Originally Posted by
zenga
Once again your logic is flawed. There will always be a best, second best and worst. Right now there is a best healer and a worst healer, but most healing specs are competitive. Point being, it's not because a spec is #1 that it's OP by default. I don't mind warriors being the best class in the game, I don't mind mages the best caster in the game. As long as they are not OP as fuck and I stand a chance.
The point is not that warriors are the best, the point is that they are miles ahead.
People have explained several times in this thread that the warriors at blizzcon were both a destruction lock who rerolled warrior (tughonomics) and a shadow priest (zuniyakin) 1 month prior to the tournament. Both of them are the absolute top in their main specs, and qualified with those specs (destro and spriest) during the previous pvp season. They realized that their main specs are no longer competitive at that level and started playing warrior, as they figured that that is their best bet.
Keep in mind that they made that choice with 105k dollar on the line. There is no way in the world that both players could perform at the same level on a spec they just started playing like they can on their main specs that they have been playing for years. Not at that level. The fact that they both chose to reroll warrior, shows how OP the spec really is. And the consensus among everyone who watched that tournament is that those asian teams were just not on par with most european/us top teams (its like letting a 2,2k warrior team play against a 2.7k other team, the 2.7k team wins and then use that as proof to judge warriors, while the player level difference is maybe tenfold).
Yet you keep using that to show your warrior argument, while the context is totally different.