Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst
1
2
3
4
... LastLast
  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Darsithis View Post
    Terrible show? Have you read the Game of Thrones books, which came out long before WoW even existed?
    I said the show is terrible, not the book

  2. #22
    A Song of Ice and Fire: A Game of Thrones was published in like 1997, not 2000. Also, its almost assuredly no accident that the title exists as-is because WoW is filled with tons of ASoIaF references and people have been reading and rereading these books for almost 20 years now. The idea that there was no one on the WoW staff who read ASoIaF and "Kingslayer" as a title is just happy coincidence is pretty ludicrous considering almost anyone who was in to fantasy literature read Martin's stuff.

  3. #23
    Mechagnome SkyBlueAri's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Second star on the right.
    Posts
    617
    Haha this is one of the worst threads I have seen in a while, ty for the laugh OP.

    Its definitely not an easter egg in either shows. The titles just make sense in both cases.

    I think the essential difference between GoT and WoW in using the title is that in GoT it is not a desirable one. Simply put: anyone who uses it uses it with dishonour and a moral disgust. Jamie does not like having it (although it has a nice ring to it).
    In WoW the title is one of triumph and completing an incredibly difficult task. It is a desired title and one that people like to have on themselves.
    "There is a savage beast in every man, and when you hand that man a sword or spear and send him forth to war, the beast stirs." - George R.R. Martin, A Storm of Swords

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by Tekkommo View Post
    So much wrong here, WotLK is the 2nd worst part of wow, only beaten by Cataclysm.

    Game of Thrones is a great show.
    I heard opinions. Not a huge fan of GoT either.

    But yeah, they're probably not related.

  5. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Zaelsino View Post
    Seems like a pretty intentional homage to me, to the books at least. WoW has quite a lot of ASoIaF references, including other titles (Storm's End).
    The books were non-existant in terms of popularity at that time. If the TV series hadn't happened, those books would've faded off to obscurity.

    This is one of those "Sometimes in life, a Cigar is just a Cigar" moments.

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Birkhoff View Post
    I said the show is terrible, not the book
    The show is also pretty awesome.

    Remember, the Book doesn't have screen time. It isn't limited to fitting in enough story in a series or 1 hour TV slot. I've not read the books, but I'm loving the T.V. show and it is just amazing. Having read a few spoilers, and comparisons, I can see why the story doesn't seem as good as the Books, but they've got to do a lot more in a shorter amount of time, while also keeping certain stories alive and exciting.

  7. #27
    Scarab Lord Auxis's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    4,937
    On a side note, go to BattleNet and type in the name Jaime. I can GUARANTEE that most of the warriors with that name will have the title on.
    By Blizzard Entertainment:
    Part of the reason is that Battlegrounds are like ducks.
    My Nintendo FC is 2208-5726-4303.

  8. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Euthyphro View Post
    A Song of Ice and Fire: A Game of Thrones was published in like 1997, not 2000. Also, its almost assuredly no accident that the title exists as-is because WoW is filled with tons of ASoIaF references and people have been reading and rereading these books for almost 20 years now. The idea that there was no one on the WoW staff who read ASoIaF and "Kingslayer" as a title is just happy coincidence is pretty ludicrous considering almost anyone who was in to fantasy literature read Martin's stuff.
    ...you, sir, need to seriously get out of the bubble you trapped yourself within that you call a life if you believe what you just wrote there.

  9. #29
    Nope, just that "Regicide" doesn't sound as good.

  10. #30
    Elemental Lord
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    8,389
    Quote Originally Posted by Birkhoff View Post
    No because Game of Thrones is a terrible show
    So "terrible" that it ranks #2 on IMDB for the most highly rated television series of all time. But then again I see the word "terrible" used here so often that this shouldn't surprise me....

  11. #31
    I'm pretty sure that's no easter egg. But Arthas does look a lot like Jaime from the tv adaptation.

  12. #32
    You're living in a dreamland if you think those books were not widely known before the TV show. The dreamland being inhabited has you for a citizen if you think no one at Blizzard, a gaming company producing tons of fantasy-themed games, had not read ASoIaF.

    Quote Originally Posted by mvallas View Post
    The books were non-existant in terms of popularity at that time. If the TV series hadn't happened, those books would've faded off to obscurity.

    This is one of those "Sometimes in life, a Cigar is just a Cigar" moments.

  13. #33
    Deleted
    Correct me if im wrong, but if you slay a king, you are, a kingslayer? Not only in GoT Land.

  14. #34
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Raelbo View Post
    So "terrible" that it ranks #2 on IMDB for the most highly rated television series of all time. But then again I see the word "terrible" used here so often that this shouldn't surprise me....
    Just because IMDB rank it highly doesn't mean everyone will like it. Opinions are just that. Opinions.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rochana View Post
    Seems like an obvious homage to me ... along with a handful of other references.


    Because really, how often have you read the title "kingslayer" in any other fantasy genres? It takes a bit of coincidences for the titles to be exactly the same, since more common terms for someone who killed a king are "regicidal murderer", "betrayer", "assassin" etc... Kingslayer is a pretty specific linguistic concoction...
    While this is true, many forget that outside of literature, the term regicide is pretty rare. Sure they could have used it, but then half the player base probably wouldn't know what the word or title even meant. Kingslayer however is basic and does exactly what it says on the tin.

  15. #35
    Quote Originally Posted by Hyve View Post
    The show is also pretty awesome.

    Remember, the Book doesn't have screen time. It isn't limited to fitting in enough story in a series or 1 hour TV slot. I've not read the books, but I'm loving the T.V. show and it is just amazing. Having read a few spoilers, and comparisons, I can see why the story doesn't seem as good as the Books, but they've got to do a lot more in a shorter amount of time, while also keeping certain stories alive and exciting.
    yet they waste their short time with midget porn and incest

  16. #36
    Doubt it. I do recall an event boss in Rift that said "in life I was called kingslayer" which I think may have been (or else it was a jab at Wrath).

    Interesting observation though.

  17. #37
    Quote Originally Posted by Raelbo View Post
    So "terrible" that it ranks #2 on IMDB for the most highly rated television series of all time. But then again I see the word "terrible" used here so often that this shouldn't surprise me....
    Have you ever heard of the "overrated" and "overhyped" terms? Breaking Bad has the same score as Game of Thrones yet it is a much better show. I almost slept during season 1 of GoT

  18. #38
    I don't see why it wouldn't be when it's no secret that a very large portion of the game involves references to various other games/movies/novels and the like. Excessively so at times!

  19. #39
    Quote Originally Posted by Birkhoff View Post
    yet they waste their short time with midget porn and incest
    You know the incest is a fairly important part of the plot, right?

  20. #40
    Quote Originally Posted by Birkhoff View Post
    yet they waste their short time with midget porn and incest
    Because it creates a lot of tension, and is vital to the story line. I agree, a few scenes feel silly at times, but later in the series, it can be quite important, or it is just a nice smirk and a smile.

    Like, what the fuck did Podrick do to those whores?!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •