So she was less of a whore before she went into politics...
“There you stand, the good man doing nothing. And while evil triumphs, and your rigid pacifism crumbles to blood stained dust, the only victory afforded to you is that you stuck true to your guns.”
Indeed, she did.
Originally Posted by Lauren Boebert
“There you stand, the good man doing nothing. And while evil triumphs, and your rigid pacifism crumbles to blood stained dust, the only victory afforded to you is that you stuck true to your guns.”
https://www.thedailybeast.com/libera...bortion-rumors
Reminder: Slow your rolls.
They had the receipts for their allegations against Cawthorn, but their receipts for this story are...very bad quality. I was fairly skeptical of this from the start - it's too perfect - and remain so.
There are already a ton of reasons Boebert is a garbage human being and the pinnacle of hypocrisy. Did they really need to potentially make shit up when they could just share the public criminal records of her and her husband?
Also, it’s yet more hypocritical projection on their part. For all their railing against the “Hollywood Elite” and claims of Dems using “actors” to fake national tragedies, it sure does seem like a substantial percentage of GQP elected officials are, in fact, failed actors and wannabes from online “talent agencies.”
Peace is a lie. There is only passion. Through passion I gain strength. Through strength I gain power.
Through power I gain victory. Through victory my chains are broken. The Force shall set me free.
–The Sith Code
Cawthorn's allegations all came with pretty comprehensive receipts, including video. This is relying on text messages, and includes the interviewer pretty clearly led at least one of them on.
Hilariously, the woman alleged to be Boebert from her profile isn't...but is a supposed voter-fraud witness for Rudy Guliani. Which makes me think that maybe he uses the site as well.
I'm plenty open to hearing more on this if they have some actual strong evidence to back the allegations. But honestly, we don't really need them to attack her character. She's already made that plenty easy with her public actions and comments alone.
1. Her constituent's aren't going to care about this development.
2. It might come off as a bad look if she is attacked for her choices as a sex worker or having an abortion.
I am well passed the they go low we go high or love these motherfuckers, but this kind of shit isn't going to be like the Cawthorn deal, who only lost by the slimmest of margins, and my guess is that happened mostly, MOSTLY! Because of a bunch of other things that the GOP finally distanced themselves from.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
Honestly being an ex-hooker who had two abortions would be more interesting than her current persona (one of those dime-a-dozen suburban white women whose two chief goals in life is being obnoxious to supermarket cashiers and getting kicked out of every bar in their hometown).
It...really doesn't. And she says she will be suing - https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lau...ms-paid-escort
We'll see if it's an actual threat or more along the lines of Rittenhouse, "I'm gonna sue everyone!" stuff that went nowhere.
We should probably wait for her to file before drawing any conclusions. Saying you're going to sue and then not doing so is a common tactic to try and get ahead of something.
Ultimately, either someone has the receipts or they don't. If they do and she's just denied it and threatened to sue, that'll blow up in her face big time.
Wouldn't sueing just open her up for stuff in discovery anyways, unless this is 100% bogus.
"It's 2013 and I still view the internet on a 560x192 resolution monitor!"