Recent Blue Posts
Hunter adjustments -- April 23
Crests in Season 4
Boosting payments.
MMO-Champion
I dont get why people are allowed to make a thread about a dead boss after world first. WHO cares REALLY for a boss kill thats not his own???
Recent Forum Posts
Thread: World 4th ra den
-
2013-04-21, 05:26 PM #81Deleted
-
2013-04-21, 05:26 PM #82Herald of the Titans
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Posts
- 2,887
So where is a kill video after 5 guilds killed it already? The guild who posts it will be my new favorite! Go go WF video kill post!
-
2013-04-21, 05:28 PM #83Mechagnome
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Location
- US
- Posts
- 554
So much buttmad in this thread. Grats to Sanitas, I can't wait to see the video of the fight.
-
2013-04-21, 05:48 PM #84DeletedI can be an insistent jerk sometimes! And Sanitas killing it so close to Paragon clearly shows that my "enlightened theories" about 10man Ra-den being that much harder than 25man were in fact false in their roots. I guess I could not believe that Paragon could suck that much after such a great start to the tier. But that small likelihood reigned in the end.
Originally Posted by Lorgok
You ruled the race this tier, that's all we know.
-
2013-04-21, 05:53 PM #85Deleted
This is so humiliating for Paragon, after they saying that the fight only required gear Sanitas pulled a kill with less gear and attempts.
-
2013-04-21, 05:55 PM #86Warchief
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Posts
- 2,140
Well we cant judge the effective gear accurately by that ilvl estimate of kill time. Ppl can change gear etc, gear weight (weps?) is also different, many other parameters..
-
2013-04-21, 05:58 PM #87The Lightbringer
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Posts
- 3,088
gratz you filthy alliance scum!
-
2013-04-21, 06:02 PM #88Grunt
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 13
All I know is that if a US guild had killed a boss a day before Paragon/Method but with more attempts and more gear, then all the fan boys on here would consider Paragon/Method to be the true first kill. (None worse than wowprogress, seeing who kills what and when and then making up new exotic scoring rules to suit them)
Grats Sanitas on true WF 10man
-
2013-04-21, 06:04 PM #89The Lightbringer
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Posts
- 3,088
wtf? Only idiots will make that assumption. First is first. Originally Posted by Videl
And when a US guild makes a WF I will congratulate them and will consider that the WF. With no exceptions whatsoever. Same goes for SEA or every other region of the world. It's sad that Asia has different rules now.Last edited by Hubbl3; 2013-04-21 at 06:06 PM.
-
2013-04-21, 06:05 PM #90Dreadlord
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Location
- Sweden
- Posts
- 925
Originally Posted by UcanDoSht
Pretty sure Blizzard and the community think Ra-den is optional.
-
2013-04-21, 06:05 PM #91Grunt
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 13
You're implying idiots don't post here? Originally Posted by Hubbl3
-
2013-04-21, 06:07 PM #92DeletedSanitas had 1 more ilvl.. ONE. That is for the whole raid group, but nonetheless it was still 1. You make it sound like Sanitas killed it with 8 ilvls less or something. And we dont really know the full story.. maybe Sanitas had more metas? Maybe Sanitas got better luck with optimized loot for their 10 people? Originally Posted by spyke
No one but them knows so instead of bashing Paragon who are clearly a very good guild and still got it first on 10 man regardless of semantics, maybe just take it evenly and congratulate both guilds for the accomplishment?
-
2013-04-21, 06:09 PM #93The Lightbringer
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Posts
- 3,088
I am saying that when someone says that Method got the WF on boss x because they are EU (they needed less tries, less iLevel, etc) while BL killed boss x before them with every definition of the word that person is to be ignored. Originally Posted by Videl
-
2013-04-21, 06:11 PM #94DeletedGearcheck or not, 4 of our raiders didn't have the dpsmeta for the kill. Originally Posted by Dumble
Sanitas had 1 more ilvl.. ONE. That is for the whole raid group, but nonetheless it was still 1. You make it sound like Sanitas killed it with 8 ilvls less or something. And we dont really know the full story.. maybe Sanitas had more metas? Maybe Sanitas got better luck with optimized loot for their 10 people?
No one but them knows so instead of bashing Paragon who are clearly a very good guild and still got it first on 10 man regardless of semantics, maybe just take it evenly and congratulate both guilds for the accomplishment?
-
2013-04-21, 06:11 PM #95DeletedYes that is all in order, but Sanitas was much much better than Paragon on the last boss of the tier. Paragon took 3 (THREE, 3x) times the amount of time than Sanitas did on Ra-den. Sanitas killed Twin Consorts 2 April, Paragon 17 Mar. That shows that Paragon played more, much more than Sanitas during the tier. Originally Posted by Dumble
Sanitas had 1 more ilvl.. ONE. That is for the whole raid group, but nonetheless it was still 1. You make it sound like Sanitas killed it with 8 ilvls less or something. And we dont really know the full story.. maybe Sanitas had more metas? Maybe Sanitas got better luck with optimized loot for their 10 people?
No one but them knows so instead of bashing Paragon who are clearly a very good guild and still got it first on 10 man regardless of semantics, maybe just take it evenly and congratulate both guilds for the accomplishment?
But when skill and discussion mattered more than time, Sanitas pulled ahead. In that sense I am glad such a boss was added.
-
2013-04-21, 06:24 PM #96DeletedCorrection Sanitas had 1 less ilvl and like it or not 1ilvl at this point makes a huge difference on a gear check fight. Originally Posted by Dumble
Sanitas had 1 more ilvl.. ONE. That is for the whole raid group, but nonetheless it was still 1. You make it sound like Sanitas killed it with 8 ilvls less or something. And we dont really know the full story.. maybe Sanitas had more metas? Maybe Sanitas got better luck with optimized loot for their 10 people?
No one but them knows so instead of bashing Paragon who are clearly a very good guild and still got it first on 10 man regardless of semantics, maybe just take it evenly and congratulate both guilds for the accomplishment?
-
2013-04-21, 06:27 PM #97DeletedRa-den is as optional as Algalon and Sinestra was. Originally Posted by BergErr
Pretty sure Blizzard and the community think Ra-den is optional.Last edited by mmoc59b5827c7e; 2013-04-21 at 06:30 PM.
-
2013-04-21, 06:28 PM #98Deletedorly? You sure about that? Originally Posted by UcanDoSht
-
2013-04-21, 06:30 PM #99Over 9000!
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 9,695
I'm pretty sure they are portuguese too. Originally Posted by Migas11
-
2013-04-21, 06:31 PM #100Deleted
Paragon won the 12/12 race over sanitas, sanitas won the ra-den race, i would say paragon is the better guild in this tier. But it's always fun to see new guilds in the top, and how they can perform the upcoming tiers to see if they got lucky or if they truly are a top tier guild.
