I think its to make the character more believable. How many full on macho women do you see in "real life" I don't agree with there needing to be an element of frailty but a dose of perspective within a character is needed. As to the too butch part it falls again (for me) into the first comment. Is it believable? if so then no problem. But most of the time when it gets to that extent its over done to try and prove a point which makes it far too obvious and detracts from the character.
My YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/KungKeno21?feature=mhee
My DeviantArt page: http://deathknightcommander.deviantart.com/
Talking about Scandinavia. I Once heard a story(this was not in the news BTW) when a guy and his girlfriend at a club and there was it asshole who was hitting on his girlfriend and try to molest her and he got into an argument with him the boyfriend who verbally owned him. then the asshole attacked him but got beaten. But the Boyfriend was caught and fine by the cops for defending his girlfriend.
Would be much more difficult than it seems. You would have to convince a large amount of the population (enough to make meaningful and influential protests) that both their government and religion (yes I said it), have problems that need fixing.
It's happening slowly (I think..hope), but I think it will be different than the movements the west had in the 20's and 60's.
She poisoned 14 people because she was stuck in a loveless marriage? Imagine if people did this in the west, who'd be left alive? Kids!
Yep, happens from time to time. Worst I've read about in that regard is some guy who broke into a couples apartment, the intruder tried to rape the wife and the husband defended her and beat him up. The husband was convicted of aggrevated assault and had to pay damages. The intruder was convicted of trespassing and harassment, they couldn't "prove that he had intended to rape the wife" so he got off on that.
http://www.thelocal.se/20140124/anti...religious-bias
It was found to be on valid grounds and not discrimination.When she told them that her faith prevented her from taking part in abortions, the hospital retracted its offer of summer employment, Ellinor Grimmark claimed in a complaint that has submitted to the Swedish discrimination watchdog Diskrimineringsombudsmannen (DO).
Well, I don't watch TV all that much really, so I'm not really in a position to answer your question directly, but I can answer it generally:
People want to watch shows with characters they can identify with. That much is really obvious, and you only have to look at how many lesbians in the US / UK who have watched "The L word". When you have a society where men in movies are shown as anything and everything that they desire to be, you have a huge array of role models to look up to, people to aspire to. Pick any treat that you find admirable (be it strength, intelligence, whatever) and you can find hundreds of male role models in the media to look up to. If you are a big tough guy who wants to watch big tough guys doing big tough guy things, you can find 100 shows about it. If you are a intelligent critical thinking kind of guy, you can find 100s of shows about men doing intelligent critical thinking kind of things. If you are a sensitive kind compassionate guy you can find 100's of examples of shows with these types of guys represented - And everything in between.
If you are a woman, and you want to watch a show with someone you can relate to as a main character, and you don't see yourself as a love interest for a man, or a damsel in distress, or generally inferior to your male counterparts, there are very very few examples of this and you are really limited in what you can watch.
The result of this is a society of people who grow up seeing men as capable of anything they want, and women as capable of little more than being a love interest and a damsel, and women growing up with very few people in the media that they can relate to and look up to.
Threat of violence and blackmailing is rape.
Being naive and stupid is not the society's or men's fault. You can say no. If you don't say no, you can blame yourself. Being easily agitated is not coercing.
That is the problem with modern western feminism. There is no reason for it to exist in the first place. Human nature is just the way it is, men and women are different.
Young women do stupid decisions regarding their sex life that they regret later on. Young men do stupid things in other kinds of things - like drinking alcohol, smoking, drugs, dangerous stuff such as climbing to dangerous places etc.
None of the problems men do are being blamed on women. Even if men do stupid things to look cool in front of women. It's not the society's fault, nor the women's fault. It's their own stupidity.
Then don't watch those TV shows.he result of this is a society of people who grow up seeing men as capable of anything they want, and women as capable of little more than being a love interest and a damsel, and women growing up with very few people in the media that they can relate to and look up to.
There are plenty of TV shows where women are main characters, with traits worthy of being followed.