Thread: Cyberpunk 2077

  1. #2841
    Quote Originally Posted by Volatilis View Post
    I think this is the part you are overestimating. You shouldnt need top of the line specs just to make the game playable.
    You don't. The only one overestimating here is you. I run the game just fine on mostly high settings. Some are set to ultra. Some to lower. It is what ever settings that the game (or Geforce Experience) picked on start up and it runs fine. My GPU is a gtx 1080 factory overclocked by EVGA and CPU is the r5 3600x. The computer was just built a few months ago but my GPU is old.

    The game should be playable on consoles that it was marketed for. There isn't much excuse for most of the performance issues it has faced. But it isn't wrong to call them dated and expect the performance to be lower. Just like if you played the game with the minimum PC specs which lists a GTX 780 which was released in 2013.
    "Man is his own star. His acts are his angels, good or ill, While his fatal shadows walk silently beside him."-Rhyme of the Primeval Paradine AFC 54
    You know a community is bad when moderators lock a thread because "...this isnt the place to talk about it either seeing as it will get trolled..."

  2. #2842
    Quote Originally Posted by rhorle View Post
    I run the game just fine on mostly high settings.
    Ah heres the guy where pointing out reality is just mad blind hate. Like people passionate about games only want to tear them down to win points on a nearly dead forum based on an MMO that supports Bobby Koticks luxury yacht collection.

    I dont care how your game runs, I dont doubt some people strike it lucky and wont experience half the problems this game has through luck or through sheer power housing through the problems with near top of the line specs
    Comes a time when we all gotta die...even kings.

  3. #2843
    Quote Originally Posted by Wilfire View Post
    To you it's artistic. To me it's a company hiring a team of psychologists to exploit the human psyche. When sexual arousal happens in a natural context between two people, it's alright. When it happens because a piece of media has blatant oversexualized visuals, it's exploitation. Genital sliders fall squarely under softcore pornography.
    For someone who finds it so vulgar you won't play it you sure do spend a lot of time fixated on the subject. The only time it has appeared in game so far is when part of the story you are "naked" and the inventory screen displays it. Even when interacting with a sex worker it kept clothes on and didn't even show it. Though they were naked. You are thinking way to much about a customizable dong for a person who claims to find a vulgar.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Volatilis View Post
    Ah heres the guy where pointing out reality is just mad blind hate. Like people passionate about games only want to tear them down to win points on a nearly dead forum based on an MMO that supports Bobby Koticks luxury yacht collection.
    Everything you just posted is filled with hate and nothing to do with reality. All I did was point out how you don't need a top of the line rig, spending 2k+, in order to get good performance from the game. And what do you do? Rant about bobby kotick. So yes I think it is fine to point out how hate filled some posters are when all they do is hate just for the sake of hating.

    Again nothing I posted about my specs is top of the line. You keep ignoring stuff just so you can keep your hate narrative going. Sad.
    "Man is his own star. His acts are his angels, good or ill, While his fatal shadows walk silently beside him."-Rhyme of the Primeval Paradine AFC 54
    You know a community is bad when moderators lock a thread because "...this isnt the place to talk about it either seeing as it will get trolled..."

  4. #2844
    Quote Originally Posted by rhorle View Post



    Everything you just posted is filled with hate and nothing to do with reality. All I did was point out how you don't need a top of the line rig, spending 2k+, in order to get good performance from the game. And what do you do? Rant about bobby kotick. So yes I think it is fine to point out how hate filled some posters are when all they do is hate just for the sake of hating.

    Again nothing I posted about my specs is top of the line. You keep ignoring stuff just so you can keep your hate narrative going. Sad.
    Its ok, CD projekt red are not the saviors promised to gaming. You can be objective and say what they do well and what they dont do well.

    Because they do nail some parts of gaming but fall MASSIVELY short in other areas. And when you have other studios like naughty dog and from software actually raising the bar you dont need to be their knight in shiny armor.
    Comes a time when we all gotta die...even kings.

  5. #2845
    Quote Originally Posted by Volatilis View Post
    Its ok, CD projekt red are not the saviors promised to gaming. You can be objective and say what they do well and what they dont do well. Because they do nail some parts of gaming but fall MASSIVELY short in other areas. And when you have other studios like naughty dog and from software actually raising the bar you dont need to be their knight in shiny armor.
    How am I being a knight in shining armor just for pointing out that you are wrong? Are you that filled with hate that you can't admit you were wrong about the specs needed to get good performance from the game? It isn't white knighting to call out a liar. There are plenty of issues with the game and I even said that the performance on last gen consoles isn't right.

    You only see what you want so you can keep on hating. First towards the game. And now towards me. Truly sad.
    "Man is his own star. His acts are his angels, good or ill, While his fatal shadows walk silently beside him."-Rhyme of the Primeval Paradine AFC 54
    You know a community is bad when moderators lock a thread because "...this isnt the place to talk about it either seeing as it will get trolled..."

  6. #2846
    Quote Originally Posted by rhorle View Post
    How am I being a knight in shining armor just for pointing out that you are wrong? Are you that filled with hate that you can't admit you were wrong about the specs needed to get good performance from the game? It isn't white knighting to call out a liar. There are plenty of issues with the game and I even said that the performance on last gen consoles isn't right.

    You only see what you want so you can keep on hating. First towards the game. And now towards me. Truly sad.
    Shh shh, only dreams now.

    Imagine you are capable of giving an opinion without championing a game you are still in the glow of because it just came out.

    Try be objective and see how this game would be judged if it didnt have the witcher 3 hype behind it.
    Comes a time when we all gotta die...even kings.

  7. #2847
    So uh this is it? The second coming of gaming jesus, the ultima pinnacle of gaming history?

    Janky combat
    Super buggy
    Poorly optimized
    Useless crafting
    Hilariously imbalanced weapons
    The story... oh god the story. It's one cutscene about finger banging your granddaughter away from being a Bernie Sander campaign ad.

    What a dumpster.

  8. #2848
    I'm running on an old PC on low settings and much of that isn't a thing. Combat seems decent for a non-shooter, the few bugs I've seen are graphical in nature and could be tied to my old machine, crafting is far from useless and the cyberpunk genre has always been about the excesses of hyper-capitalism.

    Optimisation I can't comment on, though the size of the game is much smaller than expected, and I haven't run across enough weapons yet to judge if they are imbalanced.

    A dumpster? Hardly. It does require some tweaking and bug fixing but it is still a good game.

  9. #2849
    Quote Originally Posted by Volatilis View Post
    Shh shh, only dreams now.

    Imagine you are capable of giving an opinion without championing a game you are still in the glow of because it just came out.

    Try be objective and see how this game would be judged if it didnt have the witcher 3 hype behind it.
    I'd say it's a solid game with a great atmosphere, voice acting, graphics, sound, a decent storyline. Haven't encountered any bugs in my first 5 hours of gameplay, no performance issues either. Don't know about the hype, I didn't exactly follow the game and its development. It already feels like it was worth my money more than AC Valhalla.

  10. #2850
    Quote Originally Posted by Skulltaker View Post
    I'd say it's a solid game with a great atmosphere, voice acting, graphics, sound, a decent storyline. Haven't encountered any bugs in my first 5 hours of gameplay, no performance issues either. Don't know about the hype, I didn't exactly follow the game and its development. It already feels like it was worth my money more than AC Valhalla.
    that is good, there is defiantly a good game in here. Night city is quite amazing in scope and detail.

    But it needed another 3 months development. The constant delays even after promises of no more delays was a pretty obvious warning sign.
    Comes a time when we all gotta die...even kings.

  11. #2851
    Quote Originally Posted by Corvus View Post
    I'm running on an old PC on low settings and much of that isn't a thing. Combat seems decent for a non-shooter, the few bugs I've seen are graphical in nature and could be tied to my old machine, crafting is far from useless and the cyberpunk genre has always been about the excesses of hyper-capitalism.

    Optimisation I can't comment on, though the size of the game is much smaller than expected, and I haven't run across enough weapons yet to judge if they are imbalanced.

    A dumpster? Hardly. It does require some tweaking and bug fixing but it is still a good game.
    "Decent" "acceptable" "aaahhh just SOME *huge* bugs" "just sooooooome graphical issues" "It needs work"

    But but but but... its still good i swear!

    *corvus inserting CDPR's giant wang directly into their throat*

  12. #2852
    Quote Originally Posted by Caerrona View Post
    "Decent" "acceptable" "aaahhh just SOME *huge* bugs" "just sooooooome graphical issues" "It needs work"

    But but but but... its still good i swear!

    *corvus inserting CDPR's giant wang directly into their throat*
    I wanna link the gif of homer simpson chasing after his BBQ cooked pig saying "its just a little airbourne its still good!" but this site doesnt like gifs/meme's
    Comes a time when we all gotta die...even kings.

  13. #2853
    I've watched/read a lot of the game, but I chose not to buy it. Yet.

    Recent game releases have really made me switch to a mode of basically waiting 1-2 years with every new title. It gives me games for less money, with more content, better performance, fixed bugs, and possibly even cool mods and tweaks. I lose out on being "in the moment" with the "gaming community" but that honestly doesn't matter much to me. I'm also not really worried about story spoilers and the likes, or at least far less so than with books/movies/shows since there's more to the gaming experience than just the story.

    There's more games than I could ever play. I still haven't caught up to some of the titles from years ago. I don't mind waiting a year or two or three for this one.

  14. #2854
    Quote Originally Posted by Skulltaker View Post
    I'd say it's a solid game with a great atmosphere, voice acting, graphics, sound, a decent storyline. Haven't encountered any bugs in my first 5 hours of gameplay, no performance issues either. Don't know about the hype, I didn't exactly follow the game and its development. It already feels like it was worth my money more than AC Valhalla.
    I agree, + the music is amazing!!! I have encountered a few bugs though, nothing game breaking but have had to do a reload once and some odd glitches.

    I got a little over 102 hours into AC:V, I hope I can get that amount in this game, though that might require waiting for them to add ng+ mode in CP77, though this game is set up better for replayability unlike AC:V.

  15. #2855
    As someone who was hyped about the game without expecting it to cure cancer or whatever, in the few hours that I have played on my mid-spec PC from 4 years ago I am thoroughly enjoying the game and I find it to be well worth the purchase. It's not perfect, but then again I have never played a game and thought it was perfect. My issues are minor so far, while the only bug I have encountered is NPCs striking bizarre poses on the floor after I have killed them. The UI does the job for me, even though 1 thing I would love to be able to do is to modify the crosshair of your guns.

    Anyway, as plenty of other people have said, if you were not expecting the second coming of Jesus Christ and your machine can run it well, then it's a thoroughly enjoyable and quite ambitious in some aspects RPG. I look forward to further exploring what it has to offer and also trying different paths and builts

  16. #2856
    Quote Originally Posted by Caerrona View Post
    "Decent" "acceptable" "aaahhh just SOME *huge* bugs" "just sooooooome graphical issues" "It needs work"

    But but but but... its still good i swear!

    *corvus inserting CDPR's giant wang directly into their throat*
    I've played maybe an hour of Witcher 3, which is my total involvement with CDPR. Yeah, I don't fanboi, not after being betrayed by the likes of bioware and Bethesda in the past.

    Maybe it's cause I'm not trying to run it on ultra on a machine that can't handle it but I've yet to run into any major bugs in 8 or 9 hours and have had maybe half a dozen minor graphical glitches.

    And yes it does need some work, I'm not going to deny, but it isn't as bad as some are trying to make out. At least on PC. PS4 struggles a bit from what I've heard.

  17. #2857
    Quote Originally Posted by Volatilis View Post
    that is good, there is defiantly a good game in here. Night city is quite amazing in scope and detail.

    But it needed another 3 months development. The constant delays even after promises of no more delays was a pretty obvious warning sign.
    That I'd agree on. Some more polish here and there would not have done any harm. But then again, I'm giving the developers some leeway because of the pandemic. I think the game was overhyped. So far, it's still one of the best of 2020 for me, maybe the best, maybe even longer than that, but it is a very solid game well worth the money. That's good enough for me.

  18. #2858
    Brewmaster
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    1,322
    So after playing for 10h yesterday, and reaching Act 2 here's my "opinion" plus all the bugs I've encountered so far:

    1) Game is fun but I don't see what all the hype was about. I have over 50h on Assassins Creed Valhalla and the story/setting got me hooked to not stop playing it, but so far Cyberpunk has been ok'ish I guess (?)

    2) Story is super confusing and all over the place. Don't know if it's supposed to be this way, like Dune books where you're thrown into the fray of the action and you gradually understand the story as you play, but so far I'm so lost on the story and I don't feel any attachment to the characters. Like they go "Oh shit it's X" and I'm like "Ok? But who is he?". Don't know if we're supposed to know the story from a book or something that I'm not aware of before playing this.

    3) In terms of bugs I've bound a couple of them so far, no game breaking ones but only "immersion breaking" like

    a) characters all of a sudden turn to ventriloquism and don't move their mouths while speaking,

    b) objects are invisible on cinematics like you see a character leaning on something invisible and then a car materializes out of thin air

    c) changing vehicle camera is glitchy AF. When you have the camera set inside your vehicle you have to press the key to change the camera view more than 5 or 6 times for it to finally change to outside view, and in 90% of the cases,it quickly goes through all the different camera views and goes back to inside the car, as if it got stuck on a loop and starts to cycle all the camera views based on how many times I pressed the camera change button.

    d) Sound is weird AF too. When you're driving and destroy a barrier or hit a car or a pedestrian, there's no sound for it, only the driving sound as if you're still on the road. Also in some cinematics, some sounds don't happen when they should and they all start playing at the same time at the end of the cinematic. How all these bugs that are typical of a very pre-alpha game got to the release version is beyond me.

    All in all, game is fun'ish I guess but I don't see the hype about it. You're safer buying AC Valhalla that offers you way more enjoyment for the same price, and more content. Fuck even Shadowlands has more enjoyment!
    Last edited by vitor210; 2020-12-11 at 10:13 AM.
    You don't understand. Having an unpayed full time job that no one appreciates is the magic of classic.

    It's about the journey. The journey into depression. The journey of running a daycare full of middle-aged alcoholics ignoring their SOs and avoiding social engagements to fulfill something they wanted 15 years ago before everyone realized it's not hard at all.

  19. #2859
    Quote Originally Posted by Caerrona View Post
    So uh this is it? The second coming of gaming jesus, the ultima pinnacle of gaming history?

    Janky combat
    Super buggy
    Poorly optimized
    Useless crafting
    Hilariously imbalanced weapons
    The story... oh god the story. It's one cutscene about finger banging your granddaughter away from being a Bernie Sander campaign ad.

    What a dumpster.
    doesnt matter because the game has been hyped up for 5+ years and propped up by every mainstream media and journalism, scoring 90+ on metacritic by every journalist gaming review outlet, game will be remebered and praised as one of the best games ever, it was already declared as one of the best games ever before it released
    Last edited by apelsinjuice; 2020-12-11 at 10:20 AM.

  20. #2860
    Quote Originally Posted by apelsinjuice View Post
    doesnt matter because the game has been hyped up for 5+ years and propped up by every mainstream media and journalism, scoring 90+ on metacritic by every journalist gaming review outlet, game will be remebered and praised as one of the best games ever, it was already declared as one of the best games ever before it released
    Shes like the titanic. Shes too big to sink! Never mind having the correct ratio of life boats to passenger!
    Comes a time when we all gotta die...even kings.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •