in my thread. Blizzard has increased their range of capabilities by a huge margin in the last few years with Sylvanas.
How much was that concept explored or developed? Did we have a notable character to represent it? A huge asortment of abilities? No, actually. It was mostly unheard of.
Gone?
She's in the Maw, getting redeemed.
It's funny seeing two guys who dismiss Dark Ranger arguing about what amount of shitting should be done to the concept.
You don't really expect them to be implemented as they are right now, do you?
Just Blood elf models with grey skin and red eyes. They'd need to differentiate it somehow. And add the San'layn in there as well.
I have to agree with you on that. The standards have been lowered.
People nowadays will be satisfied with multiple mount recolors rather than actual new content. That's why they added the in-game shop. For such people. That is deteriorating the game. If people are okay with lower quality content (paint job and calling it something brand new that substitutes actual gameplay, like a class) then this will only go downhill.
Not when it is supposed to replace a whole potential new class or spec.
Shadowlands customization options were beyond fine. They were necessary.
Night elf dark eyes substituting Night Warriors? Hell no.