Page 41 of 80 FirstFirst ...
31
39
40
41
42
43
51
... LastLast
  1. #801
    Quote Originally Posted by Andyssian View Post
    In the official listings?
    Yeah. I'll see if I can rustle them up again.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by TheWindWalker View Post
    This is almost certainly fake but I would be absolutely ecstatic about an expansion with a fresh theme and unfamiliar enemies. Which hasn't happened I think... ever.

    We've basically had "The Orcs are up to something" after "The Orcs are up to something" after "That guy from WC2 and those dudes you fought throughout WotLK are up to something" after "The Lich King" after "That stuff we started to deal with in WC3-TFT."

    Guess the only big question would be: Me...dan?
    Med'an - "The quarter-Orc is up to something!"

    Legit on that alone.

  2. #802
    Druid legendary.
    Quote Originally Posted by Themius View Post
    We have had multiple threads of white people complaining that black people were offended over some racist thing some white person said.
    Here we have a thread of white people offended over something some racist black person said.
    The key difference is that the white people in this thread aren't being told "shut up stop being offended get over it."

  3. #803
    Yay for more speculation.

    keeps me occupied until the actual announcement

  4. #804
    Quote Originally Posted by Mojo Risin View Post
    When do you expect the examination phase to end?
    Could take anywhere from 10 days upwards to get approved.

    Quote Originally Posted by Andyssian View Post
    Op, how come it was filed during the weekend?
    I don't know. Wasn't it like friday in the US?

    You'll find other applications in the public database filed on July 25th, like this one:
    iponz.govt.nz/app/Extra/IP/Mutual/Browse.aspx?sid=635736654427683857

  5. #805
    Why was the PDF you provided created with a different program than the Apache server that generates other PDFs from the site? That was one of the big 'fake' signs.

  6. #806
    Quote Originally Posted by Soulwind View Post
    Why was the PDF you provided created with a different program than the Apache server that generates other PDFs from the site? That was one of the big 'fake' signs.
    I had to edit the first page of the document since it contained a search query proposal id which i'd rather not see in public.

  7. #807
    Deleted
    Thanks for the answers, OP.

  8. #808
    Warchief OGXanos's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    The Nerdy South
    Posts
    2,135
    nitpicking, can we get this moved to WoW General?

  9. #809
    I am Murloc! Kuja's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    City of Judgement
    Posts
    5,493
    This would seem 100x better than a south seas expansion even without knowing what it's about. Hopefully we'll finally know what's under Tirisfal I still think it's Subway. And Bolvar and friends are there.

    My gold making blog
    Your journey towards the gold cap!


  10. #810
    The Undying Slowpoke is a Gamer's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    World of Wisconsin
    Posts
    37,283
    Why are we still here? The trademark ID was Warlords of Draenor's.
    FFXIV - Maduin (Dynamis DC)

  11. #811
    Titan Arbs's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    12,899
    Quote Originally Posted by dashflash890 View Post
    Druid legendary.
    Still waiting for it!
    I don't always hunt things, But when I do, It's because they're things & I'm a Bear.


  12. #812
    The Insane Feali's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Cornelia Street
    Posts
    15,473
    Quote Originally Posted by OGXanos View Post
    nitpicking, can we get this moved to WoW General?
    Yes, please.

  13. #813
    Quote Originally Posted by comfortpro View Post
    I had to edit the first page of the document since it contained a search query proposal id which i'd rather not see in public.
    Shrug. I'd be 110% paranoid about losing my job and other consequences. This sounds like something I'd do. Though I'd love to know how you edited the first page of the document and kept the formatting perfect in Word. I couldn't manage it

    You also realise there's a name attached to the document metadata, right? If that's actually you..

  14. #814
    Quote Originally Posted by Slowpoke is a Gamer View Post
    Why are we still here? The trademark ID was Warlords of Draenor's.
    The OP has taken the time to explain every 'wrong' detail with the trademark. It's... actually fairly reasonable.

  15. #815
    The Insane Feali's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Cornelia Street
    Posts
    15,473
    Quote Originally Posted by Slowpoke is a Gamer View Post
    Why are we still here? The trademark ID was Warlords of Draenor's.
    Read this:

    Quote Originally Posted by comfortpro View Post
    When a client files a private application, no IP number will be assigned until the record is going public.
    But since there needs to be an internal application ID, a client reference code is required.
    In this case the ID is 683706TM00086, meaning the 86th trademark for client reference 683706 LXT/FJU/jnf.

    It's correct that this client reference code has already been used for application Warlords of Draenor.
    The reuse of a client reference is not common but at this stage it's not something that will cause the disapproval of this case.

    When the examination phase ends, the applicant will be promted to enter a new client reference for this case.
    He can also assign a new code for any of his existing cases whenever he wants to.

  16. #816
    Quote Originally Posted by Slowpoke is a Gamer View Post
    Why are we still here? The trademark ID was Warlords of Draenor's.
    Because as I pointed out last night, you can change your client ID to anything you like, including previous trademark IDs, while the application is in progress. It's an easy way to obfuscate, if the trademark were found prematurely.

    It's straight out not applicable as a means of refuting the application. You can find the info (that you can change client reference IDs at will, without it showing on the trademark history) directly on the IPONZ website.

  17. #817
    Quote Originally Posted by Slowpoke is a Gamer View Post
    Why are we still here? The trademark ID was Warlords of Draenor's.
    No it wasn't.

    The client reference numbers are the same not the ID number.

    It only has an ID number while going through the to process AFAIK. Once it's published it gets a IP number.

    The client reference number can be assigned by the client. Go look it up on the IPONZ site. They have a pdf about the trademark process. Page 13 explains what it is
    Last edited by bluspacecow; 2015-07-27 at 08:15 PM.

  18. #818
    Quote Originally Posted by comfortpro View Post
    Could take anywhere from 10 days upwards to get approved.



    I don't know. Wasn't it like friday in the US?

    You'll find other applications in the public database filed on July 25th, like this one:
    iponz.govt.nz/app/Extra/IP/Mutual/Browse.aspx?sid=635736654427683857
    It was Saturday on the 25th all over the world. It's kind of how calendars work.

    And you still haven't shown how the trademark office makes records hidden from the public, despite there being no hint or trace of that kind of "service" to be found, as you claim in the first post in this thread.

  19. #819
    The Insane Feali's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Cornelia Street
    Posts
    15,473
    So as much as Oglaf hates it: this leak is STILL legit!

  20. #820
    Oddly, it makes sense that Blizzard would do everything they can think of to throw us off the scent, including using the WoD reference number since they'll only be asked to change it upon its acceptance.

    Thank you comfortpro for the clarifications. I'm thoroughly interested in this post again. Real or not, I enjoy reading all of the crazy speculation before announcements.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •