"Council of Glades" trademark filled

[Deleted]

The original WoD leak was way worse than this and happened to be true. This was indeed very well done and professional.

If it was professional, we wouldn't have found out about it. It's the one "leak" we can be pretty sure is fake.

[Sarethion]

The difference is that the Eye of Azshara and other stuff got many people screaming "fake" right from the start and this one, as it seems, begun to convince some of the people who are usually skeptical about such things.

Besides, there is no objective way to prove EoA is a fake. It's just something that someone wrote, you might argue with him but unless Blizzard says it's fake, it's all a matter whether you decide to believe it. I mean, how else would you prove it wrong? There's no hidden data to find, photoshops to be discovered, etc.

[Deleted]

Well tbh Council of Glades has the exact same reference no. as Warlords of Draenor, so obviously fake. He just copy/pasted WoD and changed the date and name.

Client reference numbers always go up, no reason it would go back to an earlier number... :-) Was a fun thought.

I just registered to tell you that you have an awesome name.

[Gadzooks]

- - - Updated - - -



Who is Ruben?

It's the name in the metadata.

[Deleted]

The difference is that the Eye of Azshara and other stuff got many people screaming "fake" right from the start and this one, as it seems, begun to convince some of the people who are usually skeptical about such things.

Besides, there is no objective way to prove EoA is a fake. It's just something that someone wrote, you might argue with him but unless Blizzard says it's fake, it's all a matter whether you decide to believe it. I mean, how else would you prove it wrong? There's no hidden data to find, photoshops to be discovered, etc.

People screamed fake here too. It was obvious just from the name.

And things like The Dark Prophet were not proven to be fake.

[losmarios]

Take a look at it in Acrobat, and look at the PDF properties, and compare.

The one from the PONZ pdf I got in my email has different properties, they use the Apache PDF generator.

The PDF linked has the user's name, and the creator is Microsoft Word 2013.

Sorry guys, this is an edited or fake PDF.

Fun while it lasted - and at least we know the name of who was trolling. Bad Ruben!

Check your metadata, trolls!

I don't know if it's fake, or not but if it was generated in the office, like the OP says, and not with the web site, the metadata could be MS Word.

Here in the office I can manually generate a PDF from our system, and it opens MS Word in the background and generates the PDF.

[CosmicGuitars]

The difference is that the Eye of Azshara and other stuff got many people screaming "fake" right from the start and this one, as it seems, begun to convince some of the people who are usually skeptical about such things.

Besides, there is no objective way to prove EoA is a fake. It's just something that someone wrote, you might argue with him but unless Blizzard says it's fake, it's all a matter whether you decide to believe it. I mean, how else would you prove it wrong? There's no hidden data to find, photoshops to be discovered, etc.

Eye of Azshara is considered fake because it no longer exists on any trademark database as of right now.

No matter where you go or where you look, you won't find "Eye of Azshara" being registered under Blizzard, or even filed and being processed. It's been completely removed, with the only sign of it ever existing being a broken archived page in the Benelux database. It was only ever briefly on the Benelux database before being removed, never appearing on any other databases.

It's currently in the same state as any other fake leak out there. It's a name people have clung to, but it doesn't tangibly exist.

[Azalar]

Well, at least we got some Chris Pratt dancing while speculating.

[Feali]

People screamed fake here too. It was obvious just from the name.

And things like The Dark Prophet were not proven to be fake.

I still believe in The Dark Prophet.

[Deleted]

If it was professional, we wouldn't have found out about it. It's the one "leak" we can be pretty sure is fake.

You know what a leak means, right?

[Faroth]

Council of Glades? Sure sounds like a Council of (Tirisfal) Glades expansion to me.

http://wowwiki.wikia.com/Council_of_Tirisfal

Some people have speculated that Khadgar of WoD was in fact Medivh in disguise. With the Burning Legion, there's also a clear link.

Heh, just last week I was saying Blizz should mimic FFXIV a bit by having players join a secret group working outside the Horde/Alliance that isn't involved in their politics and battles and was suggesting a reformed Council of Tirisfal Glades.

Lets them drive the story with the players working on their own for Azeroth but intertwining into Alliance/Horde activities at times. I feel like the players have become too much "military members of the Alliance/Horde" and not "adventurers" for a while.

[Deleted]

I still believe in The Dark Prophet.

So do I, makes the most sense.

[Feali]

I don't know if it's fake, or not but if it was generated in the office, like the OP says, and not with the web site, the metadata could be MS Word.

Here in the office I can manually generate a PDF from our system, and it opens MS Word in the background and generates the PDF.

Sooo.. hype back up?

[Gamevizier]

I don't know if it's fake, or not but if it was generated in the office, like the OP says, and not with the web site, the metadata could be MS Word.

Here in the office I can manually generate a PDF from our system, and it opens MS Word in the background and generates the PDF.

everyone get back on the hypetrain! we've not yet reached our destination!

[Deleted]

You know what a leak means, right?

That's why I put it in "

[Deleted]

I don't know if it's fake, or not but if it was generated in the office, like the OP says, and not with the web site, the metadata could be MS Word.

Here in the office I can manually generate a PDF from our system, and it opens MS Word in the background and generates the PDF.

I thought as much.

[Deleted]

everyone get back on the hypetrain! we've not yet reached our destination!

Nope. Still fake.

[Sarethion]

People screamed fake here too. It was obvious just from the name.

It's your opinion that it was obvious from the name, not mine. We can agree to disagree here as I think the name was still possible.
Also, more people screamed fake there than here, at least that's the impression I have and that was my point

[Bakis]

Even if ignoring the 1996 date, BLZ register stuff all the time. Most of it never used.

[Deleted]

It's your opinion that it was obvious from the name, not mine. We can agree to disagree here as I think the name was still possible.
Also, more people screamed fake there than here, at least that's the impression I have and that was my point

That's because I'm right and you're wrong.