Originally Posted by
Sesshou
I certainly agree that our specs are far too similar, but there is way too much massive over generalization in the OP and catablitz's post. Could you get away with what the OP says, or the tbc rotation cata mentions? Sadly, that probably would do decently. However, that is a huge over generalization as much has changed. The biggest for combat I would say is the randomness to the combo points. In TBC you had a completely static rotation as you knew exactly how many times you needed to SS before each finisher which isn't the case anymore. You also have to watch RvS and tricks. Sub has to keep up a 2nd dot and manage cp procs. Assassination has to manage the envenom buff and blindside procs. We didn't have any of that in TBC (well granted combat was the only decent pve spec outside of possibly harp's short lived usefulness) and all of that is not going to get copied if you do what the OP suggests. So yeah, you could do either of those 2 things, but you also now have the option to do more, and thats still ignoring the long cd's.
A massive over generalization like that is a really crappy way to start your argument.