Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ...
7
8
9
10
LastLast
  1. #161
    I am Murloc! Roose's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Tuscaloosa
    Posts
    5,040
    I do not see why there would be any opposition to this kind of transparency.

    To pull one of their moves, if you have nothing to hide then why fight it?

    Of course we do have something to hide. Our economy is only as strong as people think it is. So the bigger the illusion the better. Consumer confidence is fragile. That is why it is retarded to base an economy on it.

    The Fed is not the main problem. Letting crooks determine our economic policy is. Then letting their crook friends get off with a slap on the wrist. Only message that bankers got was that if they steal enough they are above the law.
    Last edited by Roose; 2013-02-06 at 07:34 PM.
    I like sandwiches

  2. #162
    Merely a Setback Reeve's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    28,800
    Quote Originally Posted by Roose View Post
    Of course we do have something to hide. Our economy is only as strong as people think it is. So the bigger the illusion the better. Consumer confidence is fragile. That is why it is retarded to base an economy on it.
    All economies where people can freely exchange currency for goods or services or choose not to are based on consumer confidence.
    'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
    Or a yawing hole in a battered head
    And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
    And there they lay I damn me eyes
    All lookouts clapped on Paradise
    All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!

  3. #163
    Quote Originally Posted by Reeve View Post
    They don't claim it's not occurring. No inflation at all would be a bad thing, in fact. They claim it's within 3% (the historical average is 3.36%), and it is. In December 2012, the inflation rate was 1.7%.
    Might want to check how much they have adjusted things like social security for inflation.
    The most successful tyranny is not the one that uses force to assure uniformity but the one that removes the awareness of other possibilities.

  4. #164
    Quote Originally Posted by Tinykong View Post
    Would have preferred "abolish the Federal Reserve, and return the gold standard."

    Won't be getting it.
    When you find enough gold, you let us know.

  5. #165
    I am Murloc! Roose's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Tuscaloosa
    Posts
    5,040
    Quote Originally Posted by Reeve View Post
    All economies where people can freely exchange currency for goods or services or choose not to are based on consumer confidence.
    And they are all flawed. I do not claim to know of the best system, but I do know that trying to convince someone that a piece of paper is worth something more than its tangible value is a tough feat.
    I like sandwiches

  6. #166
    Merely a Setback Reeve's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    28,800
    Quote Originally Posted by oblivionx View Post
    Might want to check how much they have adjusted things like social security for inflation.
    Feel free to enlighten me with some sort of source. My data came from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
    Or a yawing hole in a battered head
    And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
    And there they lay I damn me eyes
    All lookouts clapped on Paradise
    All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!

  7. #167
    The Insane Daelak's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    15,964
    Quote Originally Posted by Roose View Post
    And they are all flawed. I do not claim to know of the best system, but I do know that trying to convince someone that a piece of paper is worth something more than its tangible value is a tough feat.
    Well remember this; we have one of the largest workforces in the world, we have the largest tax base in the world, we have the largest/most sophisticated military in the world, and we are the reserve currency for all international business. In short it would take a apocalyptic scenario to shake the confidence global investors have in our ability to pay our debts, something our own conservative representatives and citizens doubt, because they want to see the US fail.
    Quote Originally Posted by zenkai View Post
    There is a problem, but I know just banning guns will fix the problem.

  8. #168
    Thank god. The fed was doing shit too long without supervision. The whole financial disaster started with Greenspan and his retardism. We need to fix his shit.

  9. #169
    Void Lord Doctor Amadeus's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    In Security Watching...
    Posts
    43,735
    One and very few times, as a Liberal I would agree with Republicans. This is long since overdue. Although I do tend to believe it has more to do with wasting time and trying to take digs at Obama, which makes me almost not want to support it, but I can't deny it would be nice if every nickel and dime had to be accounted for and show to the tax payers.
    Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis

  10. #170
    Quote Originally Posted by Reeve View Post
    Feel free to enlighten me with some sort of source. My data came from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    For the first time in history it was 0 for 2 straight years under Obama.

    That's not possible with him borrowing like he did.
    The most successful tyranny is not the one that uses force to assure uniformity but the one that removes the awareness of other possibilities.

  11. #171
    Merely a Setback Reeve's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    28,800
    Quote Originally Posted by oblivionx View Post
    For the first time in history it was 0 for 2 straight years under Obama.

    That's not possible with him borrowing like he did.
    So because Social Security didn't get a COLA for 2 straight years.... what?
    'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
    Or a yawing hole in a battered head
    And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
    And there they lay I damn me eyes
    All lookouts clapped on Paradise
    All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!

  12. #172
    Quote Originally Posted by Reeve View Post
    So because Social Security didn't get a COLA for 2 straight years.... what?
    They held inflation in check by merely claiming it wasn't occurring... When it obviously is.
    The most successful tyranny is not the one that uses force to assure uniformity but the one that removes the awareness of other possibilities.

  13. #173
    Merely a Setback Reeve's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    28,800
    Quote Originally Posted by oblivionx View Post
    They held inflation in check by merely claiming it wasn't occurring... When it obviously is.
    Again, you haven't shown that it obviously is at all.
    'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
    Or a yawing hole in a battered head
    And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
    And there they lay I damn me eyes
    All lookouts clapped on Paradise
    All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!

  14. #174
    Quote Originally Posted by Reeve View Post
    Again, you haven't shown that it obviously is at all.
    It's not possible to "print" as much money as they did from 2009 2010 (3 trillions dollars) and not have inflation.
    The most successful tyranny is not the one that uses force to assure uniformity but the one that removes the awareness of other possibilities.

  15. #175
    Merely a Setback Reeve's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX USA
    Posts
    28,800
    Quote Originally Posted by oblivionx View Post
    It's not possible to "print" as much money as they did from 2009 2010 (3 trillions dollars) and not have inflation.
    Why not? Inflation is the devaluation of currency. Value is determined by supply vs. demand. If demand for a currency increases and the supply doesn't, the value of the currency increases. If the demand for a currency increases (as has been happening since 2008), and the supply increases (as through quantitative easing, which only temporarily adds to the money supply, btw), then the value can remain constant.
    'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
    Or a yawing hole in a battered head
    And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
    And there they lay I damn me eyes
    All lookouts clapped on Paradise
    All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!

  16. #176
    The Insane Daelak's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    15,964
    Quote Originally Posted by oblivionx View Post
    It's not possible to "print" as much money as they did from 2009 2010 (3 trillions dollars) and not have inflation.
    So it was a governmental-wide conspiracy thrown in with all the financial firms which follow BLS statistics? Just stop, we are at below average inflation because our economy is not operating at it's capacity.
    Quote Originally Posted by zenkai View Post
    There is a problem, but I know just banning guns will fix the problem.

  17. #177
    Quote Originally Posted by Daelak View Post
    So it was a governmental-wide conspiracy thrown in with all the financial firms which follow BLS statistics? Just stop, we are at below average inflation because our economy is not operating at it's capacity.
    It never occurred in our history except in 2 years under Obama...
    The most successful tyranny is not the one that uses force to assure uniformity but the one that removes the awareness of other possibilities.

  18. #178
    You are absolutely right, it is all about politics and there is no real reason.

  19. #179
    Quote Originally Posted by lindagist View Post
    You are absolutely right, it is all about politics and there is no real reason.
    No real reason to necro a 6 year old thread either.

  20. #180
    Quote Originally Posted by Buckwald View Post
    And keeping oversight of monetary policy in "The Fed" is better? Most likely not.


    You mean what happens IF we found out it's business as usual? Should that be the case, then public policy, with regards to spending, taxes and budgeting in general, will be changed. But, it's good to know what EXACTLY we're working with.
    Actual economists oversee the Fed. It also acts as a separation of powers.

    This is the most socialistic/communistic bullshit I have ever heard of. Rand Paul should feel bad suggesting this, Republicans should feel bad, and you should feel bad OP for supporting this shit.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Calfredd View Post
    No real reason to necro a 6 year old thread either.
    Ugh. Do people not have better things to do...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •