Poll: Is Garrosh a suitable Leader?

Page 11 of 18 FirstFirst ...
9
10
11
12
13
... LastLast
  1. #201
    Quote Originally Posted by Trassk View Post
    Oh you can like such a character I have no issue with that. Its just when people try to justify that kind of behavour as normal and one that should be an example to others is when it crosses the line.

    Hell, I like yogg Saron and the Lich king as villians, but you wouldn't get me saying shit like 'he's to misunderstood he just wants to take care of the undead', alright, I accept a bad guy for what he/she is, I don't try to sugar coat it.

    And thats exactly what Garrosh fans are doing now, they are attempting to sugarcoat his bad ways because they think its fun to act like that.
    All people have said is that garrosh is good for the game and that his goals are justified even though his methods are dubious thats it i honestly dont think anyone has said he was a great leader (maybe i did in my drunken trollin ways lol)

    we all know he is an idiotic tool whos gonna lose in the end but lets just enjoy him while he lasts lets enjoy the flame wars, the rivalry, the faction killing cause when hes gone we all go back to the way things were back to killing no name demons etc etc

    trassk just let loose and enjoy your dark side sometimes, loosen up my friend you are a orc after all dont you feel a little bit of the demon blood in your veins, the sound of the drums of war ringing in your ears

    if you dont then i advise that you reroll

  2. #202
    Deleted
    I dont really care who leads, it`s just a game :P

  3. #203
    Look at all these Garrosh posts every day. i can't believe how well of a job Blizz has done with him. People are constantly having to talk about him, he has be one of those most discussed characters in world of warcraft lore at this point.

  4. #204
    Deleted
    I dont really care who leads horde!

  5. #205
    Quote Originally Posted by iamthedevil View Post
    Look at all these Garrosh posts every day. i can't believe how well of a job Blizz has done with him. People are constantly having to talk about him, he has be one of those most discussed characters in world of warcraft lore at this point.
    My point exactly

    when you create a character that is so universally hated and loved you know you have done something right

  6. #206
    I am Murloc! Terahertz's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Your basement
    Posts
    5,177
    Havent played much during wotlk so I didnt really follow the lore back then. But seeing from in-game lore he seems to be some sort of celebrity being guarded by many guards while he tries to win the hearts of the people while during barely nothing. This is just how I see him.

    Every encounter with him he came from a portal, did something minor (he removed the corrupted leader in stonetalon mountains which was OK) left his guards and teleported back to Orgrimmar.

    It's just so unfortunate that Blizzard didn't do more with him in Cataclysm. Because honestly, he did next to nothing, at least that is in the eyes of someone who hasn't read the novels. This is from in-game experience.

  7. #207
    ive played through the entire domination point questline on the ptr so judge him when you have completed that

    you may change your mind about him or you may hate him even more but he does make his point across in what he is trying to achieve

  8. #208
    Like many of Blizzard's worst characters, his personality keeps on doing backflips without any explanation whatsoever. It's not that he's an asshole - it's that he's an inconsistent asshole. The entirety of his appearances in Cataclysm worked towards showing that he can actually be rational and slightly more moderate when the situation calls for it; Stonetalon was the moment where we realize that he is ruthless, but not necessarily amoral. And then what happens? Without any character development to explain it, he's suddenly a-okay with attacking neutral parties, flattening entire cities (with or without civilians) and doing some incredibly shady stuff with his Dark Shaman. His development is infuriatingly erratic.

    There's other irritating bits about the character; it's never explained why he hates the Alliance on such a deep personal level despite his absence from all of the prior Orc/Human wars, his tirade at Sylvanas amounted to absolutely nothing except an excuse to use the word "bitch" in-game, and his refusal to even entertain the idea of peace is one of the hallmarks of a terrible leader. All of this is compounded by the mystery of why the hell Thrall chose him, let alone a Hellscream at all, to be the absolute leader of the Horde; it doesn't take a genius to work out that Garrosh would go against all of his wishes, and it's not like he'd be denying some kind of rightful heir. Blizzard has done a pretty awful job with the character on the whole.

    You shouldn't expect much from an MMO's story, but everything about Garrosh is just badly done. Icing on the cake is that they already gave out spoilers about his fall. That would have a hell of a lot more impact if we weren't tapping out foot over the course of the expansion just waiting for it. Seriously, who spoils the ending of their own game?

    Anyway, long story short, I don't hate him because he's the kind of person I wouldn't be buddies with. I hate him as a character because he's poorly written.

    ---------- Post added 2012-11-11 at 12:56 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Combooticus View Post
    ive played through the entire domination point questline on the ptr so judge him when you have completed that

    you may change your mind about him or you may hate him even more but he does make his point across in what he is trying to achieve
    If it's that "I won't let my people starve in the desert" thing, I don't buy it. It's never even been established that his people are starving in the desert. Seems like one of the writers was just pulling an excuse for his dickery out of their ass.
    Last edited by Eats Compost; 2012-11-11 at 01:01 PM.

  9. #209
    Stood in the Fire
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    450
    I really dislike Garrosh, if he had someone like Sylvanas or Voljin as a trusted adviser always at his side hed be a much better warchief.
    Crushing the alliance scum is important but being such a stupid oaf about it is not in the best interest of the horde.

  10. #210
    Quote Originally Posted by Eats Compost View Post
    If it's that "I won't let my people starve in the desert" thing, I don't buy it. It's never even been established that his people are starving in the desert. Seems like one of the writers was just pulling an excuse for his dickery out of their ass.
    Actually, yes, Orgrimmar did suffer a famine pre-Cataclysm (listen to the dialogue from General Krom'gar as he addresses his troops in the fortress. "Your families no longer starve, your loved ones live with with shelter over their heads" is the exact line). Namely, the Alliance invading the Barrens and cutting off the supply of grain and fresh water to Orgrimmar caused the city to have severe shortages of food and drinkable water until another route could be established by going through the Stonetalon Mountains (see: Baine's short story). Its not like Durotar is suitable for agriculture and the Southfury River is polluted from the workshops in Azshara.

    It still doesn't excuse the fact that when he says "my people", he only means the orcs. The trolls, the goblins, and other Horde races that lived in Orgrimmar can go stuff themselves. They starved too. And in fact, we actively stole from the Darkspear during Cataclysm.

  11. #211
    I can't believe I am seeing another pathetic excuse to make Garrosh likable to us. All those Garrosh fangirls who are a minority and their opinion doesn't matter anymore have to understand that Garrosh is finished, done, finito, caput and generally dead.

    As Trassk said Blizzard has done a very bad job with the son of Grom. The number of threads regarding Garrosh doesn't prove that he is a good character just because some hate him and very very very few like him.

    If you see the whole MMO Champion there isn't a single thread discussing if Garrosh is a bad leader. All you can see is threads from fangirls saying how awesome Garrosh is only to be silenced by the majority. Get it through your thick skulls. We don't care about Garrosh. He is a failure and his chapter will end in Orgrimmar.

    Now on to the other matter. Garrosh destroyed everything Thrall worked for.

    When Thrall came to power all the Orcs were enslaved, pretty much every Alliance and Neutral Faction wanted to kill them. What did Thrall did? He changed that Horde into an honorable War Machine helping against Archimonde and helping against other threats during Vanilla, TBC and Wrath of the Lich King. The Alliance knew that with Thrall on the Mantle of Warchief they could be trusted at least more than now with Garrosh. He also worked his reputation with the various Neutral Factions in the game and estalished trade routes with them so his people could have the nessesary to survive. He also accepted all the various refugees into the Horde like the Forsaken believing that everyone deserves a second chance.

    Garrosh then comes to power. What does he do? First he spits the proposal of peace with anything non Horde. He disrespects the work of Thrall and his wisdom and challenges him to a duel before the Lich King's attack (I'm talking about the incident where Thrall told Garrosh that he will not go unprepared to a war against the Lich King).
    Then he wants to attack the Alliance instead of Arthas ,he causes havoc in Dalaran, he disrespects Tirion and generally every neutral faction in Northrend not to mention causing havoc in the Argent Tournament and then sends his Warsong Clan to attack the Alliance from behind while fighting the Scourge resulting in the death of both of them.

    Once Cataclysm arrives he goes into the next level. He attacks Neutral Factions and nations which had nothing to do with his war (Gilneas, Cenarion Circle Tree, The attack to kill all the Alliance leaders in Ashenvale along with Malfurion who was a leader of the Cenarion Circle) resulting in those turning against him. Uses the Cataclysm to his advantage as Wrathon said. Also enlists the Dragonmaw into the Horde and with this action he is now an enemy of the Red Dragonflight due to the past with the Dragonmaw. His ally Sylvannas uses the situation to turn his Forsaken into a new Scourge which in turn will turn the eyes of the Argent Crusade and the Knights of the Ebon Blade upon the Horde in a hostile level (For information see the subfaction inside those two factions called The Brotherhood of The Light. They are preparing to do something against the Forsaken and their plans will start after you get Stratholme which may use as a base of operations in the future). Three more possible enemies.

    Then MOP arrives and he goes to the final level. Decides that he has to win with every means nessesary. Attacks literally now without remorsevarious Neutral Factions to gain an advantage. Gains the Focusing Iris after killing some of the Blues. Then waits for the Alliance to gather. He also waits for the Kirin Tor and Kalecgos to gather as Garrosh is now in the point where everyone is a threat to him. He tries to kill them with a Bomb. Then he uses Dalaran to steal an artifact. The end result of those was to make two more enemies in the faces of the Blue Dragonflight and the Kirin Tor. Enlists the remaining Twilight Cult in order to summon him the remains of the Ragnaros Forces. Combine it with the occupation of the Echo Isles which forces Thrall the leader of the Earthen Ring to interfere and you get the point. One more neutral faction turned against the Horde.

    So in general Garrosh is fighting a war he simply cannot win. A needless war. In the end he will be his Horde against the more than ever united Alliance and all the Neutral Factions in the game along with the Horde rebels.

    Doesn't matter what you say. The game is over. All those I love Garrosh threads are pointless. Thrall may have made the mistake of giving leadership to an incompetent idiot but he will have a gain in the end. Garrosh with all those Horde fangirls that want war will die in Orgrimmar and the Horde will finally be purified of their warmongering taint.

  12. #212
    He still had potential to become a second Doomhammer at the start of Cata, but now that Blizz has decided his story ends as a nazi I don't like him anymore and think someone else ought to take his place. An orc who understands the benefits of diplomacy, but doesn't shy away from action when it is needed and always has the best interests of his people at heart.

  13. #213
    Warchief Szemere's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Gnomeregan
    Posts
    2,193
    Wish I could vote for both option 1 and 4 but...

    Horde is supposed to be a Horde. Aggressive towards outsiders. His moves against Vol'jin are the only ones I frown upon (him fighting vs Bloodhoof was without the intent to kill anyways, it's not like he hates the Tauren), but I think he does quite well, and in his current state (that people seem to hate), I think he's in a much better state than Thrall's current state (which people seem to like over the pre-4.0 thrall for some strange reason), which IMO only went backwards since he left the position of warchief (in terms of mental state and image). Sure, Garrosh didn't improve much, but he does just fine IMO, and there currently is no reason for the Horde to hate him. The only real moment where we're SUPPOSED to start hating him, is when he gets corrupted due to trying to abuse the Sha in his favor (him getting corrupted by that is not fact yet, him trying to abuse the Sha in his favor is). Even the rumours that he's supposed to be killing a certain someone, if those are true, I would still not care, any good leader of the Horde would/should do just that IMO: It's war.

    TLDR: He's fine, just a tad aggressive towards Voljin, and the real reason why we would want to hate/kill him by the end of the xpac is not in the game yet, so I really don't get all the Garrosh hate.
    Ex-GM and Raidleader of the MoX Purple Kittens Raidteam on Twisting Nether (formerly Grim Batol), RIP, Winter 2010 - Spring 2013.
    Armory. WoWProgress. Might start streaming Soon(tm) http://twitch.tv/szem/

  14. #214
    Garrosh is primitive, violent and stupid.

    Orcs from Draenor were a tribal people, with strong honorable ties to the elements and reverence for the land and it's inhabitants.

    This "new horde" is a shameful dirt on the rich history and culture of the Draenor Orcs...

  15. #215
    Warchief Tydrane's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,078
    My option for the poll wasn't there: "I loathe Garrosh, because despite having the potential to be a really awesome character (Grom Hellscream's son!), he's been terribly mishandled, turning out to be nothing but a rash, insolent blowhard who has learned nothing from the past - neither his own, nor the Orcs in general."
    Quote Originally Posted by Steampunkette View Post
    Didn't help that he had Sky Admiral Warcrimes McEvillaugh flying his airship for him.
    hi im tydrane from dranasuss

  16. #216
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Inahu View Post
    My option for the poll wasn't there: "I loathe Garrosh, because despite having the potential to be a really awesome character (Grom Hellscream's son!), he's been terribly mishandled, turning out to be nothing but a rash, insolent blowhard who has learned nothing from the past - neither his own, nor the Orcs in general."
    You mean just like Grom?

  17. #217
    Gamon for Warcheif!

  18. #218
    Quote Originally Posted by Nindoriel View Post
    You mean just like Grom?
    But...but Grom had a brief moment of clarity where he made up for all the bad things he did by killing Mannoroth and dying! There's actually a quote from a book I'm reading that I'll paraphrase here.

    "Do you believe that when a man has spent a lifetime doing evil, but does something good with his last moments, that makes up for it all?"

    *Character thinks for a moment, then replies* "No."

    "Neither do I." *Proceeds to then go and die nobly after a lifetime of wickedness*

  19. #219
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Florena View Post
    But...but Grom had a brief moment of clarity where he made up for all the bad things he did by killing Mannoroth and dying! There's actually a quote from a book I'm reading that I'll paraphrase here.

    "Do you believe that when a man has spent a lifetime doing evil, but does something good with his last moments, that makes up for it all?"

    *Character thinks for a moment, then replies* "No."

    "Neither do I." *Proceeds to then go and die nobly after a lifetime of wickedness*
    That sounds familiar, which book is it?
    Totally agree that Grom redeemed himself in the end, just pointing out that Garrosh is a lot like his father. We'll see if he redeems himself too.

  20. #220
    Quote Originally Posted by Nindoriel View Post
    That sounds familiar, which book is it?
    Totally agree that Grom redeemed himself in the end, just pointing out that Garrosh is a lot like his father. We'll see if he redeems himself too.
    Well the quote actually raises the question of whether a noble final act can redeem all the evil in one's life, and the answer given is 'no, it doesn't.' Not sure I 100% agree with this perspective, but it adds an interesting topic to characters like Grom and Darth Vader. Does that final act of sacrifice really redeem them?

    The book is The Black Prism, first in Brent Week's Lightbringer trilogy. But I've only just started reading it, and I'm sore other books have raised that question long before this one.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •