I did not need to use percentages to answer that question.
Because each zone in an expansion is at least a separate, different biome from the rest. Take Zandalar for example: Zuldazar is a tropical forest, Nazmir is a marsh, and Vol'dun is a desert. Or Draenor: Shadowmoon Valley is a valley in perpetual night, Gor'grond is a dense jungle with an arid region at the north, Talador is a forest, Nagrand is plains, and Frostfire is a frozen wasteland. But if the Emerald Dream is used as the location for an expansion? Zone 1: lush green forest. Zone 2: lush green forest. Zone 3: lush green forest. Zone 4: lush green forest. Zone 5: lush green forest. And so on and so forth.You're still stuck on biomes... jeez.
I did the exact same thing you did. What is your 'context'? "Emerald Dream is totally going to be an expansion theme!" So I used the same context, "Deepholm is totally going to be an expansion theme!" to illustrate how your connections are flimsy and nonsensical.No. That's just throwing stuff around that has no meaning. You need some kind of context.
Says the guy who claims "you need a specific shade of green" while at the same time using every single shade of green and blue in existence and claiming it's "emerald". The pictures you posted even betray you, because we can clearly see that the glow in the sea is way more blue than green. And yet it's a "reference to the Emerald Dream"?With you, i do. Because you can't distinguish between different kinds of green.
I already addressed that question. Please pay attention to not keep asking questions that were already answered. Rewording that question doesn't warrant a second answer if it's just going to be the same answer.We've explored a planet-sized zone?
That color is not "emerald" like you claimed it was:Your vision might be tricked by the fact that it is occuring in water. Therefore, you see shades of light blue.
Show me at least five varied and distinct biomes while still keeping true to the "verdant lush forests". Go.For example, the Shadowlands still follow that original description of land of the dead and shadowy realm of souls with Maldraxxus and the Maw. But, there are still more zones than just what we had expected beforehand.
It shows that I'm honest. Especially since I'm not the one claiming "blue = emerald green".The fact that you can't answer it shows a lot.
Which is still meaningless. Just because those statues exist there doesn't mean the stone watchers, who have moss on them because they remained inert for several millennia, are a reference to the Emerald Dream.Not just moss. Titanic watcher covered in moss. You haven't noticed these statues lying around, have you?
Which is irrelevant, unless you can show where in the current lore that part is retconned, which doesn't exist.Which is older lore.
Why shouldn't it?If it wasn't on the cosmic scale, it wouldn't have appeared on the cosmic chart. *facepalm*
Fine. This so-called "conceptual gold mine" has been basically stripped of almost all "conceptual gold" thanks to all the times we visited it, quested there, raided there, and saw it in the books.No. Conceptual goldmine.
Better?
It's not the same, though. We've been to Argus once, while we've been to the Emerald dream multiple times.Much like the Dream. You only saw a small part of it.
Cooooooooool... an image with no context or link to an article... yaaaaaaaaay.....
And we can find elementals in zones such as Badlands, but that doesn't make those zones "magical elemental zones".