I think it should start 25 levels lower than the current level cap, just like DKs did in Wrath. So, I would've voted for 70 if it were a choice. Went for 75 since it wasn't.
1
55
65
75
85
90
You're not allowed to discuss conspiracy theories on mmo-champion, which makes me wonder what they're trying to hide.
I think Blizzard found the right idea. Make a hero class "overpowered" early on, but balanced by the time you reach level cap. I haven't played a new DK in years, but the last time I did, even after they were balanced in end game, they definitely felt much more powerful at 60 then other classes. It gave it a nice "hero class" kick but in a way that was pretty inconsequential overall.
That is not dead which can eternal lie.
And with strange aeons even death may die.
if it is demon hunter, probably 55 like the deathknight, starting area should be defirent depending on race. Nightelfs should start in a phased fellwood, humans in blasted lands, bloodelf Quel'danas (could be great imo, but probably a bad idea, since.. well, dunno for most of the other races.)
but demon hunters should probably play through outland although i would like an higher start level aswell to not have to go though all the pain of outland/northrend/cata content.
I think Demon Hunters should start at 55, just like Death Knights. They can start on a large floating island off the cost of Outland. Level to 58 and then get sent to Hellfire. in-fact that Warlock island that was datamind months ago could be used for such a thing. Blizzard revives Illidan, he goes to the island to recover and then starts training a new age of Demon Hunters. They could use old Lore and say this island is Deathwing's Lair on Draenor. The one form the second war.
I fixed that for you .
Last edited by Solzan Nemesis; 2013-07-30 at 09:10 PM.
I can't find where they admitted that, only the opposite:
"We didn't make DKs intentionally OP. While we want people to purchase Wrath of the Lich King, there are lot of logical flaws with making one class purposely overpowered (such as angering all the players who play the other nine classes)."
Well, I was basing it on a 5-level intro zone. So if you start at 70, you leave the zone at 75 and go to ... um, Grizzly Hills? Sholazar Basin?
With 80, though, you are done at 85 and go straight to Pandaria, which is why I should've included 80 in the poll, and may redo the poll with better explanation tomorrow.
You're not allowed to discuss conspiracy theories on mmo-champion, which makes me wonder what they're trying to hide.
If they do it again I hope it's 75 and leaves it's starting zone at 78. I hate Northrend so much.
Not any of those levels make any sense.
DK's came with Northrend which was 68-80.
The one before that was Outland which was 58-70.
DK's started at 55 and leveled 3 lvls to 58 and then entered Outland.
Assuming there will be a Hero Class in the next Exp and assuming the next Exp is 90-95, then it should be something like this...
Hero Class comes with an Exp that is 90-95.
The one before that is Pandaria which is 85-90.
The Hero Class should then start at 82. Anything more than one continent is way too much and anything less is making it hard to learn your class.
Starting at 65? That's fucking absurd IMO.