I think the media loves causing fake outrage (looks at starbucks cups)
I think the media loves causing fake outrage (looks at starbucks cups)
Since social media have become the de facto wellspring for unmoderated and rapid production of disproportionate internet outrage: Unless it's literally about an incoming nuclear attack I don't count it as news.
WoW: Crowcloak (Druid) & Neesheya (Paladin) @ Sylvanas EU (/ˈkaZHo͞oəl/) | GW2: Siqqa (Asura Engineer) @ Piken Square EU
If builders built houses the way programmers built programs,the first woodpecker to come along would destroy civilization. - Weinberg's 2nd law
He seeks them here, he seeks them there, he seeks those lupins everywhere!
no one should be outraged, this is fucking garbage waste of human energy.
At least they put a ginger on what I'm assuming is strawberry.
Sexist? Possibly, but not any more so than most public media I see.
Racist? I don't see it. It's not like they're pushing one over the other or implying one is better than the other, just making use of different skin tones.
Not sure I think it's a particularly good design, but I don't see much to get outraged over.
Confused here maybe someone could enlighten me.
Don't people complain all the time that the white women are seen too much on advertisements? I thought these people would be happy to see a person-of-color on a milk bottle.
Last edited by Mistame; 2015-11-14 at 04:12 AM.
This is so offensive.
The RED strawberry girl looks part native american (REDskin)
The YELLOW banana girl is clearly asian. Also the banana is obviously symbolizing a penis
The BROWN chocolate girl doesn't even have to be explained
The PURPLE has 2 total lesbians (purple was previously the color of the gay flag before they stole the rainbow)
The shape of the bottle looks like a pill capsule (Promoting drug use to children)
The whole idea that humans can "own" milk like some sort of slave masters.
The brand name is only in 1 language?! How racist can you get. What if someone who only speaks english or chinese wants to know what your product is?
The use of drawn cartoon girls instead of actual girls implying real women aren't good enough to be part of a logo. (cartoon women have been out-logoing women for years btw and nobody even tries to stop it)
These guys are out of control and need to be stopped. Oh and all the girls are drawn too thin. Stop fat shaming me, milk.
Last edited by LiiLoSNK; 2015-11-14 at 06:10 AM.
"I'm not stuck in the trench, I'm maintaining my rating."
That was my first thought.
People are just too overly-sensitive nowadays and they aren't happy unless they can find something to be outraged about. Personally, I'd love it if milk bottles here suddenly had sexy pinup girls on them; I'd drink a hell of a lot more milk.
Will you believe that, I didn't even know of this and I LIVE in germany. Granted, I usually run straight past the section with müllermilch because there is nothing of value to me there.
But now, thanks to the streisand-effect (by proxy), I learned about it and instantly went and bought a chocolady milk.
Would have been better if it was a delicious brown loli but alas, you can't have everything.
It was good (not as good as instant cocoa, mind you, but it was good. Maybe the angry tears of a million triggered feminists gave it that special taste?
I wouldn't buy it for a kid to drink, but I would buy it for myself
My part in this story has been decided. And I will play it well.
It's not offensive it is just stupid.
The marketing strategy is so obviously meant to offend, or titillate or whatever that it only makes the company look retarded.
If you are advertising Underwear, sure I can see it.
You are advertising MILK... it has nothing to do with sex so it just makes the company look like an attention whore or something.