Page 25 of 80 FirstFirst ...
15
23
24
25
26
27
35
75
... LastLast
  1. #481
    Scarab Lord Gamevizier's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, US
    Posts
    4,717
    Quote Originally Posted by Andyssian View Post
    Why should we trust you?
    in D we trust?

  2. #482
    Quote Originally Posted by Midnightaura View Post
    My 2 Pennies.

    If this is indeed legit, i would guess that this will be the name of a book or a comic etc that will preempt the next expansion, sort of like how the warlords series did with those short cartoons.
    Books & Comics would come under different Classification codes. The ones used for the Council Of Glades TM are for Goods Class 9 , Services class 41 with the descriptions covering computer game software and entertainment services (paraphrasing the description class from the PDF on my iPad BTW). It doesn't cover comic books.

    Books/Comic Books are generally IC 16 , not IC 9

  3. #483
    Quote Originally Posted by bluspacecow View Post
    I'm not finding any links on the IPONZ site suggesting a private filing is possible.

    "Private filing" defined as a filing that doesn't get uploaded to the publically searchable online trademark database. This is not the same thing as confidentiality of certain key information. NZ has fairly strigent privacy laws that organisations and especially government organisations need to adhere to , least they get slapped with very large fines and possible legal preceddings / a media circus.

    Logically for them to want to keep it off the public database there must be some form of fee for doing so.

    I'm not seeing anything at their schedule of fees at :

    http://www.iponz.govt.nz/cms/trade-marks/fees

    To suggest a private filing is possible.

    Anyone else got any links to prove a private filing is possible ?
    Look at the PDF of the older filings. Look at how many were transferred from an agent to Blizzard. That's how you hide it. Easy, inexpensive, and just some extra paperwork. On the IPONZ site, you can do it online.

    I've never heard of "private filing", in the US. A trademark application, and the resulting records are legal documents, and in the US, the Freedom Of Information Act doesn't allow for "private filings". They warn you when filing to not include personal info you don't want made public, as the databases are easily searched by the public, which is why they allow PO Boxes. I strongly doubt New Zealand would allow it, either.

  4. #484
    Quote Originally Posted by banestalker View Post
    in D we trust?
    Well, I much prefer to trust Ds than Vs, so I'm with you on this one

  5. #485
    Void Lord Aeluron Lightsong's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    In some Sanctuaryesque place or a Haven
    Posts
    44,683
    I know something's going on at Gamescom, when it comes to these *leaks* I trust none of it.
    #TeamLegion #UnderEarthofAzerothexpansion plz #Arathor4Alliance #TeamNoBlueHorde

    Warrior-Magi

  6. #486
    Quote Originally Posted by comfortpro View Post
    Although this trademark is already reserved and blocked, it has not yet shown up in the public database as
    requested by the applicant. The Intellectual Property Office of new Zealand offers this kind of procedure
    to clients for an additional fee.
    No, they don't, Ruben.

  7. #487
    Scarab Lord TriHard's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    FF14 > WoW. Not an opinion, that's facts.
    Posts
    4,344
    Jumping from page 1 here! Has the trademark been confirmed as a fake or something yet?

    If not then I'd assume this is probably something for Diablo. Certainly sounds like it!

  8. #488
    Quote Originally Posted by Gadzooks View Post
    No, they don't, Ruben.
    But it is possible to hide it by a transfer from the agent? I'm not trying to imply anything here, just curious whether I've understood you correctly

  9. #489
    Why are people crying Med'an? as far as we know this can have nothing to do with him since Khadgar has Atiesh... Blizzard has never reconized those comics as canon outside of a few characters here & there for all we know they are going to retcon Med'an out so calm down...

  10. #490
    Looks like someone thinks they are trying to be sneaky and bought www.councilofglades.com today.



  11. #491
    Titan Seranthor's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Langley, London, Undisclosed Locations
    Posts
    11,355
    Quote Originally Posted by Tauror View Post
    For no other reasons than the name or gut feeling.
    Truthfully, my gut reaction to EVERY 'leak' is that they are fake until they are proven to be true.

    --- Want any of my Constitutional rights?, ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
    I come from a time and a place where I judge people by the content of their character; I don't give a damn if you are tall or short; gay or straight; Jew or Gentile; White, Black, Brown or Green; Conservative or Liberal. -- Note to mods: if you are going to infract me have the decency to post the reason, and expect to hold everyone else to the same standard.

  12. #492
    Quote Originally Posted by Syrith View Post
    Jumping from page 1 here! Has the trademark been confirmed as a fake or something yet?

    If not then I'd assume this is probably something for Diablo. Certainly sounds like it!
    1. Nope, it has not been proven fake yet, but there were many solid arguments presented that make it very unlikely to be true.
    2. Diablo? WTF?! It's sounds absolutely nothing like a Diablo expansion... Lord of Destruction, Reaper of Souls and... Council of Glades. Completely different if you ask me.

  13. #493
    Quote Originally Posted by Elvine View Post
    Looks like someone thinks they are trying to be sneaky and bought www.councilofglades.com today.


    Yeah, that was brought up a few pages ago, that site is fake for sure. Bought from NYC.

  14. #494
    'll leave you with this, not everything is as it appears at first, not is it always as you wish it. Turns out my skepticism was warranted. Now, I can summarily dismiss you and anything you say that isn't an apology.
    You do realize that nothing you actually said is the reason why it's appearing fake, right? You don't get to after-the-fact appropriate explanations that were nothing that you were talking about.

    You did nothing but sit there and say that you wouldn't read the actual page people were talking about and then, looking at the Starcraft trademark dates, declare it fake.

    Point is there were folks in the beginning that thought this looked wrong... Turns out it appears they were the ones that had it right all along.
    Too bad it was by people who were actually reading the page that people were discussing. So, no, sorry, you don't get to declare that you were right.
    Last edited by KrazyK923; 2015-07-27 at 01:43 PM.

  15. #495
    The Insane Acidbaron's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Belgium, Flanders
    Posts
    18,230
    Quote Originally Posted by Oglaf View Post
    If it was professional, we wouldn't have found out about it. It's the one "leak" we can be pretty sure is fake.
    The others are fake also very simple by simply reading things as 'a demon hunter' class or a new lichking. Fanfiction nothing more

  16. #496
    Titan Seranthor's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Langley, London, Undisclosed Locations
    Posts
    11,355
    Quote Originally Posted by banestalker View Post
    some folks yeah. not you though, you started bashing it because you didn't read it carefuly and thought the trademark was from years ago. you're not invited to their "myth busting party".
    didn't HAVE to read it 'carefully' Sir... my gut said it was fake from the beginning. So, I was right... and who wanted to go to your 'myth busting party'... I have garrisonville to play.... /snicker.

    --- Want any of my Constitutional rights?, ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
    I come from a time and a place where I judge people by the content of their character; I don't give a damn if you are tall or short; gay or straight; Jew or Gentile; White, Black, Brown or Green; Conservative or Liberal. -- Note to mods: if you are going to infract me have the decency to post the reason, and expect to hold everyone else to the same standard.

  17. #497
    Quote Originally Posted by Elvine View Post
    Looks like someone thinks they are trying to be sneaky and bought www.councilofglades.com today.


    That is suspicious too... Wouldn't Blizzard already have the site registered before registering trademarks?

  18. #498
    Scarab Lord Gamevizier's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, US
    Posts
    4,717
    Quote Originally Posted by Andyssian View Post
    1. Nope, it has not been proven fake yet, but there were many solid arguments presented that make it very unlikely to be true.
    2. Diablo? WTF?! It's sounds absolutely nothing like a Diablo expansion... Lord of Destruction, Reaper of Souls and... Council of Glades. Completely different if you ask me.
    its a mad, mad world we live in :P...

  19. #499
    Quote Originally Posted by Paula Deen View Post
    Yeah, that was brought up a few pages ago, that site is fake for sure. Bought from NYC.
    Yup, the purchase was a fake or an attempt to perhaps make money if Blizzard does try to buy it from them.. but I'd think they would be smarter and already have bought if it were a real IP.

  20. #500
    Quote Originally Posted by Seranthor View Post
    didn't HAVE to read it 'carefully' Sir... my gut said it was fake from the beginning. So, I was right... and who wanted to go to your 'myth busting party'... I have garrisonville to play.... /snicker.
    What a joke. So is that your excuse now? Your "gut" said it was fake? Bahahah. Yeah, I'm going to keep my philosophy on you from earlier on now.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •