1. #2201
    Quote Originally Posted by Slaskra View Post
    So were you arguing that the sex of the justices in the majority was relevant to the outcome of the case, or not?
    I'm not him but I find it a bit strange that 5 dudes (or whatever it is) are weighing in on acceptable female contraceptives.
    "You six-piece Chicken McNobody."
    Quote Originally Posted by RICH816 View Post
    You are a legend thats why.

  2. #2202
    Banned Orlong's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Class 1,000,000 Clean Room
    Posts
    13,127
    Quote Originally Posted by NYC17 View Post
    "Salt of the Earth women"...

    That's all.
    Yes. Salt of the earth. Normal everyday people who were brought up in a normal home and schools, rather than being brought up in an anything goes California metropolis and attending school at some neoliberal college to indoctrinate them as an activist

  3. #2203
    Quote Originally Posted by Tradewind View Post
    I'm not him but I find it a bit strange that 5 dudes (or whatever it is) are weighing in on acceptable female contraceptives.
    Especially while a few of those dudes are not shy about subscribing to doctrine that is against them.

  4. #2204
    Quote Originally Posted by Ebildays View Post
    Religious people should not be allowed to deny people something because it goes against their beliefs. I argue that denying something because it goes against your personal beliefs is in direct contradiction to God. That God gave man free will to make his own choices good or bad. The bad choices were not removed or taken away even in the Garden of Eden God allowed the Apple tree to stand. By allowing it to stand he allowed the choice for Adam and Even to eat from it, so even God knows that choice is a good thing. By demanding that we remove choice we are stating that we know better then the God that allowed us to have free will in the first place.

    Okay that is the end of my angry religious rant.
    This would be a more persuasive argument if "not purchasing for you" and "denying you access to" were rationally related concepts, but they really just are not. If the Greens were threatening to fire any employee that, on their own, was procuring the other forms of contraception, I don't think I would disagree at all, since that could at least be argued as coercive.

  5. #2205
    Quote Originally Posted by Orlong View Post
    Yes. Salt of the earth. Normal everyday people who were brought up in a normal home and schools, rather than being brought up in an anything goes California metropolis and attending school at some neoliberal college to indoctrinate them as an activist
    oh boy..."normal home" haha...

    Wasn't Arnie a Republican and huge anti-socialist?
    "You six-piece Chicken McNobody."
    Quote Originally Posted by RICH816 View Post
    You are a legend thats why.

  6. #2206
    Quote Originally Posted by Slaskra View Post
    So were you arguing that the sex of the justices in the majority was relevant to the outcome of the case, or not?
    The discussion taking place was that it was THE reason. I stated very clearly it was not a sole factor, but it's delusional for one to believe it is a NON-factor.

    Keep up please. I'm not usually in favor of having to explain and re-explain the discussion to people who have nothing to contribute, but wish to take part anyway.
    Last edited by NYC17; 2014-07-02 at 05:16 PM.

  7. #2207
    Banned Kellhound's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Bank of the Columbia
    Posts
    20,935
    Quote Originally Posted by Endus View Post
    Yes.

    That's exactly why this case was about a corporation's right to make religious choices that negatively affect its workforce, regardless of the faiths or lack thereof of those employees.

    Free exercise of religion means you should be able to choose, for yourself, on religious grounds. This is why adult Jehovah's Witnesses can make informed choices to refuse blood transfusions, even if doing so costs them their lives. That's their free exercise of religion. They are not free to make the same choice for their children, let alone anyone else. That isn't "free exercise", any more; that's inflicting your religion on another.

    And before anyone says this is an unfair comparison because blood transfusions are a bigger deal than 4 types of birth control; my issue is not the specifics of this case, it's the precedent that it sets and the rationale used to justify it.
    HL is not preventing any employee from using any contraceptive.

    People/Government/Corperations inflict religion/anti-religion on us all the time. People only moan and groan when they don't like a specific instance of it.

  8. #2208
    Old God Captain N's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New Resident of Emerald City
    Posts
    10,955
    Quote Originally Posted by Orlong View Post
    Yes. Salt of the earth. Normal everyday people who were brought up in a normal home and schools, rather than being brought up in an anything goes California metropolis and attending school at some neoliberal college to indoctrinate them as an activist
    So someone who was born with money and went to preppy New England Schools where they were taught that poor people are a blight and that the more stuff you have the better your are?

  9. #2209
    Quote Originally Posted by Orlong View Post
    Yes. Salt of the earth. Normal everyday people who were brought up in a normal home and schools, rather than being brought up in an anything goes California metropolis and attending school at some neoliberal college to indoctrinate them as an activist
    I'm just quoting this to point out that you have a habit of discrediting yourself. I wish I could say I contributed, but all I've really done is highlighted your words. All the heavy lifting was done by you.

    Bravo.

  10. #2210
    Quote Originally Posted by The Batman View Post
    Perhaps we should stop this war on welfare then.
    Why? Just because you aren't guaranteed a job doesn't mean you're guaranteed for me to support you. I'd figured out real quick how to become a better employee or go to some of those horrible Christian charities that actually exist to help people. Don't expect my ass to carry you

  11. #2211
    Quote Originally Posted by Interception View Post
    So someone who was born with money and went to preppy New England Schools where they were taught that poor people are a blight and that the more stuff you have the better your are?
    New England is highly urban and liberal. You may mean the developing states in the Southeast.
    Quote Originally Posted by Gambit5555 View Post
    Why? Just because you aren't guaranteed a job doesn't mean you're guaranteed for me to support you. I'd figured out real quick how to become a better employee or go to some of those horrible Christian charities that actually exist to help people. Don't expect my ass to carry you
    Yeah I sure called that "just die" comment didn't I?

  12. #2212
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by petej0 View Post
    I would just like to know how the family that owns Hobby Lobby is being denied the right to practice their religion by offering Plan B insurance coverage to their employees?
    They don't want to pay for abortions.

    Quote Originally Posted by Endus View Post
    That isn't "free exercise", any more; that's inflicting your religion on another.
    In the case of Hobby Lobby, no one is forced to work there.

  13. #2213
    Quote Originally Posted by Garian View Post
    They don't want to pay for abortions.
    They never were by multiple reasons. That's the point.
    Quote Originally Posted by Garian View Post
    In the case of Hobby Lobby, no one is forced to work there.
    They're not forced to do business here either.

    Nice valid point, isn't it?

  14. #2214
    Merely a Setback Adam Jensen's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sarif Industries, Detroit
    Posts
    29,063
    Quote Originally Posted by Garian View Post
    They don't want to pay for abortions.
    They aren't.

    Those contraceptives do not cause abortions.
    Putin khuliyo

  15. #2215
    Quote Originally Posted by NYC17 View Post
    but it's delusional for one to believe it is a NON-factor.
    On what grounds? To claim that it was a non-factor is to claim to have knowledge of the majority justice's thought process. The onus is on you to prove that it was a factor to whatever extent you believe it is - and "they are men" or "its human nature" are not arguments, but rather extremely broad dismissals of any given person's ability to think objectively.

    I'm not saying the bias did not exist. I find it hard to believe that even supreme court justices are infallible in their reasoning. What I am saying is that there is nothing to indicate that sex was an influencing factor in their decision.

  16. #2216
    Old God Captain N's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New Resident of Emerald City
    Posts
    10,955
    Quote Originally Posted by Rukentuts View Post
    New England is highly urban and liberal. You may mean the developing states in the Southeast.
    Now that's odd - Ive seen worse bias towards women in New York then Ive seen in Atlanta. Anecdotal obviously.

  17. #2217
    Quote Originally Posted by Garian View Post
    In the case of Hobby Lobby, no one is forced to work there.
    Force is a red herring argument. Force is not required for it to be an imposition.

  18. #2218
    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Jensen View Post
    They aren't.

    Those contraceptives do not cause abortions.
    They're also not paying for them. The insurance company pays the claim.
    Quote Originally Posted by Interception View Post
    Now that's odd - Ive seen worse bias towards women in New York then Ive seen in Atlanta. Anecdotal obviously.
    I'm just saying on a macro level.

    And Atlanta is actually decent for the South. It's like the 2nd or 3rd "gayest city".

  19. #2219
    Quote Originally Posted by Rukentuts View Post
    New England is highly urban and liberal.
    That attitude is pervasive across political groups.

    - - - Updated - - -

    So will we now see a mass boycott of Hobby Lobby and like companies?

  20. #2220
    Quote Originally Posted by Rukentuts View Post
    The point is, we should overlook sexism because someone else can give a band-aid.
    You are right, the sexism is horrible. Hobby Lobby covers 16 forms of birth control, and only two are for men. Those sexist bastards. They probably cover a maternity leave that is far longer then paternity leave too. I'm so tired of this sexism against men. The war on men must end

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •