Yes and no. Girls who run risk of having their clitoris removed because they are born in an Islamic nation are clearly worse off, it's not comparable. But since in civilized countries female circumcision is unlawful and male circumsion 'a tradition', men have a much higher chance in those countries of being mutilated without any medical reason, so no in that case men are not better off.
So we should outlaw cleft (beyond cleft palate) surgery and braces because kids can't consent? Kid gets in a car accident, sorry buddy no plastic surgery for you until your 18! Coming down the birth canal gave you a funny shaped head? Sorry we aren't allowed to correct it until you're cone head has fused together because parents aren't allowed to request cosmetic surgery done to their children.
Well I don't give a shit tbh, my girlfriend use stylage M so it's not like I can call it wrong... I do call it capital destruction though lol. I got a friend who is cut and he's happy for it... my point was more that there plenty people out there whom are circumcised that will toss abuse towards people who modify their bodies in other ways though. I like people who are consistent in their beliefs, I don't like hypocritical folks. ;P
The nerve is called the "nerve of awareness". You cant dissect it. Its a current that runs up the center of your spine. I dont know if any of you have sat down, crossed your legs, smoked DMT, and watch what happens... but what happens to me is this big thing goes RRRRRRRRRAAAAAWWW! up my spine and flashes in my brain... well apparently thats whats going to happen if I do this stuff...
Cecal appendix says hi. Foreskin might as well be a remnant of evolution, something we really don't need anymore. Obviously there is risk of infection and malpractice in the process, but the operation does have health benefits.
And when it comes to sex and all the talk that you lose feeling etc, is bullshit. I was cut at adulthood, so I've copulated with and without a hood and I prefer cut.
Female circumcision on the other hand is just plain brutality and serves no purpose.
The title of the thread alone makes me wonder about the level of ignorance of female anatomy.
Yes because making an internal organ external is for sure the right thing to do.
All forms of female genital modification for cosmetical/religious purposes on infants are banned without medical necessarity.
But one form of infant male genital modification is lawfull.
Who is ignorant?
I fully agree and am so thankfull I'm not under a state where they go "We think thats bad so we will just BAN that shit" and instead they do studies and reaserch before jumping on a bandwagon and passing laws!
http://www.cps.ca/en/documents/position/circumcision
Youtube Chan : http://www.youtube.com/user/eqbobyboucher
Armory : http://us.battle.net/wow/en/characte...Odina/advanced
I have nothing against ppl who opt for it, I just think doing something like that to a child that doesn't have any concepts at all let alone the ability to say no is the bit thats wrong. its the same with belief in general i'm completely open minded and would never question anyone's choice to follow a belief system but this comes across as forcing something on someone who doesn't know any better.
Last edited by Heathy; 2013-12-12 at 11:05 PM.
Here's the difference between you an I. I had thousands of pleasure receptors cut off my dick when I was an infant. You didn't have anything done to your vagina. Many women go through issues of not being able to orgasm through vaginal intercourse. That's why you have a clitoris, and why it's illegal to chop it off. However, similarly, you have no compassion for men who had an operation done that literally does that to a man. But it's "ok, because he can still get off". Well, some women can still get off without a clitoris, it just may be more difficult. But if it's more difficult for a guy to get off it's ok, right? This is the double standard presented by you. Maybe when you start to have compassion for men, instead of your feminazi agenda i will show compassion towards you.
This is precisely why I'm for free will on this subject. A person should be allowed to mature to an age where they can decide their own happiness, provided they consider the long-term effects. (You know how a person gets a tattoo on the fly, and then regrets it later. Sort of like that, where they should have put more consideration into their personal reasoning.)
I've seen arguments in every direction on this issue since I started reading the thread. Some guys get plenty of pleasure sans foreskin, so good for them. I feel sorry for the ones who suffer the opposite (no pleasure sans foreskin). I have also known of people who have sexual issues WITH foreskin, and had to have theirs removed.
I honestly think that circumcision for anyone should be the decision of the person who would receive the procedure (unless there is a medical history that actually deems is necessary, like the one person with the family history of UTI that came from having a foreskin).
I also honestly think that people who want to have it done to their children based on their own aesthetic opinion or sense of tradition should wait and let their offspring decide on their own.
And based on my own experiences with both ends of the gender spectrum, I am even more for free will. (I just wish testicle sacks looked more attractive and less like a growth.) The penis is too fascinating of an body part for people to go chopping it up before it has a chance to reach its potential. (I had an ex whose penis actually looked like it was stunted because of circumcision, as if too much was trimming off, but he had no sexual issues otherwise.)