"Council of Glades" trademark filled

[Deleted]

Man of whatever he's made of

Man of Large Orcish Bottoms.

[Deleted]

Then we could talk about The fall of the Lich King, The Rise of the Zandalari or The Rage of the Firelands.

Pretty sure none of those patches had the first The in their titles.

[Niwes]

i ask myself: what happened with the "eye of ashzara" trademark some years ago ? i never saw a confirmed fake info.

[Feali]

This. OP posted it saying he found it and he posted it in the correct board.... which says to me he wasn't just trying to be a shitposting retard like the rest of the "leakers" and posters have been. He actually posted this correctly.

Or he's just very clever and expects us to think exactly that. I'M ON TO YOU COMFORT PRO! He also has only one post.

[Deleted]

Pretty sure none of those patches had the first The in their titles.

Weeell, the line "Behold the rage of the Firelands!" does appear in-game.

[Soulwind]

Pretty sure none of those patches had the first The in their titles.

But they were events in lore, so according to you, they should be referenced as such.

[Deleted]

Anyway I am really bored of debating grammar. This is the title we're getting if it's real, and it makes grammatical sense. At the very least it makes sense with some poetic license.

[FenixAU]

Or he's just very clever and expects us to think exactly that. I'M ON TO YOU COMFORT PRO! He also has only one post.

YEAH! There's never been a legitimate leak from a person with only one post to their name!

Feali has cracked the case!

[Paula Deen]

Man of Large Orcish Bottoms.

Traask?

i ask myself: what happened with the "eye of ashzara" trademark some years ago ? i never saw a confirmed fake info.

It was confirmed fake right before Blizzcon 2014

Anyway I am really bored of debating grammar. This is the title we're getting if it's real, and it makes grammatical sense. At the very least it makes sense with some poetic license.

Hey, people arguing about it means it isn't perfect....

[Sarethion]

Unfortunately, if there is a confidentiality clause in play, there's absolutely no way to refute it short of Blizzard doing so.

You've confirmed there's an option to hide the trademark from public search or are you saying this based on OPs post?

[Deleted]

But they were events in lore, so according to you, they should be referenced as such.

In lore, yes. It's one of those scenarios where the double the is unavoidable grammatically if you're referring to the event. So it's fine. But the titles themselves trimmed off one of the the's. Not for no reason.

[Gadzooks]

ACTUALLY... SEVERAL of the pages have the application... So, no I'm not being obtuse, obtuse would be to assume that Blizzard is going to name the new expansion after a trademark that was applied for nearly 20 years ago.

Where on earth in that did you get the idea they applied for it 20 years ago?

You have to be trolling.

[Gamevizier]

Man of Large Orcish Bottoms.

Chris Metzen? What about him?

[Celarent]

After reading up on the lore, it'd be a pretty interesting choice -- not left-field like Pandaria and not eye-roll obvious like Draenor. It ties into the end of Hellfire and brings a lot of unknown-yet-familiar characters in a setting that's literally been under our noses. I dunno. Can't help but be psyched.

[Paula Deen]

Where on earth in that did you get the idea they applied for it 20 years ago?

You have to be trolling.

If you look back on the first myself and a few others went full First Grade and forgot how to read and saw the STARCRAFT trademark filed in 1996.

[Gadzooks]

Council of Glades makes no sense. We have the Council of Tirisfal. We have the Tirisfal Glades. But Council of Glades? Not even Council of the Glades? This sounds like something made up by someone who either 1) wants to troll or 2) doesn't know how to pick a cool, proper-sounding name.

On the other hand, a troll would pick something with Azshara or South Seas in it. "Council of Glades" is so...random.

[CosmicGuitars]

I'm imagining AU Azeroth where the villains are an alternate version of the Council of Tirisfal, in a similar fashion to the titular Warlords of Draenor. They'll all be killed off before the first raid tier is over, with Med'an being captured and tortured by AU!Gul'dan, forcing the humans of Lordaeron to drink the demon blood and become an army for the Legion.

*shudder*

[Deleted]

On the other hand, a troll would pick something with Azshara or South Seas in it. "Council of Glades" is so...random.

If that means Council of Glades will have no Azshara I hope everyone at Blizz gets cancer.

Infracted.

[Soulwind]

In lore, yes. It's one of those scenarios where the double the is unavoidable grammatically if you're referring to the event. So it's fine. But the titles themselves trimmed off one of the the's. Not for no reason.

So the expansion could be called Council of the Glades and only when talking about the council ingame you would see it as "the Council of the Glades". That's even if they call them that ingame and not just the Council of Tirisfal.

Which means your argument about "too many thes" is irrelevant.

I mean, sure, it could be the title, they probably were aiming at a good acronym (CoG rather than CotG), but it's still weird, unless they reveal a place literally called Glades.

[Deleted]

I'm imagining AU Azeroth where the villains are an alternate version of the Council of Tirisfal, in a similar fashion to the titular Warlords of Draenor. They'll all be killed off before the first raid tier is over, with Med'an being captured and tortured by AU!Gul'dan, forcing the humans of Lordaeron to drink the demon blood and become an army for the Legion.

*shudder*

Weeeell I mean if there is an AU Azeroth tied to AU Draenor, it does have a not-deadified Medivh/Sargeras.