Hehe, taking a snip of an entire paragraph, classy ^^
It's taken out of context, but I'll restate it here, for your peace of mind..
The first statement, was defending the accusation of Asc not having an effect on Crit, the rest of that posts shows how this is not a broad statement, but OP specific. (The OP wants and has Asc, he wants help, so i gave him the options)
The second statement, whilst taken out of its contextual paragraph, is a clause supporting the counterargument. I didn't imply Chi was more important, i simply refuted to your argument that IF you are after Chi gen only, getting Asc is useless.
See the difference, the first is to defend the OP (who will stay Asc) whilst the second is directed at your "correction".
Also, editing your posts after they have been posted and discussed, and quoting them back, afterwards with the changes made is quite funny to me as well
You can argue all you like, my initial post was catered to the OP specifically, you are creating problems thinking it was a broad statement, but w/e floats your boat