Shaolin Monk
MMA Fighter
Definately not the same, but a nice example of a smaller submission fighter submitting a considerably larger wrestler/striker here.
Grappling. Not fighting. Silva is the most accurate striker in UFC history.
---------- Post added 2012-02-29 at 04:43 PM ----------
The normal school of thought here is that YOU will get worn down, not your lighter opponent.
You have to expend more effort to do the same thing as the lighter guy.
---------- Post added 2012-02-29 at 04:49 PM ----------
I bet you were pretty unhappy on Saturday then. I was too.
Edgar was talking afterwards about how he thought he won the fight, but I didn't think he came close.
What do you think?
---------- Post added 2012-02-29 at 04:53 PM ----------
This is a long and nifty post. However you are saying the MMA fighter has never been in a "real" fight, which is probably not true. Plenty of guys get into MMA as a result of being in fights and wanting to win them.
Shaolin monks, on the other hand, NEVER get into real fights under ANY circumstances. Every fight a modern monk has been in has been exhibition or sparring.
Depends.
Given that MMA stands for Mixed Martial Arts, that implies that a fighter from that sport could also be trained in the same fighting style as a Shaolin Monk. It also depends on whether there is a Martial Art than is considered better or a counter to whatever it is a Shaolin Monk uses. Generally the MMA fighter has access to a far greater style of fighting, so I would have to go with the MMA fighter.
Assuming the Martial Art these Monks use is the best, then you probably have to take into account work ethic as well. I'm not sure who would be in better shape? I'd imagine both take their training seriously.
I think most people here are delusional. They've seen Shaolin monks in movies, and think it's real. Just because you've trained your whole life, doesn't mean you're ready to take on someone that's been in 20 real MMA fights.
I mean seriously, you're talking about breaking sticks, hitting bricks, breaking through walls. Yeah that's gonna help you in a real fight against someone who's trained specifically to fight man against man.
Average UFC fighter > average shaolin monk.
Last edited by Beace; 2012-02-29 at 05:14 PM.
It's mostly for show. MMA wins.the contemporary performing warrior monks are comparable to contemporary wushu artists who focus on beautiful, elaborately dazzling form rather than original martial application and fighting prowess.
Ya, ITT: Weaboos (are they still weaboos if it's Chinese instead of Japanese?) most Asian martial arts are centered on self discipline and training or based on the other guy using punches/kicks only. In reality monks don't possess some sort of magical powers that enable them to punch out another fighter in one blow, just because they practice forms while standing on a post doesn't mean they are engaging in more serious training than a guy beating the crap out of a bag or practicing submission holds, the mysticism surrounding these monks would evaporate quickly were he to get in a fight with someone trained in BJJ or Muy Thai at the same level as his Kung Fu, they are just more practical disciplines.
Most of the stuff is fake from the movies. However, there are some rare gifted individuals who can do absolutely amazing things. A friend of mine who trained in a specific discipline of Kung Fu swears to this day that one of his masters once demonstrated somewhere between a 10-15 foot horizontal jump from a dead stand still to deliver a kick into a heavy bag that almost took the bag off where it was hanging. This friend of mine is very down to earth and is not prone to exaggeration.
Just throwing in another two cents, obviously the above does not necessarily translate into a direct fight, but I think there are truly gifted individuals in every martial art/method of training. Personally, I remember a story about a CIA Operative from their S.A.D. (Special Activities Division), who was defending an embassy when it was overrun, and managed to kill 400 attackers by himself. First with his rifle and then gun, then when he ran out of bullets, he pulled out his knife and continued to fight to allow the delegates and other embassy staff time to flee.
Well, I dunno about your first statement. Not much to say about it really.
I do agree about your second statement, and I don't find it unbelievable that that CIA story is real. The thing is, gifted MMA fighters put everything they got into training to beat another fighter, 1 on 1. Let's assume the CIA story is real. That guy is obviously amazing at what he does. But put him 1 on 1 against Anderson Silva, and he'll find himself knocked out before he knows what hit him.
Anderson Silva may be the greatest fighter of our age (at least, that we've been given the opportunity to observe)... but in history? I know we only have conjecture to go off of, but looking at Chinese history, where at one time the masters did challenge each other to duels to the death quite regularly to prove whose martial art was superior.. things may be different. But of course, we can never know, it's all speculation. But just throwing in some more food for thought
---------- Post added 2012-02-29 at 05:53 PM ----------
Believe what you want. Also between 10 and 15 feet translates to 3.048 to 4.572 meters. Since it was a given range, and this story is from a friend, I tended to believe in the lower range of the category.
Yeah, that was Mike Spann. It wasn't an embassy, it was an Afghan prison and it wasn't being attacked, there was a riot. He never used a rifle and he killed 3 rioters, not 400.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnny_Micheal_Spann
So, I'm sure you'll forgive me if I take the whole 15 foot horizontal leap thing with an asteroid size grain of salt.
Unable to find this... as it was relayed to me from a friend (a different one), I'll cede this point to you and claim my story was fabricated/exaggerated.
I still hold true to my point that there are truly gifted individuals in every method of training and some are capable of mind blowing feats that would be considered nearly impossible.
Last edited by Shaderas; 2012-02-29 at 06:08 PM.
One point I do like to make. In modern MMA, asian fighters generally aren't doing very well. There's a couple of exceptions (Sakuraba comes to mind), but that's just the way it is. I've no idea why, but it's something to think about while on this subject.
And if you look at the history of modern MMA, it all started with the idea of pitching different fighting styles against each other, and see who came out on top. There has been Kung Fu fighers in UFC, but none of them were successful. The methods that have been proven to work in 1 on 1 fights, is wrestling, striking and BJJ. The Asian styles we love to see in movies, just don't seem to be able to compete.
Well personally, they need to take it to the next level and start fighting no holds barred... sign the death waiver and compete. Then we'll see which style is truly best..
As for the above posters, I am officially retracting my comments about that CIA operative, and am eating my words. If you would like me to commit suicide for my grievous error you can always PM me and we can talk about it
Well, they can definitely compete, but the nature of the competition demands that they be bolstered by grappling skills. Just look at how many UFC champs have backgrounds in Kyokushin and its derivatives or Muay Thai. They just need to be adapted to the environment they're in and they work just fine.
---------- Post added 2012-02-29 at 06:18 PM ----------
Well aren't we dramatic!