On a personal level. Sincerely this whole is a sweet deal because he offered he reduced rent in exchange for sex. Not her fault she said yes how about pressure it ever occur to anyone that its morally wrong to try to pressure a woman to sleep with you in exchange for something. That is almost the defined meaning behind exploiting someone you are taking advantage of them
No doubt some people interested in this because it fills some sort of pent house magazine to some people.
Why is this guy's brother considered such a horrible guy while an overwhelming majority of this forum approves of prostitution?
She agreed to it so...
My Gaming Setup | WoW Paladin (retired)
"This is not a dress. This is a sacred robe of the ancient psychedelic monks."
I see. So what you're getting it is that when given the choice to either have sex or be unable to pay your rent, she would choose sex thinking that's the best choice for her. But you, as an outside observer, (presumably) older and not under such stress, you believe that is not the best choice for her and she shouldn't have taken it. Is this correct?
hope she find a Bf that can beat the shit out of your brother.
Nothing wrong here. My ex wife basically slept with me and lived rent free.
I can believe that the story is real (it would be nothing new, actually).
That means you should beat the shit out of your brother.
I am pretty sure there was something in the criminal law that forbids your brothers actions.
BUUUUUTTTT, judging by the OP's threads, imho, he is a pretty good troll.
Don't see what the big deal is here. Seems like a win/win for both people.
That is correct. I am not in such a desperate position so I am able to look at her situation from a distance. It's clear she doesn't want to have sex with this man, but feels compelled to because of her financial situation. Remember that sex is not an activity to be taken lightly. If a person has to sell it to make ends meet, that is a very serious problem. Bodily autonomy is one of the only natural rights a person has, so it shouldn't have to come down to losing your bodily autonomy to make ends meet, which is why the Law protects people from that.
I know where you're going with this, so let me stop you right there. She is not in the best position to decide what is best for herself because she is DESPERATE. Her rationality has been compromised, clearly, because a person with their free will still intact would not opt to have sex with someone they would otherwise not wish to.
That is also definitely true.
Oh, I wasn't really going anywhere with it, I was just trying to genuinely understand your stance. If you can argue a point that she is not making a decision in her own best interest (that is, that she SHOULDN'T have picked that choice and just let herself be evicted by lack of pay), then you could very well have a valid point.
So what we have to ask is this: is she making the best decision? Should she instead pick eviction (or continue paying, but I assume she is unable)? If we can objectively say that it is better for her (and her brother) to be evicted than to have sex with this guy, then we can say that he is doing something both morally and legally wrong.
However, if we objectively say that it's better for her to have sex a few times a month rather than make herself and her brother homeless, then he is doing her a (although small and still perverted) service.