Originally Posted by
jax
Lol, funny how I and many others have tried over and over to explain this (theres a 15 page post about this in hunters area and if you google "Sha Touched Weapon" there are hundreds of posts about this lack of drops) yet Lolofail still maintains his experience is the only true and factual one and all the rest of us are liars...
Yeah I tried to explain this same point but as you see, his view is the only one thats true, well...according to him.
So here you finally admit you have no idea what your talking about and clearly havent for the entire discussion! In fact your using someone else's words to argue your points as factual without checking to see if that person even has a clue... strong basis for your premise there genius...
/facepalm
Classic WoW forums backpedal and two step... Its not your job? So because you cant refute him, you claim you dont have to... pure genius, are you possibly a politician? If not, you have all the makings of one!
Its not his job to "prove" anything, its his and mine and others "opinions" that your experience does not match many peoples, yet you continue to argue that our experience is "statistically flawed and impossible" yet your using faulty data and letting that ignorance be colored by your own false perceptions to "prove" yours.
Talk about ass backward thinking...
Yet again another complete and total mistake... ok n/m... Ill call a spade a spade, your a flat out liar. Here is my "original premise" quoted from page 32:
I then several posts over after you argued that guilds dont need to run LFR to get gear, used my self as an example: 8/16 HM and still sitting with a 476 bow as an example of one person in a upper end guild that still needs to run LFR.
You have taken those facts and called me a liar, called others liars, and then fell back into "i dont have to disprove it, you have to prove it" yawnfest posts.
Why? The premise is that "upper end guilds" had to run and will continue to have to... no one said anything about top 100 or even 500.
Since I am the one that orginally said "upper end" then I would think it relates to what I feel "upper end" is and not what you want it to be.
That has been your problem from sentence number one, you took what I said and changed it around to fit your criteria then you said I was wrong because my premise didnt meet your altered narrow standards.
You then also called me a liar and said I was begging for pity...
Some people would call that narcissism... I consider it megalomania with a healthy dose of ignorance mixed in.