Page 40 of 41 FirstFirst ...
30
38
39
40
41
LastLast
  1. #781
    Quote Originally Posted by UcanDoSht View Post
    No, they never obviously *lie* to their customers. Its a, now, confirmed fake and you can forget about it.
    I mean the screenshot itself is fake (the icons and new class) but they could still be working on 4th specs NOT represented by that screenshot.

  2. #782
    Quote Originally Posted by UcanDoSht View Post
    No, they never obviously *lie* to their customers. Its a, now, confirmed fake and you can forget about it.
    Cause blizzards never lied to us before right? Or taken something back? Oh man I could lose count how many times they've done this.

  3. #783
    You guys know ghostcrawler just comfirmed this to be fake right? The thread can end now.

    Quote Originally Posted by Simulatio View Post
    A handful of people nut-busting about it on various forums does not equal popularity, and popularity does not equal good design.

  4. #784
    lolz some of you guys just dont remember when they APRIL FOOLED us with pandas and SAID THAT WOULD NEVER BE IN GAME.. see where that went

  5. #785
    Quote Originally Posted by Angarin View Post
    Cause blizzards never lied to us before right? Or taken something back? Oh man I could lose count how many times they've done this.
    If Ghostcrawler was lying about this, I would lose all respect for him. Look bro, he said it on his personal twitter. If the fraudster who made the SS had nailed everything on the screenshot, GC wouldn't have said a goddamned thing about it, ever.

    Blizzard has NEVER lied to us. This would not be a "take back" ("take backs" presumably include player housing and things that we were told that were later cancelled). Either the graphic is fake, or it isn't. Ghostcrawler took time out of his day to tell you IT IS FUCKING FAKE. He has zero motivation to lie (for that matter, Blizzard has zero motivation to lie).


    The thing is a fake. Period.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by mileskg21 View Post
    lolz some of you guys just dont remember when they APRIL FOOLED us with pandas and SAID THAT WOULD NEVER BE IN GAME.. see where that went
    They never said Pandas wouldn't be in game. The april fools was so popular they put it into WCIII. Up until that point, there was no plan for a Brewmaster, but once the community was thrilled about it, boom, they started working on it. Get your shit straight!

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Sukhoi View Post
    You guys know ghostcrawler just comfirmed this to be fake right? The thread can end now.
    IMO the OP should fucking fix his post (or maybe a mod should) so that is the first thing anyone sees. He should link to:


    https://twitter.com/Ghostcrawler/sta...51530633428993


    "The screenshot with four class specs and a tinker class is fake. We can't confirm/deny every rumor but this one is just a clever fake."
    Last edited by Verain; 2013-08-12 at 01:36 AM.

  6. #786
    High Overlord Mshadowz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    The Frozen North
    Posts
    144
    He's lying! I can see it in his eyes!

  7. #787
    Stood in the Fire gguga12's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    On Brazil
    Posts
    469
    Guys Gc confirmed is fake lets stop this tread and be happy

  8. #788
    Pandaren Monk Desareon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    The Twisting Nether
    Posts
    1,883
    Blood Mage?!?!?!?! OH PLEASE GODS, PLEASE!!!!! But with no other evidence, I'm not holding my breath.

  9. #789
    Quote Originally Posted by Desareon View Post
    Blood Mage?!?!?!?! OH PLEASE GODS, PLEASE!!!!! But with no other evidence, I'm not holding my breath.
    See, this guy sees the top post, but doesn't see the tweet where GC has explicitly disavowed this screen shot. Because the GC tweet needs to be IN the top post, to stop people from being confused.

  10. #790
    Quote Originally Posted by UcanDoSht View Post
    No, they never obviously *lie* to their customers. Its a, now, confirmed fake and you can forget about it.
    Just because something is fake doesn't mean they aren't possibly working on something similar. Technically they wouldn't be lying even if that were the case. I'm not saying they are, but you are excluding possible outcomes that shouldn't be excluded yet.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Verain View Post
    Blizzard has NEVER lied to us.
    Ehm, I find that hard to believe.

  11. #791
    Quote Originally Posted by Hardstyler01 View Post
    Ehm, I find that hard to believe.
    Pay attention then.

    Now, lets clarify. A broken promise isn't a lie. A lie is when they know the truth and say something false. So, for instance, when they told us they were going to have player housing, they meant it... at the time. Later, they backed out, and didn't bother to tell anyone when that was happening. This is very standard among MMOs. But when, for instance, Lich King leaked, they didn't stand up and say "Nope, not Lich King". They never lied.

    And this isn't a lie either.



    Just because something is fake doesn't mean they aren't possibly working on something similar.
    If either tinker or 4th spec was being worked on right now, GC would NEVER have made any comment. He's not trying to fuck with us, ok? Blizzcon won't have an Engineer and a smirking GC saying "But technically, it was fake, because we didn't do the fourth spec! And we called our tinker an engineer!"


    It means that the next expac will not have a tinker.

    It means that the next expac will not have 4th spec.

    But much more importantly- it means that we have GC's word that this obvious fake is an obvious fake. If your response to that is "oh, ok, GC probably hopped onto twitter on Sunday to fucking lie to us", or "well, ok, the fake is fake, but everything in it might be true"...

    Well, whatever. Can't help ya!

  12. #792
    Quote Originally Posted by Hardstyler01 View Post
    Just because something is fake doesn't mean they aren't possibly working on something similar. Technically they wouldn't be lying even if that were the case. I'm not saying they are, but you are excluding possible outcomes that shouldn't be excluded yet.
    Exactly. If Blizzard is only working on 4th specs, they have to disavow this image now to avoid the predictable and constant "well what happened to the tinker?" questions after. Or vice versa.

  13. #793
    Quote Originally Posted by Verain View Post
    Pay attention then.

    Now, lets clarify. A broken promise isn't a lie. A lie is when they know the truth and say something false. So, for instance, when they told us they were going to have player housing, they meant it... at the time. Later, they backed out, and didn't bother to tell anyone when that was happening. This is very standard among MMOs. But when, for instance, Lich King leaked, they didn't stand up and say "Nope, not Lich King". They never lied.

    And this isn't a lie either.





    If either tinker or 4th spec was being worked on right now, GC would NEVER have made any comment. He's not trying to fuck with us, ok? Blizzcon won't have an Engineer and a smirking GC saying "But technically, it was fake, because we didn't do the fourth spec! And we called our tinker an engineer!"


    It means that the next expac will not have a tinker.

    It means that the next expac will not have 4th spec.
    When the Goblin and Worgen masks were leaked pre-Cata announcement, Blizzard tried to cover it up by saying people were just jumping to conclusions and it wasn't anything, and then they tried to add in several other NPC race masks to try and make it seem like the worgen/goblin ones weren't for new player races.

  14. #794
    Quote Originally Posted by Hitei View Post
    When the Goblin and Worgen masks were leaked pre-Cata announcement, Blizzard tried to cover it up by saying people were just jumping to conclusions and it wasn't anything, and then they tried to add in several other NPC race masks to try and make it seem like the worgen/goblin ones weren't for new player races.
    That is a pretty great example. I remember those days.

  15. #795
    Quote Originally Posted by Hitei View Post
    When the Goblin and Worgen masks were leaked pre-Cata announcement, Blizzard tried to cover it up by saying people were just jumping to conclusions and it wasn't anything, and then they tried to add in several other NPC race masks to try and make it seem like the worgen/goblin ones weren't for new player races.
    Didn't that all happen like, a year or more before cata was even announced? I seem to recall ogre and naga masks cropping up at about the same time, even vrykul.

  16. #796
    each class should have 6 specs, none of that new talent system shit, mages would learn 6 elements, warlocks would harness all of the dark magic universe, priests would study different disciplines, etc. The catch would be that every race would have its own 3 specs out of the 6, and the specs it would have would match their race. This would add much more depth to both the races and the classes.

  17. #797
    Quote Originally Posted by angryplateguy View Post
    Didn't that all happen like, a year or more before cata was even announced? I seem to recall ogre and naga masks cropping up at about the same time, even vrykul.
    It was quite a ways before Cata was announced at Blizzcon, yes.

    The Ogre, Naga and Vrykul were part of the fake masks that blizzard put into the PTR build afterwards to try and make it seem like the Goblin and Worgen masks weren't for players.

  18. #798
    Quote Originally Posted by Barrano247 View Post
    each class should have 6 specs, none of that new talent system shit, mages would learn 6 elements, warlocks would harness all of the dark magic universe, priests would study different disciplines, etc. The catch would be that every race would have its own 3 specs out of the 6, and the specs it would have would match their race. This would add much more depth to both the races and the classes.
    And then everyone would only play the most optimal of all them combined. No sir, that would never work.

    It would be cool, but it couldn't be anything other than flavor spells if it was going to work. Like warhammer online, archmage vs goblin shaman, or black orc and sword master. They tried that, but one side always ended up with the better end of the stick. Most notorious was brightwizard vs Sorceror, BWs were pretty much the best class in that game.

    So again, it wouldn't work.

  19. #799
    Quote Originally Posted by Tirr View Post
    Some guy on the US forums (Not me) apparently got emailed by "accident" a leaked image referring to class set up for next expansion. Pretty sure its BS but even if totally fake it still is interesting and if were true it would be awesome IMO.



    This is the thread that I saw it on, on US forums http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/to...6660776?page=1 Topic has now been deleted from us.battle.net

    Anyway I thought I'd bring this to mmo champion even if it is fake pretty cool ideas for 4th specs.

    ...this crap again

  20. #800
    Quote Originally Posted by Hitei View Post
    When the Goblin and Worgen masks were leaked pre-Cata announcement, Blizzard tried to cover it up by saying people were just jumping to conclusions and it wasn't anything, and then they tried to add in several other NPC race masks to try and make it seem like the worgen/goblin ones weren't for new player races.
    They added several other NPC race masks. They did not lie to us, however.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Iciya View Post
    Warrior = Dragonslayer ( Only thing I could think of) (DPS/TANK mix?)
    Quote Originally Posted by DeathbyFrostBomb73 View Post
    ...this crap again
    Did not see the GC tweet. Would benefit if the GC tweet was inserted via edit into the first post.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sukhoi View Post
    You guys know ghostcrawler just comfirmed this to be fake right? The thread can end now.
    Quote Originally Posted by gguga12 View Post
    Guys Gc confirmed is fake lets stop this tread and be happy
    Saw the GC tweet. Would benefit if the GC tweet was inserted via edit into the first post.






    Quote Originally Posted by Venyria View Post
    I mean the screenshot itself is fake (the icons and new class) but they could still be working on 4th specs NOT represented by that screenshot.
    This would be dissembling and misdirection. I get that you want a 4th spec, but lets be real here- if this was anywhere close to the truth, GC wouldn't have touched it at fucking all. No one made him respond or anything.


    Quote Originally Posted by Futhark View Post
    Exactly. If Blizzard is only working on 4th specs, they have to disavow this image now to avoid the predictable and constant "well what happened to the tinker?" questions after. Or vice versa.
    No, "they" don't. This is GC, on his weekend, tweeting. If there was a 4th spec, or a tinker, he wouldn't have even bothered with yet another rumor. But this dumb image keeps popping up, so I'm THRILLED he fucking said it was fake.

    Again, if your response is "Aw, he probably is just trying to hide the true parts with some Jedi mind trick"... again, no help for you, I got nothing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •