Originally Posted by
Fascinate
No offense at all but no one has convinced me 2h is superior at all. No one has actually addressed the pro's and cons i listed for either, just people saying "burst is better" when in reality (at least with the 378 weps i have access to) this is false, dw has more burst (discounting a killing machine proc oblit on a caster under 35%). I dont glyph or spec for obliterate in a DW build, its all HB's and FS's, with necrotics for unholy runes while stacking mastery. Im not even in full pvp gear yet (have 3k resil and 1600 mastery so far) and my HB's are hitting harder than some people i see in full 390+ gear doing 2h frost. If i had a LFR or 397 wep i would be tempted to try 2h again but oblits usage is so low even in that build i think rolling with a razorice'd main hand will produce better results.
As for the guy above saying MotFW is why 2h is considered the preferable build i will say two things:
1. The majority that claim 2h is better is for burst.
2. Once i got the 4 piece pvp bonus i have not once hit an ability that costs RP and not had the RP for it, i have no RP issues as DW frost.