I think both ally and horde will work together on that boss fight for lore reason, for example your guild lets say is Horde, you and your guildies will fight Garrosh along side 10/25 alliance NPCs.
I think both ally and horde will work together on that boss fight for lore reason, for example your guild lets say is Horde, you and your guildies will fight Garrosh along side 10/25 alliance NPCs.
Fact (because I say so): TBC > Cata > Legion > ShaLa > MoP > DF > BfA > WoD = WotLK
My pet collection --> http://www.warcraftpets.com/collection/FuxieDK/
i just wish blizz would fix the alliance leaders so they'd do something.. most of them just sit in their cities and are worthless.. the only one thats active tends to be Varian.
Garrosh is still active in the icc raid which is kinda funny.. since if he gets killed in 5.3 it'll be odd.. but thats in the past so w/e
honestly i dont mind if they destroyed some crappy horde cities.. orgrimmar is kinda eh.. Silvermoon city would be awesome if it was the capital and u could fly there.. undercity is w/e.. just a silly maze.
It's pretty simple really: If the alliance defeat the Horde outright, then they deserve the kill. If not then Horde deserve it.
The way I see things going, Garrosh will actually have the Alliance on the brink of defeat, and it will only be because of the Horde rebellion that the Alliance survives at all. Similarly, a Horde uprising would have no chance of success if Garrosh's primary efforts weren't focussed on destroying the Alliance.
Besides which, if there is to be any chance at a truce between the two factions - which has to happen unless one faction is wiped out (which cannot happen for gameplay reasons) - then it has to be Horde who deposes their corrupt leader. If the Alliance kill Garrosh it will merely perpetuate the cycle of reprisals between the two factions until one faction is utterly destroyed (as was hinted at in the final Isle of Thunder progression scenario).
I think it's quite likely that each faction will have a subtly different ending.
For Horde, it will the Horde team, with the help of the Alliance, who defeat Garrosh and then execute him.
For Alliance, the Alliance team will defeat, but not kill Garrosh, instead opting to hand him over to the new Horde leadership to dispense punishment.
Horde, but Ally should get it in the end.
This will keep the conflict between the two up and running.
I could accept that even as Alliance since his father stood up for Alliance-Horde cooperation when Garrosh had just started as a warchief. The other leaders of the Horde didn't really stand against him, they stood with him. Even Vol'jin stood with him and barely had some quarrel with him at start of Cataclysm but he still didn't raise a finger against Garrosh until Garrosh tried to kill him.
Cairne stood against Garrosh because he thought Garrosh killed the 5 tauren and 6 night elves just to interrupt the peace process and cover his tracks.
You can't compare the game right now with what it was in Crusade. It has far more advanced story-telling now. Not with much quality, and still lots and lots of cheesy exposition, but more advanced nontheless.
They can make him neutral, but that doesn't mean they can't make him more partial to the Alliance. And again, don't put too much into comparisons with Crusade. The story-telling during that period of time for the game was not as good as it is now, neither as involved with the gameplay. And considering that Horde have been the protagonists in two expansions in a row, it should be time for some Alliance love. If the fans insist on it, I can't see how Metzen and Co. can say otherwise with a straight face, especially considering how well it would tie in with the theme of the Legion.
Personaly I think the Horde deserves this way more but I'm certain I'm being at least a little biased.
The bigger issue for me though is: No matter who lands the killing blow, how do we get the Alliance out of Orgrimmar again?
Though I respect people trying to find reason for the Alliance to claim the killing blow, you all know that 'Blizzorde' will give the majority of the focus to the Horde.
On a personal level, I believe both have right to want to murder Garrosh. Either way, we should do it with Gorehowl. That'd really grind his gears.
I hope Wrathion swoops in Kills Garrosh and becomes new warchief, just to add one hell of a twist.
I can't wait to buy my "Garrosh did nothing wrong" t-shirt.
Paladin Bash has spoken.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
Horde.
It is Thrall's duty to land the killing blow having been the one to give Garrosh his power.
And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him.
Revelation 6:8
Neither side 'deserves' it more. Both sides have multiple, compelling reasons for wanting to depose or eliminate him. Going beyond that, the various leaders involved here are still primarily after Garrosh for 'the greater good' of their own people (even if they do have personal reasons to oppose him as well); which means the specifics of who gets the final blow are really irrelevant.
The only side that 'deserves' anything in this conflict is Garrosh himself - and here's hoping he gets everything he deserves.