Page 1 of 31
1
2
3
11
... LastLast
  1. #1
    Deleted

    The vileness of SJW reaches new heights

    The latest in the long line of social justice pity parties is sympathy for pedophiles who supposedly "don't act on it". (And yes they will compare you to a racist if you dislike pedophiles.) Take the following two articles from Salon which is the perfect illustration of what I'm talking about with "wonderful" headlines such as "I'm a pedophile but not a monster" and "My week inside the vile right-wing hate machine". Given that cultural marxists are all about breaking down every facet of western culture, it is not surprising that they are going after one of the last (and perfectly reasonable given the consequences) taboos.

    A few faux-libertarians have also tried to hijack libertarianism to argue that "age of consent is government intrusion" or whatever, but this is overwhelmingly an SJW/far left problem.

    http://www.salon.com/2015/09/21/im_a...not_a_monster/
    http://www.salon.com/2015/09/30/im_a..._hate_machine/

    My suggestion is pretty straight forward. If you really won't "act on it", why do you feel the need to TALK about it to us at large? Go cry about it to a psychiatrist.

    No, the real agenda is far more sinister and has to do with the gradual normalization of pedophilia, perhaps not to a point where the act itself is actually legal, but if the anti-racist pro-LGBTQKHFOAHFLAFglhalghla trend is anything to go by, I wouldn't be shocked if SJW start asking for "pedophile quotas" in companies, shaming companies for not having X% of its staff pedophiles, "pedophile representation in video games" or force people to hire known pedophiles to work with children (as long as they don't "act on it" ofc whatever that means) on pain of being called "pedophobes" or some bullshit term like that.

    What's more disturbing is that SJW CONSTANTLY shame straight men for having certain beauty standards like the hourglass shape, being young (not THAT young) and fit or big boobs or whatever, they say that's "objectification". But we should respect deviants. It's stupid.

  2. #2
    So you're saying anti-racism is a problem?

  3. #3
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by zorkuus View Post
    So you're saying anti-racism is a problem?
    Some forms are. It doesn't matter if X% of a company isn't black as long as each individual is treated based on the "content of his character".

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Thunderaan View Post
    The latest in the long line of social justice pity parties is sympathy for pedophiles who supposedly "don't act on it". (And yes they will compare you to a racist if you dislike pedophiles.) Take the following two articles from Salon which is the perfect illustration of what I'm talking about with "wonderful" headlines such as "I'm a pedophile but not a monster" and "My week inside the vile right-wing hate machine". Given that cultural marxists are all about breaking down every facet of western culture, it is not surprising that they are going after one of the last (and perfectly reasonable given the consequences) taboos.

    A few faux-libertarians have also tried to hijack libertarianism to argue that "age of consent is government intrusion" or whatever, but this is overwhelmingly an SJW/far left problem.

    http://www.salon.com/2015/09/21/im_a...not_a_monster/
    http://www.salon.com/2015/09/30/im_a..._hate_machine/

    My suggestion is pretty straight forward. If you really won't "act on it", why do you feel the need to TALK about it to us at large? Go cry about it to a psychiatrist.

    No, the real agenda is far more sinister and has to do with the gradual normalization of pedophilia, perhaps not to a point where the act itself is actually legal, but if the anti-racist pro-LGBTQKHFOAHFLAFglhalghla trend is anything to go by, I wouldn't be shocked if SJW start asking for "pedophile quotas" in companies, shaming companies for not having X% of its staff pedophiles, "pedophile representation in video games" or force people to hire known pedophiles to work with children (as long as they don't "act on it" ofc whatever that means) on pain of being called "pedophobes" or some bullshit term like that.

    What's more disturbing is that SJW CONSTANTLY shame straight men for having certain beauty standards like the hourglass shape, being young (not THAT young) and fit or big boobs or whatever, they say that's "objectification". But we should respect deviants. It's stupid.
    You need a new hobby.

    Quote Originally Posted by Thunderaan View Post
    Go cry about it to a psychiatrist.
    They frequently can't because mandatory reporting.

    http://www.theatlantic.com/health/ar...philia/279024/

    Many jurisdictions have passed mandatory reporting regulations for psychologists and other health care providers. Consequently, when someone who thinks he might be a pedophile comes in for counseling or therapy, the psychologist may be compelled by law to report the person to the authorities. That, of course, can lead to loss of the person’s job, family, and everything else. So, these people have simply stopped coming in at all, and instead of getting help to them, we now have pedophiles circulating in society receiving no support at all.
    If you have zero clue about what you are talking about, save us all the migraines and don't talk.

  5. #5
    Deleted
    I still think that SJW's only exist in fiction.

    I have never seen or heared of them outside of the (obscure parts of the-) internet.

  6. #6
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by IKT View Post
    If you have zero clue about what you are talking about, save us all the migraines and don't talk.
    That article makes no sense.

    As long as you haven't abused anyone and don't posses child porn, there is nothing authorities can do.

    Pedophiles do NOT need social justice. Period.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Furitrix View Post
    I don't see the issue. Some people are born with certain sexual preferences
    It's not even an orientation it's a fetish.

  7. #7
    Deleted
    Well that is one hell of a slippery slope right there.

  8. #8
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Thunderaan View Post
    It's not even an orientation it's a fetish.
    It is no fetish it is a paraphilia.

  9. #9
    Strange, I don't feel ashamed for liking hourglass-figures and big boobs.

    And what about pedophiles? As long as they don't act on their impulses I don't see how it concerns me, and there is no doubt a massive stigma against pedophiles who don't like who they are so again, this does not bother me.
    "In order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance." Paradox of tolerance

  10. #10
    You want to prosecute people for their thoughts?
    For things they cannot help?

  11. #11
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Deruyter View Post
    I still think that SJW's only exist in fiction.

    I have never seen or heared of them outside of the (obscure parts of the-) internet.
    You ARE one.

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Thunderaan View Post
    As long as you haven't abused anyone and don't posses child porn, there is nothing authorities can do.
    Oh ok, feel free to walk into the police and say you're thinking about having sex with a child, it's just a fantasy not real, see how they take it. Please report back how you go.

    retard

    Infracted
    Last edited by Darsithis; 2015-10-09 at 05:09 PM.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by det View Post
    Is "SJW" now what you call everybody who disagrees with you? The new buzzword that replaces "terrorist"?
    Basically, yes.

  14. #14
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by det View Post
    Well, also..why is it suddenly bad that some people engage themselves for "social justice"?
    It is the warrior part that should give it away.

    Fighting the "enemy"

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by det View Post
    Is "SJW" now what you call everybody who disagrees with you? The new buzzword that replaces "terrorist"?
    SJW just means "someone who is prepared to call me out when I'm being an ass".
    There's just a large movement of people who think being raging assholes is their divine right.

  16. #16
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Xarim View Post
    Well that is one hell of a slippery slope right there.
    Not even close, we know how the far left operates already. They do this all the time with every single group of people they deem to be an "oppressed minority".

    First they push tolerance, then acceptance, then celebration and supremacy.

    The patterns are there. Only this time they aren't defending a skin color or some other harmless trait, they are defending deviants.

  17. #17
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by IKT View Post
    Oh ok, feel free to walk into the police and say you're thinking about having sex with a child, it's just a fantasy not real, see how they take it. Please report back how you go.

    retard
    There would be nothing they could do about it. There are people who fantazises about all kind of strange stuff like cannibalism etc.

  18. #18
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Imnick View Post
    SJW just means "someone who is prepared to call me out when I'm being an ass", except people don't like them doing that.
    No its a term for the authoritarian collectivist left who disagree with freedom of speech and social libertys.
    The end justifys the means crowd.

    It's only bad if other people do it because I figth for the greater good otherwise I would be an horrible person.

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Thunderaan View Post
    Not even close, we know how the far left operates already. They do this all the time with every single group of people they deem to be an "oppressed minority".

    First they push tolerance, then acceptance, then celebration and supremacy.

    The patterns are there. Only this time they aren't defending a skin color or some other harmless trait, they are defending deviants.
    If a person has done nothing illegal, what would you like us to do about it, exactly?

  20. #20
    Deleted
    Quote Originally Posted by Noradin View Post
    You want to prosecute people for their thoughts?
    For things they cannot help?
    Another SJW strawman. Nobody is being prosecuted for their thoughts and never will. However we don't need to make it socially acceptable to share those thoughts. It's taboo for a very good reason and let's stick to that.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by buck008 View Post
    If a person has done nothing illegal, what would you like us to do about it, exactly?
    Go read my posts again, I'm not going to spell it out to people who post in bad faith.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by IKT View Post
    Oh ok, feel free to walk into the police and say you're thinking about having sex with a child, it's just a fantasy not real, see how they take it. Please report back how you go.

    retard
    No, I'm not going to make a fool of myself in public just to prove a point, you tell me which state, which county, which city, which anything has a law regulating your thoughts in that manner.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •