Page 3 of 16 FirstFirst
... LastLast
  1. #41
    The Unstoppable Force Adam Jensen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Sarif Industries, Detroit
    Quote Originally Posted by Kilz View Post
    What exactly is a soul then?
    And that kinda leads to a thread I posted about a month ago about the "reconstructing and reviving" of the dead and whether they'd be the same person or even truly considered "alive."

    If there is no soul, are we not just organic machines? And if so, does that really make us drastically different from intelligent forms made of metal and plastic? This then leads to the question of what "life" truly is.
    They ask me why I'm bringin' - A baby into battle - That's really irresponsible - And getting them rattled
    I say "give me a break - Get off of my back damn, it" - I didn't learn parenting - My daddy was a planet

  2. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by alms1407 View Post
    No because they are humans.
    And that changes things... how?

  3. #43
    Quote Originally Posted by Bergtau View Post
    For anybody worried about some sort of apocalypse, the machines tend to rise up because they were subjugated, not because they came into existence.
    I'm sure your sources are really scientific

    As for the question, I'm really not sure.

  4. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by Diurdi View Post
    I'm sure your sources are really scientific
    As scientific as the sources people are using to fuel their fear of machine-created apocalypse.

  5. #45
    Herald of the Titans Theodon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    I believe they should be given rights, but not the same rights we have (and that's not to say I think they deserve less, if such an AI existed) An AI will not have the same limitations or issues humans have, so placing human rights on an AI would simply not suit the form of life that's been created. It's a totally unique form of life and it needs its own unique set of rights.

    It will naturally have to share many of the rigts we have currently, but some would have to be created to suit an AIs life more specifically or else they're open to possible gray areas where things don't quite fit.
    Last edited by Theodon; 2012-05-04 at 09:49 PM.
    It's always been Wankershim!
    My Brand!

  6. #46
    Quote Originally Posted by Miss Unify View Post
    No. They're not human. Even if they can be programmed to simulate emotions/human tendencies that still does not make them human. And I have a feeling that the people who think they should would change their mind if the AI was presented in an ugly, metal slab of a "body".
    The OP Isn't talking about simulation, he is talking about true, self aware, emotion based AI. Basically, everything we are, just created instead of born.

  7. #47
    IF we ever develop an AI that exists in a mechanical body and is on par with humans in terms of sentience, we cannot treat them as lesser beings, if we don't want to ever give mechanical beings the same rights as we have, we will do well not to create life in any way but the usual way.

    Personally I would welcome the idea of an AI. And to the people heralding the robot apocalypse, watch those movies again, and look at the robot motives, it's people like you that subjugated them in the first place, even after being aware of creating an AI that caused said apocalypse.

    If humans ever create an AI, and treat it right, there's no reason for them to try to destroy organics.
    Last edited by Shiny212; 2012-05-04 at 09:52 PM.

  8. #48
    If they don't have rights, neither should we, since we are also sophisticated molecular machines that developed sentience. What really makes us different from machines when you get down to the scale of molecules?

  9. #49
    Quote Originally Posted by kazih View Post
    Whats so great about humans?
    Well humans would have built those machines in the first place. Also many humans have accomplished so many great things.

    However it's hard to say how great we are when we can't compare ourselves to anything.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bergtau View Post
    And that changes things... how?
    You are asking me why we should not be actively killing humans who are useless? In most countries killing another human being is illegal

    edit: Also any government killing it's own citizens or allowing it to happen would be condemned.

    These machines would have created by us to be used as tools for us, them being self aware would be a potential threat.

    ~Signature made by Resentful~

  10. #50
    If in the future we have to make sentient AI's there would be certain laws made regarding the situation. Might be you're just never allowed to make enough human-like things that they would need same set of rights as humans. There's just no *poof* heres a robot that thinks and feels like a human and we need to give it rights asap. It's a slow progress and society will see how it'll go about it.
    Quote Originally Posted by BlueRet

    "This server shutdown was so epic not even Illidan was prepared for it"

  11. #51
    Brewmaster slackjawsix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Tell me! where am i!
    if we truely have no soul and our brains are just computers than yes they get rights too
    i live by one motto! "lolwut?"

  12. #52
    Quote Originally Posted by slackjawsix View Post
    if we truely have no soul and our brains are just computers than yes they get rights too
    Why do people even bring up mention of "soul"?
    Quote Originally Posted by BlueRet

    "This server shutdown was so epic not even Illidan was prepared for it"

  13. #53
    I find it funny that people think so highly about our brain (it is a masterpiece yes, but not something you can't recreate or surpass). People like to call it 'being human' or having a 'soul'. You do know that self awareness, emotions, conciousness and all those things are results of electric impulses and signals in our brains yes? In the future, when computers will have more calculation powers etc it is possible to surpass the capabilities of an entire brain (given the knowledge of the entire brain structure and that kind of stuff). If they would place your brain into a robot, attach all the neural connections etc to the whole body then you will still be yourself but in a different body. Of course this is still sci fi, because we do not have the technology yet.

    Our brain is nothing more but an organic super computer. And once computers are capable enough, we can actually simulate our brains once we know all the connections that are present.

    Regarding the OP's question, I would only answer it with a yes once the AI reaches the same level as our own brain. Because then we are basically equally intelligent and self aware, and therefore deserve to be treated equally but once you have AI at such high level. Well, it would be the same as just shooting a human because the emotional impact and that kind of stuff are the same.
    Last edited by ThargixEchoes; 2012-05-04 at 09:59 PM. Heroic 25 man raiding | Thargix dk PoV.

  14. #54
    Quote Originally Posted by alms1407 View Post
    These machines would have created by us to be used as tools for us, them being self aware would be a potential threat.
    Anything could be a potential threat, depending on how you look at it.

  15. #55
    Scarab Lord Phookah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Zebes, SR-21
    Hell no, if it's sentient enough to ask for rights it needs to be killed with fire.

  16. #56
    It is impossible for AI's to be completely like humans no matter how technologically advanced we become. So no they do not deserve rights.

    How do I know AI will never be like humans? Go see Kurt Godels incompleteness theorem it proves human brains and AI are different at a fundamental level.

  17. #57
    Fully sentient? Equal rights.

    What counts as full sentient? Now... that's a much harder question.

  18. #58
    Mechagnome shadowlich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Hells gate and your next
    Yes all intelligent beings deserve equal rights.

  19. #59
    You probably start with programs that can learn things without a human coding it and it being able to create something new, like art or something.
    Quote Originally Posted by BlueRet

    "This server shutdown was so epic not even Illidan was prepared for it"

  20. #60
    Mechagnome lzsg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Stockholm, Sweden
    When an AI becomes fully self-aware, the only differences between it and a human are their anatomy and creation process, no? Take the androids in Blade Runner, for example. They were created by humans, and are as such completely artificial, including their minds, but they are fully sentient, with their own thoughts, emotions and desires. What reason could there possibly be for them not having the rights as humans, if everything else about them is?
    Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts