If there is a consequential election and someone makes the decision to either not participate or throw away their vote, they've made a choice. In the case of the 2016 election, people made a choice to not support Clinton by both actively campaigning for people
not to vote for her as well as not voting for her themselves. The consequence of this choice was that Trump was able to win the election, he was able to sit three justices on the SCOTUS, and these seats ended up shifting the balance of power towards the Republicans and has now led to the dismantling of abortion protections and questions about repealing other protections, such as homosexual marriage.
The SCOTUS does not operate in a vacuum, and we're going to see the Republican justices run as far as they can while they maintain power. The irony in this situation being that the people who labelled themselves as "Left", "Progressive", or any other name to convey they're farther left than Neo-Liberal are themselves partially responsible for the dismantling of abortion rights for women. This isn't to say that this absolves Republican voters of the part they've played, but constantly redirecting to them and saying
"they did it" is just a whataboutism (i.e.:
"I know we didn't vote, but what about the people who voted for Republicans").
I would even go so far as to say that people who protested Clinton by deciding to not vote or by throwing away their votes are arguably worse than the Republican voters. For them it's no longer a case of simple ignorance but an intentional and willful attempt to make a statement at the risk of American stability and social progress made over decades. It was the voter equivalent of throwing a temper tantrum, and now many of these individuals are complaining about the consequences of a situation they helped make (i.e.:
Play Stupid Games, Win Stupid Prizes).