Why do people assume right away that anyone who speaks ill of diablo 3 is a biased "sob"?
I LOVE diablo 1, 2, wc 1, 2, 3, sc 1, 2, and played wow, i AM a blizzard fan in general.
But diablo 3? it doesnt look like a blizzard game aside from the fluffy graphism (which isnt even diablo graphism
) it feels like an indie 30buck steam game, not an AAA blizzard one, and i didnt even have the connection/installation/latency/queue/driver problems.
People have opinions, have tastes, deal with it instead of covering it all with "biased" or "whinny". Talk about the three monkeys uh?
And your last phrase suggests he should lie/alter his view because he "owes" blizzard his fame (so famous i never heard of him before :P), no, wrong, he owes his fame from the population, if it wasnt for sc2/cata would have been some other game that has a good player base, and not due to the game, but the player base.
He is very right on the piracy part however, and it is annoying as hell that legit players are the ones who pay for it, while piracy deals no money loss, most of the people who pirate wouldnt buy the game in the first place (likely because they cant)
Anyway... who cares :P back to enjoying the game