1% per pet battle at 87 is this faster than questing?
1% per pet battle at 87 is this faster than questing?
sounds like a waste of time
I would go for qeusting, It gives you gold and gear to. (and reputation).
You get the same reward as completing a quest for each pet battle which in my experience is less than 1%, pet battles can be fun but they are not a quick way to level.
That would be 100 pet battle god sounds like some kinda nightmare to me,where the original lavender town music plays in the back ground and a multi headed badger mocks me from the corner
Best alternative to questing I guess - perhaps on par with dungeon grind.
Sad but true when they already have invented something amazing like scenarios
BUT WcII OST is awesome!
let's assume the average player takes about 2-3 hrs played at that level.
If 1 battle = 1%, then 1 level = 100 battles.
Lets also assume it takes about 3 mins per battle and some time in between to the next battle (1min). 100 x 4mins = 400 mins ---> 400mins / 60 = 6.67 hrs to level up
NOT worth it. However it DID use to be better than anything else for leveling http://youtu.be/k_-3KnZsO50?t=1m47s
I don't understand why they haven't tried converting older dungeons into scenarios or simply adding new ones to help leveling. Also the non-heroic 90 scenarios should be available at 85.
Originally Posted by High Overlord Saurfangi7-6700 @2.8GHz | Nvidia GTX 960M | 16GB DDR4-2400MHz | 1 TB Toshiba SSD| Dell XPS 15
Very good alternative imho
Slaying 8bit dragons with 6 pixel long swords since 1987.
It's not as efficient as questing smartly, but it definitely beats out dungeons and battlegrounds(lol). This is only true for the last couple of MoP levels btw, at all other levels pet battles are very inefficient to do.