Maybe O=)
But that being said my bf's is circumcised, and it's the only one I've ever known. So I guess.
I'd try and pitch it as an experiment for science, but really, no one would fall for it.
Touche'd into oblivion. Defetated I lay.
OT: If it reduces sexual pleasure. How can we even prove that. Is there...some sexual pleasure monitor or something?
#TeamLegion #UnderEarthofAzerothexpansion plz #Arathor4Alliance #TeamNoBlueHorde
Warrior-Magi
i find it pretty disgusting that parents still get their children circumsised for no reason, if it needs to be done for a medical reason, or an adult wants it done on their own, thats fine. but doing it to a child for no reason other than "my parents did it to me" is disgusting. im glad here the only people that get it done are religious families, and its not widespread.
I find that assertion to be the funniest. I'd like to see this scientific measuring device for pleasure and how it equates that pleasure directly with the presence of a foreskin and not any number of other numerous factors that go into sexual pleasure for males.
It's like earring holes. Nobody ask girls if they want them.
My understanding that it's not so much "pleasure" in an intensity (though this may occur, since the head is left unprotected), as it is sensation. The foreskin provides a decent sensation against the shaft, which in combination with the friction of sliding against the inside of something (or a hand) is entirely different than when you're cut.
You have two different actions of motion operating on your penis since the foreskin itself does have give, even when erect.
So while it may not be a direct link to lack of sensitivity (since this is arguable), it does remove different sensations you can experience.
To think I missed out on the glory of docking all these years because I am a Jew, Muslim or American. LOL
"If you want to control people, if you want to feed them a pack of lies and dominate them, keep them ignorant. For me, literacy means freedom." - LaVar Burton.
It's the same line of thinking when a man suggests that a woman get breast implants.Makes your junk look better
Both are wrong. Please don't do this, people. That goes for both sides. Uncut men shouldn't have to feel pressured to become circumcised later in life because girls think his junk looks ugly, and girls shouldn't feel pressured to get breast implants for the same reason. Anyone who reinforces either of these superficial mentalities are part of the problem. =/
OP should probably look up what female circumcision really means. Once males get the entire top of their penis cut off so they're incapable of enjoying sex anymore, we'll compare. Female circumcision means the clitoris gets removed, usually without sedatives. The trimming of the lips is something else entirely and done mostly in the porn industry.
That said, I'm 100% against male circumcision for underaged, either. Not to mention it looks disgusting.
Its more the fact that only one side is doing it.
One side goes: "WELL IT LOOKS PRETTIER!"
While the other does not. The other side does not address it. The other side says: That is subjective - and completely fucking irrelevant to the discussion.
- - - Updated - - -
Oh god... i got cola all over my keyboard...
They determine pleasure by the number of receptors in a penis
Makes sense.
Are some of them damaged since the head is always exposed then? That's one thing that seems odd. Apparently the head of the penis is never supposed to get as dry as it does when you're circumcised. I imagine that isn't very good for... receptors. Or the war against zippers.