Mega-Thread: Gun Control Thread

[TZucchini]

You're the one using the word "exclude."

Me: "What about age-adjusting makes you think that they exclude the elderly or children?"

You: "That's what 'age adjusting' is."

Me: "lawl you wrong Tiny, but you won't admit it!"

Maybe one day you'll move on to something more challenging that is higher than what a middle school student learns. I believe in you!

EL OH EL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why the ninja-edit Tiny? Did you realize what you said was full of shit?

I recall you criticizing others for deleting their posts. What a hypocrite...

There's nothing funny about deleting posts and lying.

lololol feels good.

[Tinykong]

Me: "What about age-adjusting makes you think that they exclude the elderly or children?"

You: "That's what 'age adjusting' is."

Me: "lawl you wrong Tiny, but you won't admit it!"

Excluding some of those people is not the same thing as excluding certain age groups.

EL OH EL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why the ninja-edit Tiny? Did you realize what you said was full of shit?

I recall you criticizing others for deleting their posts. What a hypocrite...

What post was deleted? You quoted it.

lololol feels good.

[TZucchini]

There's nothing funny about deleting posts and lying. Nothing funny at all.

[Tinykong]

There's nothing funny about deleting posts and lying. Nothing funny at all.

Luckily no one is deleting posts.

[TZucchini]

Nothing funny about lying.

[Mayhem]

Reread my previous post about when to draw the line on new regulations.

I guess the answer would be trying with reasonable regulations to accomplish the least amount of firearm deaths possible, but gunners seem to come back to banning all the time, i don´t know why.

[Tinykong]

Nothing funny about lying.

What post was deleted? You quoted the post, clearly it hasn't been deleted.

[lockedout]

I've already produced multiple studies that thoroughly debunk this myth.

It's funny that scientists don't "believe" their studies yet you sing them like gospel. In Japan people will commit suicide without guns AND have a 80+% rate at doing so. What do your studies say about that?

- - - Updated - - -

There's nothing funny about deleting posts and lying. Nothing funny at all.

You should tell that to your buddy.

[Tinykong]

The best part is, no post was deleted. He's made a futile attempt at an insult by trying to claim I'm being a hypocrite, while quoting the very post he's claiming was deleted.

I think he's said it best:

"bwahahahahaha"

[TZucchini]

What post was deleted? You quoted the post, clearly it hasn't been deleted.

You posted this: "Maybe one day you'll move on to something more challenging that is higher than what a middle school student learns. I believe in you!"

Then you deleted it.

You deleted a post.

After criticizing others for doing the same.

Lol. Not a good day for you Tiny.

[Tinykong]

You posted this: "Maybe one day you'll move on to something more challenging that is higher than what a middle school student learns. I believe in you!"

Then you deleted it.

You deleted a post.

After criticizing others for doing the same.

Lol. Not a good day for you Tiny.

Do you understand what you're comparing to?

Someone posting "I own a gun" and then going back later and deleting the post and claiming they never said it.

No post here was deleted. You quoted it, and it's clearly still visible. That's not "deleting a post."

[TZucchini]

It's funny that scientists don't "believe" their studies yet you sing them like gospel. In Japan people will commit suicide without guns AND have a 80+% rate at doing so. What do your studies say about that?

Japan? Ask Tiny about using data from other countries...It's strictly prohibited...because...reasons?

Anyway, the studies find that reducing access to lethal means of suicide reduces the suicide rate. The studies dispel the myth of "replacement suicide" by other means.

- - - Updated - - -

That's not "deleting a post."

You posted something. Then you deleted it.

You deleted a post. It really is that simple.

[Tinykong]

Japan? Ask Tiny about using data from other countries...It's strictly prohibited...because...reasons?

...because reasons like: citing a study that says "passing laws in Australia reduced crime" and saying "that means it will work in the United States" is false.

Or, are you using one of those "highly scientific processes" to arrive at this conclusion?

- - - Updated - - -

You posted something. Then you deleted it.

You deleted a post. It really is that simple.

The post is still there. Do you not know what happens when someone deletes a post?

[lockedout]

You posted this: "Maybe one day you'll move on to something more challenging that is higher than what a middle school student learns. I believe in you!"

Then you deleted it.

You deleted a post.

After criticizing others for doing the same.

Lol. Not a good day for you Tiny.

So he edited his post realizing you would probably report him for what he said?
Not the same as stating you own guns then deleting the post pretending you never said it and report anyone who quotes it saying they misquoted you because you never said that. Obviously someone is embarrassed they admitted they own unregistered firearms while taking such a strong stance against anyone else owning unregistered firearms. It's called being a hypocrite and do as I say not as I do. Typical for that crowd.

- - - Updated - - -

Do you not know what happens when someone deletes a post?

I bet there is someone in this thread that does.

- - - Updated - - -

The studies dispel the myth of "replacement suicide" by other means.

You would have to remove all guns from the equation which is impossible in America, that's why you look at Japan where no one has a gun yet they have a higher suicide success rate.

- - - Updated - - -

access to lethal means of suicide reduces the suicide rate

Only guns are lethal or are they just more lethal-er.

[Tinykong]

You can't compare Japan's suicide rate to the US because it's raw data that hasn't been put through a "highly scientific process."

[lockedout]

hasn't been put through a "highly scientific process."

Even if it had us Anti Vaxxers wouldn't be able to understand such a process anyway.

[Tinykong]

Even if it had us Anti Vaxxers wouldn't be able to understand such a process anyway.

This is what I picture when I read someone talking about "highly scientific processes" and "scientific study results"

[lockedout]

This is what I picture when I read someone talking about "highly scientific processes" and "scientific study results"

I always thought it was this guy. http://i1287.photobucket.com/albums/...ps2942aa4e.jpg

[Eroginous]

Is that a guy? Or a bear wearing a skin suit?

I guess the answer would be trying with reasonable regulations to accomplish the least amount of firearm deaths possible, but gunners seem to come back to banning all the time, i don´t know why.

Or we could have a few independent organizations break down the firearm deaths by type so we can see what the major cause of firearm death is, then make a decision that will actually impact the major cause. Throwing legislation at a wall to see what sticks is a terrible idea. We aren't monkeys and this thread has had enough-shit slinging already.

[Mayhem]

Or we could have a few independent organizations break down the firearm deaths by type so we can see what the major cause of firearm death is, then make a decision that will actually impact the major cause. Throwing legislation at a wall to see what sticks is a terrible idea. We aren't monkeys and this thread has had enough-shit slinging already.

What you mean with or? What part of reasonable regulations sounded unreasonable to you that made you post this answer?