Books & Comics would come under different Classification codes. The ones used for the Council Of Glades TM are for Goods Class 9 , Services class 41 with the descriptions covering computer game software and entertainment services (paraphrasing the description class from the PDF on my iPad BTW). It doesn't cover comic books.
Books/Comic Books are generally IC 16 , not IC 9
Look at the PDF of the older filings. Look at how many were transferred from an agent to Blizzard. That's how you hide it. Easy, inexpensive, and just some extra paperwork. On the IPONZ site, you can do it online.
I've never heard of "private filing", in the US. A trademark application, and the resulting records are legal documents, and in the US, the Freedom Of Information Act doesn't allow for "private filings". They warn you when filing to not include personal info you don't want made public, as the databases are easily searched by the public, which is why they allow PO Boxes. I strongly doubt New Zealand would allow it, either.
I know something's going on at Gamescom, when it comes to these *leaks* I trust none of it.
#TeamLegion #UnderEarthofAzerothexpansion plz #Arathor4Alliance #TeamNoBlueHorde
Warrior-Magi
Jumping from page 1 here! Has the trademark been confirmed as a fake or something yet?
If not then I'd assume this is probably something for Diablo. Certainly sounds like it!
Why are people crying Med'an? as far as we know this can have nothing to do with him since Khadgar has Atiesh... Blizzard has never reconized those comics as canon outside of a few characters here & there for all we know they are going to retcon Med'an out so calm down...
Looks like someone thinks they are trying to be sneaky and bought www.councilofglades.com today.
--- Want any of my Constitutional rights?, ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
I come from a time and a place where I judge people by the content of their character; I don't give a damn if you are tall or short; gay or straight; Jew or Gentile; White, Black, Brown or Green; Conservative or Liberal. -- Note to mods: if you are going to infract me have the decency to post the reason, and expect to hold everyone else to the same standard.
1. Nope, it has not been proven fake yet, but there were many solid arguments presented that make it very unlikely to be true.
2. Diablo? WTF?! It's sounds absolutely nothing like a Diablo expansion... Lord of Destruction, Reaper of Souls and... Council of Glades. Completely different if you ask me.
You do realize that nothing you actually said is the reason why it's appearing fake, right? You don't get to after-the-fact appropriate explanations that were nothing that you were talking about.'ll leave you with this, not everything is as it appears at first, not is it always as you wish it. Turns out my skepticism was warranted. Now, I can summarily dismiss you and anything you say that isn't an apology.
You did nothing but sit there and say that you wouldn't read the actual page people were talking about and then, looking at the Starcraft trademark dates, declare it fake.
Too bad it was by people who were actually reading the page that people were discussing. So, no, sorry, you don't get to declare that you were right.Point is there were folks in the beginning that thought this looked wrong... Turns out it appears they were the ones that had it right all along.
Last edited by KrazyK923; 2015-07-27 at 01:43 PM.
--- Want any of my Constitutional rights?, ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
I come from a time and a place where I judge people by the content of their character; I don't give a damn if you are tall or short; gay or straight; Jew or Gentile; White, Black, Brown or Green; Conservative or Liberal. -- Note to mods: if you are going to infract me have the decency to post the reason, and expect to hold everyone else to the same standard.