Again for the 900th time. The foreskin is retractable, and when erect and retracted takes up almost 0 real-estate.
There's almost no aesthetic difference between cut and uncut when erect.
The only difference is an uncut guy can't have a semi-circ or residual scarring from the procedure.
So unless the woman in question likes staring at and rating *un-erect johnsons, or has a surgical scar fetish, the aesthetic argument is a crock of shit.
Last edited by Gheld; 2014-01-24 at 04:43 PM. Reason: *oops, meant un-erect not uncut
About fucking time.
This barbarism has gone on for too long.
I simply wish the rest of the ''civilised'' world does the same.
Who are we to judge? Rational humans, I think. Do we need to be something more?
I know that, she knows that. It doesn't change the fact that we're married and she sees my unerect dick on a daily basis, hence her mentioning she's glad it's cut, because she thinks they look awful when unerect and uncut. I don't know why you're making big deal about this, like people don't know.
Rudimentary creatures of blood and flesh. You touch my mind, fumbling in ignorance, incapable of understanding.
You exist because we allow it, and you will end because we demand it.
Sovereign
Mass Effect
Amazing all this bird watching yet we can't get a 90% in favor for marriage equality in the US. Bwahahahahaha
"If you want to control people, if you want to feed them a pack of lies and dominate them, keep them ignorant. For me, literacy means freedom." - LaVar Burton.
I think the foreskin/penis aspect is sort of missing the point. The issue is carrying out an operation which has a real risk of heavily impacting someone's quality of life, without medical reason, on someone unable to make an informed decision.