The latest in the long line of social justice pity parties is sympathy for pedophiles who supposedly "don't act on it". (And yes they will compare you to a racist if you dislike pedophiles.) Take the following two articles from Salon which is the perfect illustration of what I'm talking about with "wonderful" headlines such as "I'm a pedophile but not a monster" and "My week inside the vile right-wing hate machine". Given that cultural marxists are all about breaking down every facet of western culture, it is not surprising that they are going after one of the last (and perfectly reasonable given the consequences) taboos.
A few faux-libertarians have also tried to hijack libertarianism to argue that "age of consent is government intrusion" or whatever, but this is overwhelmingly an SJW/far left problem.
http://www.salon.com/2015/09/21/im_a...not_a_monster/
http://www.salon.com/2015/09/30/im_a..._hate_machine/
My suggestion is pretty straight forward. If you really won't "act on it", why do you feel the need to TALK about it to us at large? Go cry about it to a psychiatrist.
No, the real agenda is far more sinister and has to do with the gradual normalization of pedophilia, perhaps not to a point where the act itself is actually legal, but if the anti-racist pro-LGBTQKHFOAHFLAFglhalghla trend is anything to go by, I wouldn't be shocked if SJW start asking for "pedophile quotas" in companies, shaming companies for not having X% of its staff pedophiles, "pedophile representation in video games" or force people to hire known pedophiles to work with children (as long as they don't "act on it" ofc whatever that means) on pain of being called "pedophobes" or some bullshit term like that.
What's more disturbing is that SJW CONSTANTLY shame straight men for having certain beauty standards like the hourglass shape, being young (not THAT young) and fit or big boobs or whatever, they say that's "objectification". But we should respect deviants. It's stupid.