1. #2521
    Quote Originally Posted by Laize View Post
    But it is about equal rights. Women have an out because of biology. Laws exist to smooth out differences in biology (ie. I'm stronger than you but I'm not allowed to hit you.). Ergo - men should have an out too.
    they have equal rights to an existing child.

    they dont have equal rights to a non existant one.

    would you like to argue for mens rights to fetuses?

  2. #2522
    Quote Originally Posted by DuckieMage View Post
    The problem is actually, "women are forced to have children they do not want."
    Get your head in the game here, we are not talking about abortion.

  3. #2523
    Quote Originally Posted by Laize View Post
    But it is about equal rights. Women have an out because of biology. Laws exist to smooth out differences in biology (ie. I'm stronger than you but I'm not allowed to hit you.). Ergo - men should have an out too.
    The law exists to smooth out inequality that has no basis. Like inequality based on skin color. The advantages women have are based on real differences between women and men, not superficial things like race.

  4. #2524
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by DuckieMage View Post
    The problem is actually, "women are forced to have children they do not want."
    Oh boy you're going to have to explain that.

  5. #2525
    Quote Originally Posted by darenyon View Post
    they have equal rights to an existing child.

    they dont have equal rights to a non existant one.

    would you like to argue for mens rights to fetuses?
    So now the argument is "The woman just kills it so the problem goes away, but if she lets it live you have to pay."?

    I don't buy that.

  6. #2526
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Wells View Post
    The law exists to smooth out inequality that has no basis. Like inequality based on skin color. The advantages women have are based on real differences between women and men, not superficial things like race.
    And the advantages men have, what about those?

  7. #2527
    Quote Originally Posted by Laize View Post
    But it is about equal rights. Women have an out because of biology. Laws exist to smooth out differences in biology (ie. I'm stronger than you but I'm not allowed to hit you.). Ergo - men should have an out too.
    Ideas based on the 'women are different' is now called Anti-feminism.
    The last time 'Difference Feminism' was acceptable was Muller V Oregon that gave the state the right to limit women's hours to 10 a day on the idea that 'more work could damage the uterus'.

    Men have the right to Opt out- The opt out is literally, don't have sex unless you understand the implication that having sex could lead to pregnancy.
    It is seriously that simple.
    They tell women the same thing, "You had sex and got pregnant? Your fault because you didn't think about what could happen after."
    I literally won't have sex [despite having BC] because I'm afraid I could get pregnant and it will ruin my plans and I don't wan children.
    Friends: Will help you move.
    Best Friends: Will help you move the Bodies

  8. #2528
    Quote Originally Posted by Wells View Post
    The law exists to smooth out inequality that has no basis. Like inequality based on skin color. The advantages women have are based on real differences between women and men, not superficial things like race.
    The law exists to do whatever the fuck we want it to. I say it should exist to give men an option to not be fathers when they're not ready.

    But you know what? I'm fine with baby steps.

    $200/month or 5% of take-home income. Whichever is less..

  9. #2529
    Quote Originally Posted by Laize View Post
    The law exists to do whatever the fuck we want it to.
    This might be the fastest and most blatant goal post shift I've ever seen on this board.

  10. #2530
    Quote Originally Posted by DuckieMage View Post
    Ideas based on the 'women are different' is now called Anti-feminism.
    The last time 'Difference Feminism' was acceptable was Muller V Oregon that gave the state the right to limit women's hours to 10 a day on the idea that 'more work could damage the uterus'.

    Men have the right to Opt out- The opt out is literally, don't have sex unless you understand the implication that having sex could lead to pregnancy.
    It is seriously that simple.
    They tell women the same thing, "You had sex and got pregnant? Your fault because you didn't think about what could happen after."
    I literally won't have sex [despite having BC] because I'm afraid I could get pregnant and it will ruin my plans and I don't wan children.
    Sure. Because abstinence-only education works like a charm. Let's do that again.

  11. #2531
    Quote Originally Posted by Lolercaust View Post
    Get your head in the game here, we are not talking about abortion.
    I'm pretty sure I'm still on the idea that 'men have the right to be a father even if they woman doesn't want it.'
    Unless we've moved on and agreed that the man doesn't have the right to force the woman to carry a pregnancy to term on the bases he wants the child?
    Friends: Will help you move.
    Best Friends: Will help you move the Bodies

  12. #2532
    Quote Originally Posted by Wells View Post
    This might be the fastest and most blatant goal post shift I've ever seen on this board.
    It's not a goal shift. It's a fact. It's also the entire basis for my belief that men should have an out analogous to women.

  13. #2533
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by DuckieMage View Post
    I'm pretty sure I'm still on the idea that 'men have the right to be a father even if they woman doesn't want it.'
    Unless we've moved on and agreed that the man doesn't have the right to force the woman to carry a pregnancy to term on the bases he wants the child?
    What in the actual fuck are you talking about?

  14. #2534
    Quote Originally Posted by Laize View Post
    So now the argument is "The woman just kills it so the problem goes away, but if she lets it live you have to pay."?

    I don't buy that.
    the argument is "you must first have rights to give them up".

    so, tell us what rights men should have to fetuses and why.

  15. #2535
    Laws exist to smooth out differences in biology
    The law exists to do whatever the fuck we want it to.
    Yup clearly nothing has changed.
    Quote Originally Posted by Laize View Post
    It's also the entire basis for my belief that men should have an out analogous to women.
    Your entire argument is based on the idea that the law can do whatever the fuck we want it to?

  16. #2536
    Quote Originally Posted by Laize View Post
    Sure. Because abstinence-only education works like a charm. Let's do that again.
    I'm not talking abstinence only education. I'm pretty damn sure you said that even with BC, there is still situation that arise where the woman gets pregnant and the man is forced to support it.
    The answer would be, "Don't have sex with that woman. Make sure that if you have sex, you two agree what should happen if the BC fails and pregnancy occurs."
    Friends: Will help you move.
    Best Friends: Will help you move the Bodies

  17. #2537
    Sometimes my nads stick to my undies.

  18. #2538
    Quote Originally Posted by DuckieMage View Post
    I'm not talking abstinence only education. I'm pretty damn sure you said that even with BC, there is still situation that arise where the woman gets pregnant and the man is forced to support it.
    The answer would be, "Don't have sex with that woman. Make sure that if you have sex, you two agree what should happen if the BC fails and pregnancy occurs."
    And if she agrees to abort the child if pregnancy occurs, pregnancy occurs and she decides not to abort?

  19. #2539
    Quote Originally Posted by Wells View Post
    Do you see the double standard you're employing here? And its still no burden for anyone. That's what abortion results in. No burden for anyone. Why is irrelevant.
    There is no double standard. Both men and women have the choice to support the child, or not support the child. The woman can opt out from the get-go. If the man opts out and the woman decides she can't support the baby, she's free to opt out then as well.

    The only time a man has no say in the creation of a child is if he's raped or tricked and I'm fine with him not paying support in either case.
    I'm talking about post-conception.

    Ah yes that real world where women are tricking dudes left and right. If you're this paranoid ask for proof.
    Who said anything about malicious intentions? I'm referring to the dynamic nature of humanity in that positions can change in light of new information. It's in the same vein as women deciding they want to forego an abortion after seeing their child on the ultrasound monitor.

    saying "i'm not going to take care of the child" while its a fetus does not mean its not your child anymore when its bored.
    Biologically it's still your child, but legally and financially it's not.

    Whether you want to results of a decision you make or not is irrelevant on whether you bear responsibility for the outcomes of said decision.
    ...right. And we're asking for an opt-out from that responsibility.

  20. #2540
    Quote Originally Posted by darenyon View Post
    the argument is "you must first have rights to give them up".

    so, tell us what rights men should have to fetuses and why.
    No rights to fetuses. Men should simply have an analogous option to women. Obviously we can't do a coat-hanger and some bleach. But there are other legal remedies we can have made available.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •