Aside from Homicides, which are by and large in isolated areas of cities with poor minorities away from everyone else, we aren't very bad.
http://www.civitas.org.uk/crime/crim...ecdjan2012.pdf
Note the trends
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr...e-data-table-8
I'm referring to the totality of the measures. For example:
I think those are strikingly unlikely to be particularly useful.7. Launch a national safe and responsible gun ownership campaign.
8. Review safety standards for gun locks and gun safes (Consumer Product Safety Commission).
--- Want any of my Constitutional rights?, ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
I come from a time and a place where I judge people by the content of their character; I don't give a damn if you are tall or short; gay or straight; Jew or Gentile; White, Black, Brown or Green; Conservative or Liberal. -- Note to mods: if you are going to infract me have the decency to post the reason, and expect to hold everyone else to the same standard.
"I can't own a gun this is the worst year ever!"
"Oh wait I can own a gun."
"WELL FUCK THE PRESIDENT I MUCH PREFER RACIST BIGOTED PRESIDENTS!"
--- Want any of my Constitutional rights?, ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
I come from a time and a place where I judge people by the content of their character; I don't give a damn if you are tall or short; gay or straight; Jew or Gentile; White, Black, Brown or Green; Conservative or Liberal. -- Note to mods: if you are going to infract me have the decency to post the reason, and expect to hold everyone else to the same standard.
By broadening the grounds for probable cause.
If it satisfies Aguilar-Spinelli, it's still valid today. They can also use grounds that DON'T meet that bar. "Totality-of-circumstances" is a broader, looser category, not a more restrictive one; it made it easier to get a warrant, not more difficult.
Plus, you're ignoring those other sources that directly contradict you, and citing stuff from that one source which does not corroborate your claim.
You're wrong about hearsay and probable cause. And you're wrong in implying that they couldn't search houses for illegal weapons, which again, was your original claim.
I feel maybe that all our debt was designed on purpose to destroy us. That would make the mega banks the secret rulers. Obama could be nothing but a front man, therefor all this blame on the president would mean you're falling for their trap quite nicely. The president just does as hes told and when everyone hates how things are going they just move in a new puppet to blame it on, then the real people never get caught. In this case he was reelected because people are so oblivious, and want more handouts. I actually believe the Democrat Republican system is just a scam that people dont realize yet to give americans the illusion of choice. There for we always fight amongst ourselves when everything inevitably goes bad by design. They're both controlled by the same higher power which isnt exposed to the public. Even if you think im crazy just think, if we could go back and reverse each nominated candidate and choose the opposite political party, we would have the same results. Time to get the real people behind everything out of there, they are destroying this country to take over it and when they have the guns its over. I know they arent banning them right now its a slow type of salami slicer process. Takes forever but its a guaranteed take over. So basically Obama and Romney were both puppets put in by who really controls our country. Most polls show Romney actually won but they can make Obama win through election fraud. Romney was just a place holder to look like the one that should have saved the country. Just gives people another 4 years to blame who should have voted for who when it does not matter at all. They were both nothing but puppets and the longer people believe in this left right stuff and think the president is the one behind how things are run, just keep arguing a meaningless battle while the real rulers sit back and laugh.
20 dead children and 6 dead adults certainly are a problem.
These executive orders are steps in the right direction.
The "no way in hell this is going to pass" assault weapons ban wasn't, and I really wish Obama had left that shit out of the speech regarding this, but nobody is perfect.
3DS Friend Code: 0146-9205-4817. Could show as either Chris or Chrysia.
--- Want any of my Constitutional rights?, ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
I come from a time and a place where I judge people by the content of their character; I don't give a damn if you are tall or short; gay or straight; Jew or Gentile; White, Black, Brown or Green; Conservative or Liberal. -- Note to mods: if you are going to infract me have the decency to post the reason, and expect to hold everyone else to the same standard.
im really curious what the practical use for an assault weapon is other then defending yourself which during something like a home intrusion can protect you from, not like you can take an assault weapon into town. if a mad man was able to get a gun id rather him have a handgun over an assault rifle
i live by one motto! "lolwut?"
Except all those have been debunked.
http://www.reddit.com/r/skeptic/comm...making/c7xjgzr
3DS Friend Code: 0146-9205-4817. Could show as either Chris or Chrysia.
--- Want any of my Constitutional rights?, ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
I come from a time and a place where I judge people by the content of their character; I don't give a damn if you are tall or short; gay or straight; Jew or Gentile; White, Black, Brown or Green; Conservative or Liberal. -- Note to mods: if you are going to infract me have the decency to post the reason, and expect to hold everyone else to the same standard.
That doesn't make them a federal public policy problem. A shitload more people die from things that are largely ignored all the time without drawing massive media and political attention.
---------- Post added 2013-01-16 at 06:58 PM ----------
Why? How'd that work out at Virginia Tech?
The laws aren't about preventing all criminal activity. People are acting like the purpose of these executive orders should be to prevent any future Sandy Hook events. That can't be done. There will always be a way to get past security with weapons, illegal or not.
The point is to make it difficult enough to limit occurrences like that, to make them as rare and exceptional as we possibly can, rather than allowing pretty much anyone to buy high-capacity semi-automatic weapons that are well-suited to such a massacre. Same reason you criminalize drugs and such; you don't do it to stop drugs, but to manage and reduce the damage they cause.
Saying "it could still happen again" is not proof that these aren't worthwhile changes, and it ignores the entire point. The aim is not just Sandy Hook style events. It's the general and much more widespread problem of gun violence in the USA.
No, my claim is that they cannot execute a search of private property based solely on hearsay. ACTUAL POLICE WORK is done BEFORE the judge grants a warrant. Honestly with as long as it took you to respond I expected a more solid argument other than you trying to twist my original statement to suit your needs.