"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
People can care about the lore, that's totally fine and reasonable. What isn't reasonable is to quit interacting with the subject of that lore "years ago" by your own admission, but still pay attention to it in order to criticize the people who create it. The original concept of "the customer is always right" is flawed enough without the 2020s version of it, which is "the people who aren't even our customers are always right". I'm not even trolling anyone, I genuinely think it's unhealthy to believe your opinion, as someone who doesn't pay for or even engage with the product in question, matters this much. It just so happens that a significant part of this thread is people calling the OP out for being completely incorrect, which is a function of the fact that the OP doesn't even play the game.
The sooner society realises that 'fandoms' are just parasocial relationships with art and shouldn't be celebrated, the better.
has he really said such crap about ignoring old lore because it would be constraining? his JOB is to tell new stories in the old lore that people loved, not ruin it. i know it's petty as heck but now i don't even wanna touch dragonflight as i'm certain the storytelling will just make me mad like shadowlands did...
The best philosophy in writing a long-runner, clearly. Everybody likes seeing something become the thing that it is in name only.
- - - Updated - - -
Thus far, Dragonflight's story doesn't seem to be disruptive at all. Even if it doesn't turn out good, there's no egregious, lore-ruining retcons.