Originally Posted by
KrazyK923
Actually, no, its not logical to assume me not wanting Orgrimmar destroyed means I want something...further? How is that logical? Its pretty simple, I want the Alliance to actually be proactive. I've seen other people making this argument too, "Tell me exactly what you want." All I want is the Alliance to actually matter and not be drug along in its story. I want to see us doing stuff and the consequences of those actions and not just be told "Oh, its ok though, your gameplay may suck, but you win in the end, so its all good, right?" If you want a specific example, I gave one about what 5.3 should have been for us on the last page:
Which is why I don't generally mention 5.1 or 5.2 outside of the context of Dalaran somehow being an Alliance win. They were fine. Both factions had their own shit they were doing.
As for what Dave Kosak said, maybe him saying, again, that we need to just "wait and see" for the Alliance to get something nice works for you. But I've given up any hope of them actually doing so since they've said several times now to "wait and see" where ultimately nothing happens. Maybe you can't understand it if you're solely Horde, but eventually you stop believing the claim of "No, srsly gaiz, just wait, it gets better!" after they've said it a few times with no result.