I don't get it. This post may be in the Paladin area, but I'm asking you too, you who play some other classes/specs.
I often have the feeling that we're not bad, but less good than the other melee in most people minds. Is it really factual ? Doesn't the fact to just consider that " It is said among the community that Retribution is not good ", curb the possibility of the class to simply emerge and demonstrate its possibilities (sure, you won't have the possibility to change your mind about them if you simply don't give them the chance to show you what they can do) ?
I even heard " Paladins are healers, no fighters ". In the lore, from Uther to Tirion, paladins are mostly holy fighters (then retribution), and great heroes of the Alliance. Many of us have to heal to be taken in consideration, keeping Retribution for random bgs, some kind of personal garden in fact, but by no means taken seriously in consideration from a competitive point of view.
The few times we " shined ", I had the feeling we were that student in the back of the classroom who suddenly had good results, but that the rest of the classroom got angry because that was not normal. Like some kind of sub-caste that has to remain in an average performing condition, not more.
You, who wouldn't actually take a retribution paladin in your team or roster, what change would be needed to the spec to have your mind changed ?
I don't understand Blizzard approach either ... what do they expect and intend ?