And apparently that sig was to NSFW.....
And apparently that sig was to NSFW.....
+31
did they put you infraction
You will not be forgotten, Eleanor / Steam ID / DeviantArt page / YouTube / Twitter
NO infraction for Joyflu that I can see, but I didn't think the sig was bad at all..
+29
I remember seeing a woman, and I remember seeing some clothes ... no nipples (not even poking through), couldn't even see her lower half .... someone needs to be less of a prude. Go tell em off in IRC Dars
+ 30
I can understand that being NSFW.
I didn't get a infraction, nice mod that way but still....NSFW? lawl
I've seen pictures 10 times worse in Marks and Spencer tyring to sell lingerie, or on perfume adverts, all of which are viewable by children ....
Go figure.
+33
The point wasn't about the explanation, it was about the generally perceived visibility of things such as nudity. If you're allowed to view a website such as this at work, in the UK I couldn't imagine many bosses having problem with seeing an image such as that.
That said .. the UK does have page 3 embedded into our national identity.
I was complaining that they didn't implement cynicism and complaining into the opening ceremony, combined with queue's (athlete parade), they form a part of the backbone of this country.
---------- Post added 2012-07-29 at 08:16 PM ----------
+35
T'would appear St. Helens are stomping Huddersfield
Last edited by Rixis; 2012-07-29 at 07:19 PM.