I mean, it's definitely not that black and white. There are plenty of perfectly reasonable situations where employees need some guidance, direction, assistance navigating their role, and so on.
Hiring people doesn't mean that you think they're just perfect automatons that you'll never have to look at again or something.
If there was a "no shit, Sherlock!" award and all...
I wonder if they're aware that even in an office environment most people do about like... 4 hours of actual productive work.
The vast majority of the arguments in favor of traditional office work all boil down to either trying to justify micromanaging, or being unable to conceive of a lifestyle in which people are actually capable of having social lives separate from their work spaces.
Last edited by Elegiac; 2022-08-08 at 08:27 AM.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
As a manager my view on W@H is biased. The vast majority of employees I've seen can't self manage. Their productivity drops like a rock when they work from home.
I would like to point out that if I'm staring out my window for an hour, or playing Solitaire, that probably is "productive work". My brain needs time to work things through, and distracting part of it so the rest can get work done is necessary, for me, because of my ADHD.
Then I'll stop doing that and I'll punch out what any of my colleagues produced that afternoon in about an hour, because I don't have to work it out as I go; it's all laid out in my head and I'm just dumping the product I spent my distraction time producing from brainspace to meatspace.
Sometimes, the time that doesn't look productive is productive.
And then there's Jimmy from Sales, who chats everyone up all day long because he's an extroverted knob with no self-control. Jimmy's an unproductive shit.
Seriously, see the studies linked above. That's just not what's been observed. Productivity has, in 90%+ cases, stayed the same or increased. Maybe your industry/company is particularly unique, but then you should blame that particular situation, not work-from-home.
I manage a small team of accountants so this already-an-anecdote is even less useful, but once we allowed work at home schedules our productivity increased an average of 15-20%. All of us are pretty sociable so any distractions we might have at home pale in comparison to how much time was wasted in the office chatting. Our most productive worker actually works a hybrid schedule, at her request. She likes the freedom but doesn't like feeling confined to her home.
It definitely depends on the job though, as others have already said. Obviously some jobs can't be worked from home. People are people so it's also easy to abuse a work at home schedule.
{MMO-Champion General Rules} {Off-Topic Forum Rules} {Video Games Discussion Forum Rules}
"I would let Anduin ravish me." - aiko
My SO's boss (the owner of the small company) mentioned that he can't justify paying the rent on the small office in the small building it occupies if they continued work from home.
He's a staunch Trumper and claims COVID is a hoax even though it almost killed him.
He also pays his employees quiet well, and actual does share profits when the company has a good year with rather nice bonuses.
He also owns the small building the office is in.
Even then, I'm very much in the Graeber camp of "a good half of societal work is bullshit made up to consume people's time as a result of work being equated with worth" so I can't exactly fault Jimmy for being unproductive since he definitely falls into the 'goon' category of bullshit jobs:
It's fairly telling how most of the people who complain about WFH tend to fall into these categories, on top of business owners who have a financial and social stake in keeping people at the office.1. flunkies, who serve to make their superiors feel important, e.g., receptionists, administrative assistants, door attendants, store greeters, makers of websites whose sites neglect ease of use and speed for looks;
2. goons, who act to harm or deceive others on behalf of their employer, e.g., lobbyists, corporate lawyers, telemarketers, public relations specialists, community managers;
3. duct tapers, who temporarily fix problems that could be fixed permanently, e.g., programmers repairing bloated code, airline desk staff who calm passengers whose bags do not arrive;
4. box tickers, who create the appearance that something useful is being done when it is not, e.g., survey administrators, in-house magazine journalists, corporate compliance officers, quality service managers;
5. taskmasters, who create extra work for those who do not need it, e.g., middle management, leadership professionals.
Last edited by Elegiac; 2022-08-08 at 03:07 PM.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
I just want the departments under me to run well and efficiently tbh. But if you go from working 40 tickets a day in office in 15-20 a day WFH. I can't actually justify having you work from home it's just, the worst lol. I'm all for WFH I even prefer it myself but it has to make business sense :/
Reminder, Malcolm Gladwell is the Joe Rogan for New Yorker subscribers.
Malcolm Gladwell takes time off from shilling for reactionaries to slam working from home: 'What have you reduced your life to?'
Also, the guy that everyone in the office hates. Refuses to acknowledge waiters. Quotes Cicero in his email signature.
Last edited by Milchshake; 2022-08-08 at 04:59 PM.
Government Affiliated Snark