Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst
1
2
  1. #21
    Deleted
    Every time I see someone link to passmark I throw up a little in my mouth, it is so inaccurate that you can't take any number seriously. The GTX 690 is ranked below a GTX 580. GTX 590 is ranked below GTX 480.
    Yeah, fair enough. There are some serious inaccuracies with those cards I do agree.

  2. #22
    Deleted
    Resolution is 1920x1080.

  3. #23
    Deleted
    You only need to upgrade your GPU to get better performance. A 2500 should be sufficient.

    So for the GPU, in your case I would go for a 7850/7870 (XT)/660. Seeing as you dont play that much else, more power is probably wasted.
    I think the 7870 XT is probably your best bet, it has the price of a 7870, but is closer to the 7950 performance wise.

    Here is also a benchmark to see how the cards perform (the XT is not on the list). There have been new drivers out for both sides, but I think this is still the latest review/benchmark.

    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/A...rmance/20.html

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeara View Post
    Here is also a benchmark to see how the cards perform (the XT is not on the list). There have been new drivers out for both sides, but I think this is still the latest review/benchmark.

    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/A...rmance/20.html
    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/C...iti_LE/23.html

    This review is made with a 7870 XT (Tahiti LE).
    Intel i5-3570K @ 4.7GHz | MSI Z77 Mpower | Noctua NH-D14 | Corsair Vengeance LP White 1.35V 8GB 1600MHz
    Gigabyte GTX 670 OC Windforce 3X @ 1372/7604MHz | Corsair Force GT 120GB | Silverstone Fortress FT02 | Corsair VX450

  5. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by shroudster View Post
    i'd love so see some proof of that.
    im guessing low screen resolution/settings downscaled/solo areas only.
    1980x1080 multisampling even at 8x and q9550 is clocked @ 3,8ghz so it's not problem at all for 2008 computers. During raids FPS is between 30-60. Sadly I don't have proof now.

  6. #26
    Deleted
    So how is it that here:

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...k,3297-13.html

    the 7770 is said to be the best for MoP

    yet here:

    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/A...rmance/20.html

    It's seriously low ranked?

  7. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by FNM View Post
    So how is it that here:

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...k,3297-13.html

    the 7770 is said to be the best for MoP

    yet here:

    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/A...rmance/20.html

    It's seriously low ranked?
    Scroll down a bit on the first page and you will get to Ultra settings. the 7770 didn't even make that list.
    Intel i5-3570K @ 4.7GHz | MSI Z77 Mpower | Noctua NH-D14 | Corsair Vengeance LP White 1.35V 8GB 1600MHz
    Gigabyte GTX 670 OC Windforce 3X @ 1372/7604MHz | Corsair Force GT 120GB | Silverstone Fortress FT02 | Corsair VX450

  8. #28
    The Lightbringer Toffie's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    3,858
    Quote Originally Posted by FNM View Post
    So how is it that here:

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...k,3297-13.html

    the 7770 is said to be the best for MoP

    yet here:

    http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/A...rmance/20.html

    It's seriously low ranked?

    That is comparing media graphic cards, they are weak.
    8700K (5GHz) - Z370 M5 - Mugen 5 - 16GB Tridentz 3200MHz - GTX 1070Ti Strix - NZXT S340E - Dell 24' 1440p (165Hz)

  9. #29
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by shroudster View Post
    i'd love so see some proof of that.
    im guessing low screen resolution/settings downscaled/solo areas only.

    Hehe my old system was pretty much the same as his only with gtx 275's I could run ultra back then. Yea it's missing some dx11 features but yea its more than possible the q9950 is still a strong little chip tbh

  10. #30
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Stravs View Post
    Hehe my old system was pretty much the same as his only with gtx 275's I could run ultra back then. Yea it's missing some dx11 features but yea its more than possible the q9950 is still a strong little chip tbh
    in the past sure, however on gpu front i still got my doubts. (also weren't 275's more powerfull compared to that ati card?)

  11. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by shroudster View Post
    in the past sure, however on gpu front i still got my doubts. (also weren't 275's more powerfull compared to that ati card?)
    Only a tiny bit.
    Intel i5-3570K @ 4.7GHz | MSI Z77 Mpower | Noctua NH-D14 | Corsair Vengeance LP White 1.35V 8GB 1600MHz
    Gigabyte GTX 670 OC Windforce 3X @ 1372/7604MHz | Corsair Force GT 120GB | Silverstone Fortress FT02 | Corsair VX450

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •