IDK, Obama said himself on the Daily Show that the handling wasn't ideal.
IDK, Obama said himself on the Daily Show that the handling wasn't ideal.
what mountain of evidence? the only thing you have is a group that showed up after the fight was over to escort the survivers and gather up the dead. what else do you have
We had a drone that could have been used we had an AC130 gunship circling over head we had airforce fighters less then an hour flight away and none of that was used
This is a quote from a retired delta force member
"Having spent a good bit of time nursing a GLD (ground Laser Designator) in several garden spots around the world, something from the report jumped out at me.
One of the former SEALs was actively painting the target. That means that Specter WAS ON STATION! Probably an AC130U. A ground laser designator is not a briefing pointer laser. You do not "paint" a target until the weapons system/designator is synched; which means that the AC130 was on station.
Only two places could have called off the attack at that point; the WH situation command (based on POTUS direction) or AFRICOM commander based on information directly from the target area.
If that SEAL was actively "painting" a target; something was on station to engage! And the decision to stand down goes directly to POTUS!"
There had to be something that was readably available to engage other wise Tyrone Woods would not have risked his life to paint the target with the Lazar its just common since that you seam to lack to not understand that
Again, the team did not show up after the fighting was over. They were on the ground four hours in, the fighting was over when they extracted the people from the safe house.
And again, despite that testimony, no actual news source quotes any evidence of an AC-130 ever leaving any airbase.
The team from Tripoli was deployed 2 hours into the confrontation, the exact same time we received intel that suggested that the attack was more than a random act of violence.
3DS Friend Code: 0146-9205-4817. Could show as either Chris or Chrysia.
Why is koolaid linked to liberals? Does hating koolaid automatically make me not liberal?
Somebody earlier linked the explanation, but it's not linked specifically to liberals. "Drinking the Kool-Aid" references a cult that committed mass-suicide by drinking poisoned Kool-Aid because they believed the end-times were on us, and by taking their own lives they'd ascend.
The phrase has come to mean accepting things at face value as long as they are presented from sources you are biased towards.
3DS Friend Code: 0146-9205-4817. Could show as either Chris or Chrysia.
Anyone else getting tired of this? I keep seeing it happen. Poster makes ridiculous claim, is asked for any form of source whatsoever, vanishes, comes back next day to throw a ridiculous claim into the next conversation.
3DS Friend Code: 0146-9205-4817. Could show as either Chris or Chrysia.